im trying to get some starts and minutes for my low WE guys against bad teams.

so ,  im starting these three dudes at pg, sg and sf.
d3
i know this looks awful, but the teams im playing are pretty weak sim teams. i actually think these cats can hold thier own,  but, if not,  i think we should blow them away when our real starters come in.

still,  i realize by playng games with the lineup i introduce the possibility that we could be upset.  im hoping that making the right choices of where to play these guys will lessen the odds of being upset .

we are playing 3-2 zone   triangle offense
several opponents are zone,  which i would think is a good thing as it will not expose our poor ball skills and IQ as much?
Id prefer to line them up like this:
PG -     26ath  58sp     53bh   58pa    d-  IQ
SG -     41ath   77sp   67bh   36pa     d- IQ
SF -   62ath    61sp     47bh   49pa     b-  IQ


but wondering if i need the b- IQ at PG?

I would play around with it a bit. I think the PG's low athleticism and speed combo makes that player the SF. As for the other two, just on a hunch, I'd go w/ the SF at PG and the SG at SG because the higher IQ and passing on the SF. However, against a press, I might start the SG at PG.      

highest stamina would "suck wind" the least...

I'd rather have the athletic guy at SF than PG, I think I agree with your plan

thanks fellas.

hopefully i havent underestimated my opponents and it wont really matter.  
up first is a simmy with 9 frosh (including 2 walkons)  2 jrs and a sr.  and their upperclassmen are worse than my young dudes. 

I think I could start kelby at PG and win this one.

I think I could start kelby at PG and win this one.

::thumbs up::

being a guy who doesn't believe athleticism is a must at pg. I say start the pg depending on how much room he has for improvement.

I'd play the B- IQ guy at PG.    I don't know how much IQ effects the "PASSING" effect but it's probably worth more than the couple point the PG you have listed has on the SF.

sf