In case people were interested in who was signing the top 100 players in 3.0, I started to collect some data.

Iba (1st session only)

signed	Big 6	%
73	47	64

Phelan (all)

	signed	B6	%
All	100	73	73
Top 25	25	22	88

Crum (1st Session)

Signed	B6	%
69	47	68

Could you clarify the tabs a bit please.

Interesting. I'd be really curious to see the details behind the players that didn't sign B6. Where did they sign, distance between them and where they signed, etc.

If you've got the data in an excel I'd be happy to help pick it apart!

Posted by cal_bears on 12/19/2016 7:22:00 PM (view original):
Could you clarify the tabs a bit please.

I'll try to space it out, wish the tables were better in this thing.

Iba (1st session only) - 64% of top 100 recruits signed by Big 6

Phelan (both sessions) - 73% of top 100 recruits signed by Big 6. 88% of Top 25 signed by Big 6

Crum (1st Session) - 68% of top 100 recruits signed by Big 6

Posted by mbriese on 12/19/2016 7:25:00 PM (view original):
Interesting. I'd be really curious to see the details behind the players that didn't sign B6. Where did they sign, distance between them and where they signed, etc.

If you've got the data in an excel I'd be happy to help pick it apart!

Sure here's the google doc

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dMKsMRSerokeK1clNsVg2Ur4nkvIsEsuIyDlYiGr0zU/edit?usp=sharing

Posted by mbriese on 12/19/2016 7:25:00 PM (view original):
Interesting. I'd be really curious to see the details behind the players that didn't sign B6. Where did they sign, distance between them and where they signed, etc.

If you've got the data in an excel I'd be happy to help pick it apart!

What I'd really be interested in is how this corresponds to real life, since "it's more realistic" is one of the fig leaves used to justify the new process.

Posted by johnsensing on 12/19/2016 8:36:00 PM (view original):

Posted by mbriese on 12/19/2016 7:25:00 PM (view original):
Interesting. I'd be really curious to see the details behind the players that didn't sign B6. Where did they sign, distance between them and where they signed, etc.

If you've got the data in an excel I'd be happy to help pick it apart!

What I'd really be interested in is how this corresponds to real life, since "it's more realistic" is one of the fig leaves used to justify the new process.

Well here you go. Here are the signings from 2015.

Depends on how you want to judge the AAC. If we consider them 'non B6' then there were 9 top 100 guys. If you put AAC in with the other B6 then it's 4.

11	Stephen Zimmerman	UNLV
35	Dedric Lawson	Memphis
45	Derrick Jones	UNLV
53	K.J. Lawson	Memphis
75	Jeremy Hemsley	SDSU
79	Shake Milton	SMU
81	Nick Marshall	Memphis
85	Steve Enoch	Uconn
90	Nolan Narain	SDSU

Here are the 2016 recruit signings for "non B6"

20	Zach Collins	Zags
31	Alterique Gilbert	Uconn
36	De'Riante Jenkins	VCU
41	Jarron Cumberland	UC
45	Juwan Durham	Uconn
56	DeJon Jarreau	UMass
66	Killian Tillie	Zags
73	Troy Baxter	UNLV
77	Brison Gresham	UMass
78	Vance Jackson	Uconn

Posted by Benis on 12/19/2016 8:59:00 PM (view original):
Here are the 2016 recruit signings for "non B6"

20	Zach Collins	Zags
31	Alterique Gilbert	Uconn
36	De'Riante Jenkins	VCU
41	Jarron Cumberland	UC
45	Juwan Durham	Uconn
56	DeJon Jarreau	UMass
66	Killian Tillie	Zags
73	Troy Baxter	UNLV
77	Brison Gresham	UMass
78	Vance Jackson	Uconn

Crickets Lol!!!!

Posted by Benis on 12/19/2016 8:59:00 PM (view original):
Here are the 2016 recruit signings for "non B6"

20	Zach Collins	Zags
31	Alterique Gilbert	Uconn
36	De'Riante Jenkins	VCU
41	Jarron Cumberland	UC
45	Juwan Durham	Uconn
56	DeJon Jarreau	UMass
66	Killian Tillie	Zags
73	Troy Baxter	UNLV
77	Brison Gresham	UMass
78	Vance Jackson	Uconn

I'm wondering since UConn had that history of being a Big 6 school in the past, if they should be considered a non Big 6 school for the sake of comparison? I'm guessing more than likely with their history of being in the Big East and winning multiple national championships was what allowed them to grab the #31, #45 and #78 guys.

I'm personally curious if there's a way to see NON D1 school signing ranked D1 prospects. I know I just signed 3 of them, albeit not top 100. 1/3 of my D3 roster is projected D1 talent now, we'll see how that works after a few seasons.

Posted by guyo26 on 12/19/2016 9:51:00 PM (view original):
I'm personally curious if there's a way to see NON D1 school signing ranked D1 prospects. I know I just signed 3 of them, albeit not top 100. 1/3 of my D3 roster is projected D1 talent now, we'll see how that works after a few seasons.

I guess it's under another username.

Posted by MikeT23 on 12/19/2016 9:59:00 PM (view original):

Posted by guyo26 on 12/19/2016 9:51:00 PM (view original):
I'm personally curious if there's a way to see NON D1 school signing ranked D1 prospects. I know I just signed 3 of them, albeit not top 100. 1/3 of my D3 roster is projected D1 talent now, we'll see how that works after a few seasons.

I guess it's under another username.

yes, under guyo27. made altid for a d3 challenge in phelan, that has never been a secret

this team

To me, it's allright. We do not want a 90% big six signing... Around 70% is allright. All worlds will have their mid-majors competing. Maybe I will go back A-10 and compete.