http://whatifsports.com/hd/TeamProfile/Ratings.aspx?tid=8294

I'm wondering if Fox is good enough to start even though he has bad ATH and DEF.  I play a motion and man D.

I don't have a solid starter at SF because none of my guys have good enough REB, LP, BH, PAS mix to be confidant starting at that spot.  I've used Knapp and Elliot at SF and used the other of the two at SG because they both have good BH, and PER.  If I can get the right PG, SG, SF mix I think I can have a solid team.  I recruited for high ATH and DEF my last two recruiting tours but I am realizing now that I sacrificed BH and PAS and even LP at the SF position by doing so.  I think I have my PF and C rotation down.  Thoughts from anyone?  I think I can get deep into the NT if I get my rotation set correct.

I have some experience selling out for ATH & DEF, then realizing that I've failed to get enough BH & P.  I would tell you that Fox needs to come off the bench in a man D.  You should still make sure he gets his minutes to help on offense, but he has to come off the bench. 

Your starting lineup has to include: PG - Elliott, SG - Knapp, PF - Colucci & C - Pittman.  Coming off the bench PG - Fox; SG - Hopkins; PF - Weyant; & C - Kenney.   That leaves your SF some mix of Millhouse, Elam & Zanis.   The choice is pretty straightforward: who has the most potential to develop quickly if given more starts & minutes?  Start that one.  Against better teams, choose whether you need to start Elam or Zanis based upon the speed of your opponent's SF.  None of those guys will help you on the offensive end.  

I appreciate it rogelio. Makes total sense.