don't you mean cocktail weenie?

Posted by jrd_x on 6/15/2012 5:40:00 PM (view original):
Are you admitting that your analogy is nonsense?

Why would you think I'm admitting any such thing?

Aren't all of your analogies nonsense?

Aren't your analogies complete bullshit?

Do I tend to argue using analogies?

Do you tend to argue using dumbass blog links?

Don't you think my sources are reliable and convincing?

Do you know the qualifications of bloggers?

Aren't the qualifications of the professors/economists that I have cited recently included in my posts?

EDIT:  If they aren't, here they are:
David Glasner - Economist at the Federal Trade Commission
Greg Mankiw - Harvard Econ Professor and former Bush adviser
Matt Yglesias - Author and Harvard Grad
Paul Krugman - Nobel prize winning economist and Princeton Professor
Mark Thoma - Econ Professor at U of Oregon
Olivier Blanchard - Head economist at the IMF

That looks like a bunch of know nothing, booger eating, bloggers, doesn't it?

It's obvious that those writers are credible, smarter than both of us, and correct about a little more inflation helping the economy, isn't it?

Isn't it obvious that I don't necessarily think one man's opinion is always right just because he has a nice title?

If I did wouldn't I say "Obama knows best" and be done with it?  Would any of us ever question the opinion of someone higher on the totem pole again?

Do you not think Obama is smarter than you?  Assuming your answer is "yes. he's smarter" shouldn't you STFU and never question or disagree with his policies?

Don't you think there's a difference between disagreeing with someone smarter than you (which you obviously aren't afraid of) and understanding that certain subjects require a great deal of education and technical knowledge, and that when experts put forward an idea that seems contrary to what you think, that maybe you're the one who is missing something?