I've got 2 players who will start for me at CF and 2B this year. Player A's range makes him more suited for CF than Player B, IMO but I'm not sure if the extra chances he'll get at 2B vs. CF would be worth sticking him at 2B and racking up all the + plays he should make.

What do you guys think? Which guy would play CF and which guy plays 2B for you?

Player A: Range - 86, Glove - 82, Arm Str - 84, Arm Acc - 76
Player B: Range - 76, Glove - 82, Arm Str - 76, Arm Acc - 83

It’s almost a waste to stick either of those players at CF because the above average arm strength and accuracy will be lost.

player A would play well at CF and would be exceptional at 2B. Player B would be below average at CF (the range would really hurt) and would be slightly above average at 2B (the arm would offset the range)

if these were your only 2 options I would go A in CF and B In 2B. If their bats are good and you have time / other options I would go A at second base B at third base and pick up a defensive CF with 85-85-50-50 stats ish. Just an idea.

Assuming they both throw right, Player A in CF and B at 2B.

Player Profile: Karl Karsay - Hardball Dynasty Baseball | WhatIfSports
Player Profile: Nestor Matos - Hardball Dynasty Baseball | WhatIfSports

A CF for sure. Ideally 3B but he'll be good at CF and throwing guys out. Always nice.