F*ck Draft V.2.0 Convo Thread Topic

pttsbrghkid
Posts: 4120 (0)
Hall of Famer
2 2 22 8 84 2
Prospect
You guys are killing me.  There is no way this needs to be this confusing.


PICK WHO YOU WANT.  If you pick Markie Post, you get 2011 Markie Post, not 1984 Markie Post.  No matter what pictures you include in your selection announcement.

The ONLY exception to this rule is the 1 P.O.H.(Peak Of Hotness) pick.  And no, making a POH pick should not be mandatory.  But it should be optional.  If you are in your 30s or older, there are going to be lots of babes from the 80s and 70s and 60s that were major influences on your puberty.  Picking one of them and adding them to your roster in a "Bill &Ted" way, where they show up in their classic age/form, is a fun idea.  But at the same time, a roster of 12 ladies of the 70s would go against Utah's original premise for this edition of **** Draft.

That shouldn't stop you.  It's your fantasy.  But don't expect your Betty Page All Stars to be voted on the same way as the 21st Century Foxes.  Maybe try to draft by the spirit of the way Utah propses we do this, and next time set up your own rules, with exclusively those who peaked pre-cable, Silver Screen Era, or anything goes, etc.
1/19/2011 7:24 PM
speedfreak
Posts: 8131 (0)
Hall of Famer
45 2 5
Prospect

tl;dr

1/19/2011 7:42 PM
mudbone1969
Posts: 5019 (0)
Hall of Famer
264 3 2 4
Prospect
I drafted by my own rules.  You turds can follow someone elses.
1/19/2011 7:46 PM
tdkienholz
Posts: 2695 (0)
Pro
6 1 1 3 1
Prospect
Someone has filled the open spot
1/19/2011 7:48 PM
skunk206
Posts: 11380 (0)
Hall of Famer
1395
Hall of Famer
Couldn't resist the swing pick...nothing says fantasy **** draft like two chicks at the same time
1/19/2011 7:56 PM
UtahCubs
Posts: 115 (0)
Hall of Famer
58 7 4 5 39 68 80 1
Prospect
Posted by pttsbrghkid on 1/19/2011 7:26:00 PM (view original):
You guys are killing me.  There is no way this needs to be this confusing.


PICK WHO YOU WANT.  If you pick Markie Post, you get 2011 Markie Post, not 1984 Markie Post.  No matter what pictures you include in your selection announcement.

The ONLY exception to this rule is the 1 P.O.H.(Peak Of Hotness) pick.  And no, making a POH pick should not be mandatory.  But it should be optional.  If you are in your 30s or older, there are going to be lots of babes from the 80s and 70s and 60s that were major influences on your puberty.  Picking one of them and adding them to your roster in a "Bill &Ted" way, where they show up in their classic age/form, is a fun idea.  But at the same time, a roster of 12 ladies of the 70s would go against Utah's original premise for this edition of **** Draft.

That shouldn't stop you.  It's your fantasy.  But don't expect your Betty Page All Stars to be voted on the same way as the 21st Century Foxes.  Maybe try to draft by the spirit of the way Utah propses we do this, and next time set up your own rules, with exclusively those who peaked pre-cable, Silver Screen Era, or anything goes, etc.
THIS
1/19/2011 7:57 PM
tdkienholz
Posts: 2695 (0)
Pro
6 1 1 3 1
Prospect
Posted by skunk206 on 1/19/2011 7:56:00 PM (view original):
Couldn't resist the swing pick...nothing says fantasy **** draft like two chicks at the same time
That's true. Welcome aboard.
1/19/2011 7:57 PM
rydart25
Posts: 6463 (0)
Hall of Famer
3 147 7 45 1
Prospect
Welcome skunk.
1/19/2011 8:03 PM
UtahCubs
Posts: 115 (0)
Hall of Famer
58 7 4 5 39 68 80 1
Prospect
Posted by UtahCubs on 1/19/2011 4:39:00 PM (view original):
Considering hockey hasn't even heard of half the girls picked so far. I'm predicting he makes one of the worst picks of the 1st round next.
Well, I was wrong. Hockey took who I was really hoping would fall back to me. Elisha Cuthbert was 1A on my big board.
1/19/2011 8:03 PM
swamphawk22
Posts: 13021 (0)
Hall of Famer
9 4 8 3 84 113 36
Prospect
Posted by pttsbrghkid on 1/19/2011 7:26:00 PM (view original):
You guys are killing me.  There is no way this needs to be this confusing.


PICK WHO YOU WANT.  If you pick Markie Post, you get 2011 Markie Post, not 1984 Markie Post.  No matter what pictures you include in your selection announcement.

The ONLY exception to this rule is the 1 P.O.H.(Peak Of Hotness) pick.  And no, making a POH pick should not be mandatory.  But it should be optional.  If you are in your 30s or older, there are going to be lots of babes from the 80s and 70s and 60s that were major influences on your puberty.  Picking one of them and adding them to your roster in a "Bill &Ted" way, where they show up in their classic age/form, is a fun idea.  But at the same time, a roster of 12 ladies of the 70s would go against Utah's original premise for this edition of **** Draft.

That shouldn't stop you.  It's your fantasy.  But don't expect your Betty Page All Stars to be voted on the same way as the 21st Century Foxes.  Maybe try to draft by the spirit of the way Utah propses we do this, and next time set up your own rules, with exclusively those who peaked pre-cable, Silver Screen Era, or anything goes, etc.
So if we do make a POH and give you the pic we want her judged on, will she be judged by the same standard as the current ladies?
1/19/2011 8:08 PM
mudbone1969
Posts: 5019 (0)
Hall of Famer
264 3 2 4
Prospect
So is round 12 the PoH round or can it be any pick?  If it's any pick, it needs to be designated so I and other can properly assign a grade.
1/19/2011 8:08 PM
rydart25
Posts: 6463 (0)
Hall of Famer
3 147 7 45 1
Prospect
Posted by UtahCubs on 1/19/2011 8:03:00 PM (view original):
Posted by UtahCubs on 1/19/2011 4:39:00 PM (view original):
Considering hockey hasn't even heard of half the girls picked so far. I'm predicting he makes one of the worst picks of the 1st round next.
Well, I was wrong. Hockey took who I was really hoping would fall back to me. Elisha Cuthbert was 1A on my big board.
The bastard
1/19/2011 8:11 PM
marloweou812
Posts: 19 (0)
Hall of Famer
17 46
Prospect
All I ask is for a clarification of the rules. I think it's hard to prove the year/month of a pic if there is any kind of limit on that, especially the older the pic gets. I think it's hard to prove anybody's period of hotness. At 42, I think my period of hotness is today. But I guarantee my 4 kids would probably say it was at least 10 years ago, lol!!

And along with ptts comment, I apologize for ******* off anybody younger than me, just trying to make a point. I am sure there are many draftees who caught my eye maybe for only one appearance, tv show, movie, etc. that you don't know about because 20 years ago the form of media was a whole lot smaller than today. On the other side of the coin, with so many more options around now, I am sure there are many draftees I have never seen. 

Again, majority rules.... So Utah, sitemail me with your decision, this is your draft and it's supposed to be fun!!

BTW, the last draft was never voted on so I have no idea why I am arguing!!

1/19/2011 8:24 PM (edited)
hockey1984
Posts: 2748 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 1 7 172 100 3 105
Prospect
Posted by UtahCubs on 1/19/2011 8:03:00 PM (view original):
Posted by UtahCubs on 1/19/2011 4:39:00 PM (view original):
Considering hockey hasn't even heard of half the girls picked so far. I'm predicting he makes one of the worst picks of the 1st round next.
Well, I was wrong. Hockey took who I was really hoping would fall back to me. Elisha Cuthbert was 1A on my big board.
BWAHAHAHAHA!!!  UP YOURS CHILDREN!!! Yah I knew she wouldn't last long. I've got a few other girls that will probabally go down as horrible picks. But we'll save that mess for later. I have a feeling no one else will pick them before me.
1/19/2011 8:13 PM
UtahCubs
Posts: 115 (0)
Hall of Famer
58 7 4 5 39 68 80 1
Prospect
Posted by mudbone1969 on 1/19/2011 8:08:00 PM (view original):
So is round 12 the PoH round or can it be any pick?  If it's any pick, it needs to be designated so I and other can properly assign a grade.
I'll count the votes tonight and let ya know.
1/19/2011 8:13 PM
◂ Prev 1...10|11|12|13|14...63 Next ▸
F*ck Draft V.2.0 Convo Thread Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.