Posted by raucous on 4/15/2010 8:24:00 PM (view original):
I just got back. Had to park about 1/2 mile away. I got there too late for the close parking. There was about 1000 to 1200 people there, which was smaller than last year (according to my friend who was at that one as well).

No Sarah Palin, but I saw a sign that said thanks to Sarah Palim. hehehehe

There were a couple of anarchists wandering through the crowd trying to pass out their lit without being caught.

A lot of younger people were speaking and non whites. There were no racial slurs. With all the talk here, I thought I might stick out because I don't own any white sheets.

Carla Howell spoke as well. The crowd was not wild or crazy at all. There even was a Catholic Priest and a Rabbi there. They were not hanging out together though. The priest really suprised me, since the Church is for universal healthcare, without the abortion crap, of course.

2011 Tea Party "protest" is here.  I don't know if it will be a real protest as there will be a pig roast as well. 

Not enough meat.  Chris Christie would be fat enough. 

I guess the Tea Party revolution is already over in Wisconsin...

Posted by antonsirius on 4/6/2011 4:36:00 PM (view original):
I guess the Tea Party revolution is already over in Wisconsin...

The Tea Party are not the professional protesters that the left uses to disrupt normal activites when needed. They have jobs and families and cannot just drop everything anytime they are needed.

When an election is near they will appear again. And again they will tip the tide to the "Right" side!

I realize that in order for the elft to rationalize 2010 they need to denigrate the Tea Party.

The movement is real. The beliefs are real. The penalty for opposing them is real!

Posted by swamphawk22 on 4/6/2011 5:15:00 PM (view original):

Posted by antonsirius on 4/6/2011 4:36:00 PM (view original):
I guess the Tea Party revolution is already over in Wisconsin...

The Tea Party are not the professional protesters that the left uses to disrupt normal activites when needed. They have jobs and families and cannot just drop everything anytime they are needed.

When an election is near they will appear again. And again they will tip the tide to the "Right" side!

You really need to stop commenting on things when you have not even the remotest shred of a clue as to what's being discussed.

They just had an election, fucktard. Like, yesterday.

A small election. Again they are not professional campaigners. They are real people with real obligations.

In these under the radar elections you can often get some off the wall candidate to pull off an upset. No one expected someone as unqualified as Kloppenburg to be taken seriously.

When the recount eliminates some of the "Questionable" ballots I am quite sure that the right person will win.

It wasn't "under the radar" -- although it's obvious it was under your radar, ignorant buffoon that you are. Turnout was 33%, which is crazy high for an election like this. Tons of money poured in on both sides, and even Palin came out and stumped for Walker's boy. And conservative control of the WI Supreme Court was up for grabs.

The result? A 55%-28% primary edge for the incumbent in February became a 200-vote loss.

Also, your backhanded insult of the Tea Party as people who don't care enough about their country to get involved in the political process, or even vote, unless it's what you deem to be a "large" election is completely uncalled for. I hope you apologize to them.

"Under the radar election" - LOL!!!

Where the F have you been, living under a rock?

Posted by antonsirius on 4/7/2011 7:51:00 AM (view original):
It wasn't "under the radar" -- although it's obvious it was under your radar, ignorant buffoon that you are. Turnout was 33%, which is crazy high for an election like this. Tons of money poured in on both sides, and even Palin came out and stumped for Walker's boy. And conservative control of the WI Supreme Court was up for grabs.

The result? A 55%-28% primary edge for the incumbent in February became a 200-vote loss.

Also, your backhanded insult of the Tea Party as people who don't care enough about their country to get involved in the political process, or even vote, unless it's what you deem to be a "large" election is completely uncalled for. I hope you apologize to them.

Well, there were four people running in the primary and Prosser was the only conservative amongst them, so it was really a 55%-45% margin. It's not like 22% of the state changed their viewpoint.

ANDDDDDDD... Prosser back on top...

http://www.jsonline.com/newswatch/119421429.html

Hilarious!

Posted by kermit on 4/7/2011 2:00:00 PM (view original):

Posted by antonsirius on 4/7/2011 7:51:00 AM (view original):
It wasn't "under the radar" -- although it's obvious it was under your radar, ignorant buffoon that you are. Turnout was 33%, which is crazy high for an election like this. Tons of money poured in on both sides, and even Palin came out and stumped for Walker's boy. And conservative control of the WI Supreme Court was up for grabs.

The result? A 55%-28% primary edge for the incumbent in February became a 200-vote loss.

Also, your backhanded insult of the Tea Party as people who don't care enough about their country to get involved in the political process, or even vote, unless it's what you deem to be a "large" election is completely uncalled for. I hope you apologize to them.

Well, there were four people running in the primary and Prosser was the only conservative amongst them, so it was really a 55%-45% margin. It's not like 22% of the state changed their viewpoint.

My bad. I thought one of the three challengers was further right than Prosser, not that all three were Dems.