Figure I'd jump on the who do you take bandwagon and ask about something I've been seeing a lot more since the update.
Without seeing current ratings for draft prospects or internationals, it makes it a lot harder to evaluate basic questions we used to have a pretty good idea on like will this guy have the DUR/STA to start, or reach a STA high enough to be useful as a reliever, as well as issues with range and arm strength.
Hypothetically, if you saw 2 guys with the exact same projected ratings, but one had a DUR/STA of 73/21 and the other had DUR/STA of 56/37, which one would you take? Assuming they could each get you an ERA of 3.50 or so.
What changes in projected ratings would make you change your mind? One thing I was trying to look into a bit was whether there were more guys with the durability to start, but not the stamina, versus guys with the stamina to start, but not the durability. That could shed some light on which rating is more likely to be projected wrong and be a dealbreaker.