Posted by cccp1014 on 2/26/2019 11:18:00 AM (view original):Posted by bad_luck on 2/26/2019 11:08:00 AM (view original):Posted by cccp1014 on 2/26/2019 10:16:00 AM (view original):Right. So they should pay more. I get it now and you're more or less a bookkeeper not a revenue generator. I finally understand your crazy thought process. Not on the weird trans rights but at least on the economy and such. Haha I’m actually in sales. You said you sit in an office all day? Doesn’t compute
Posted by bad_luck on 2/26/2019 11:08:00 AM (view original):Posted by cccp1014 on 2/26/2019 10:16:00 AM (view original):Right. So they should pay more. I get it now and you're more or less a bookkeeper not a revenue generator. I finally understand your crazy thought process. Not on the weird trans rights but at least on the economy and such. Haha I’m actually in sales.
Posted by cccp1014 on 2/26/2019 10:16:00 AM (view original):Right. So they should pay more. I get it now and you're more or less a bookkeeper not a revenue generator. I finally understand your crazy thought process. Not on the weird trans rights but at least on the economy and such.
Posted by bad_luck on 2/26/2019 11:17:00 AM (view original):Posted by gomiami1972 on 2/26/2019 10:51:00 AM (view original):Posted by bad_luck on 2/26/2019 9:52:00 AM (view original):Posted by gomiami1972 on 2/25/2019 10:31:00 PM (view original):Posted by bad_luck on 2/25/2019 10:00:00 PM (view original):Posted by gomiami1972 on 2/24/2019 2:57:00 PM (view original):Honest question to - bad_luck, tang, taint, bob, wylie, the chuckster... No hidden agenda at all with this one. I am simply curious. For those that believe in Climate Change theory, how do you take account of the impact with the massive increase in human population? Industrialization (Agricultural Revolution) is what has allowed for the population to explode. The simple fact that we are breeding like rabbits would be causing severe environmental pressure on its own.Missed this. I don’t think I understand the question though. Not to get back into it but what I was driving at is this. How is the distinction made within Climate Change theory between the impact from unnecessary/decadent??? man-made pollution and human population pressure on the environment? Even if 8 billion people are the greenest folk in the universe, 8 billion will be producing more, than at any other time in recorded history, pollution, water usage, soil exhaustion, etc. than the 1 billion that were on the planet as recently as 1804, if for nothing else, out of sheer numbers. I don't know how else to describe it.I don’t think there is a distinction. The idea isn’t that we need to somehow separate the “necessary damage” from the “unnecessary damage.” It’s that we need to take whatever steps we can to limit all damage. That's too bad. My statement was intentionally vague to give the respondent latitude but I was hoping for more. How do we address the damaging effects of over-population on the environment? Why, by taking steps to limit the damage of population growth on the environment, of course! OK, thats for that, lol. I'll just let it go...Are we overpopulated?
Posted by gomiami1972 on 2/26/2019 10:51:00 AM (view original):Posted by bad_luck on 2/26/2019 9:52:00 AM (view original):Posted by gomiami1972 on 2/25/2019 10:31:00 PM (view original):Posted by bad_luck on 2/25/2019 10:00:00 PM (view original):Posted by gomiami1972 on 2/24/2019 2:57:00 PM (view original):Honest question to - bad_luck, tang, taint, bob, wylie, the chuckster... No hidden agenda at all with this one. I am simply curious. For those that believe in Climate Change theory, how do you take account of the impact with the massive increase in human population? Industrialization (Agricultural Revolution) is what has allowed for the population to explode. The simple fact that we are breeding like rabbits would be causing severe environmental pressure on its own.Missed this. I don’t think I understand the question though. Not to get back into it but what I was driving at is this. How is the distinction made within Climate Change theory between the impact from unnecessary/decadent??? man-made pollution and human population pressure on the environment? Even if 8 billion people are the greenest folk in the universe, 8 billion will be producing more, than at any other time in recorded history, pollution, water usage, soil exhaustion, etc. than the 1 billion that were on the planet as recently as 1804, if for nothing else, out of sheer numbers. I don't know how else to describe it.I don’t think there is a distinction. The idea isn’t that we need to somehow separate the “necessary damage” from the “unnecessary damage.” It’s that we need to take whatever steps we can to limit all damage. That's too bad. My statement was intentionally vague to give the respondent latitude but I was hoping for more. How do we address the damaging effects of over-population on the environment? Why, by taking steps to limit the damage of population growth on the environment, of course! OK, thats for that, lol. I'll just let it go...
Posted by bad_luck on 2/26/2019 9:52:00 AM (view original):Posted by gomiami1972 on 2/25/2019 10:31:00 PM (view original):Posted by bad_luck on 2/25/2019 10:00:00 PM (view original):Posted by gomiami1972 on 2/24/2019 2:57:00 PM (view original):Honest question to - bad_luck, tang, taint, bob, wylie, the chuckster... No hidden agenda at all with this one. I am simply curious. For those that believe in Climate Change theory, how do you take account of the impact with the massive increase in human population? Industrialization (Agricultural Revolution) is what has allowed for the population to explode. The simple fact that we are breeding like rabbits would be causing severe environmental pressure on its own.Missed this. I don’t think I understand the question though. Not to get back into it but what I was driving at is this. How is the distinction made within Climate Change theory between the impact from unnecessary/decadent??? man-made pollution and human population pressure on the environment? Even if 8 billion people are the greenest folk in the universe, 8 billion will be producing more, than at any other time in recorded history, pollution, water usage, soil exhaustion, etc. than the 1 billion that were on the planet as recently as 1804, if for nothing else, out of sheer numbers. I don't know how else to describe it.I don’t think there is a distinction. The idea isn’t that we need to somehow separate the “necessary damage” from the “unnecessary damage.” It’s that we need to take whatever steps we can to limit all damage.
Posted by gomiami1972 on 2/25/2019 10:31:00 PM (view original):Posted by bad_luck on 2/25/2019 10:00:00 PM (view original):Posted by gomiami1972 on 2/24/2019 2:57:00 PM (view original):Honest question to - bad_luck, tang, taint, bob, wylie, the chuckster... No hidden agenda at all with this one. I am simply curious. For those that believe in Climate Change theory, how do you take account of the impact with the massive increase in human population? Industrialization (Agricultural Revolution) is what has allowed for the population to explode. The simple fact that we are breeding like rabbits would be causing severe environmental pressure on its own.Missed this. I don’t think I understand the question though. Not to get back into it but what I was driving at is this. How is the distinction made within Climate Change theory between the impact from unnecessary/decadent??? man-made pollution and human population pressure on the environment? Even if 8 billion people are the greenest folk in the universe, 8 billion will be producing more, than at any other time in recorded history, pollution, water usage, soil exhaustion, etc. than the 1 billion that were on the planet as recently as 1804, if for nothing else, out of sheer numbers. I don't know how else to describe it.
Posted by bad_luck on 2/25/2019 10:00:00 PM (view original):Posted by gomiami1972 on 2/24/2019 2:57:00 PM (view original):Honest question to - bad_luck, tang, taint, bob, wylie, the chuckster... No hidden agenda at all with this one. I am simply curious. For those that believe in Climate Change theory, how do you take account of the impact with the massive increase in human population? Industrialization (Agricultural Revolution) is what has allowed for the population to explode. The simple fact that we are breeding like rabbits would be causing severe environmental pressure on its own.Missed this. I don’t think I understand the question though.
Posted by gomiami1972 on 2/24/2019 2:57:00 PM (view original):Honest question to - bad_luck, tang, taint, bob, wylie, the chuckster... No hidden agenda at all with this one. I am simply curious. For those that believe in Climate Change theory, how do you take account of the impact with the massive increase in human population? Industrialization (Agricultural Revolution) is what has allowed for the population to explode. The simple fact that we are breeding like rabbits would be causing severe environmental pressure on its own.
Posted by bad_luck on 2/26/2019 11:31:00 AM (view original):Posted by cccp1014 on 2/26/2019 11:18:00 AM (view original):Posted by bad_luck on 2/26/2019 11:08:00 AM (view original):Posted by cccp1014 on 2/26/2019 10:16:00 AM (view original):Right. So they should pay more. I get it now and you're more or less a bookkeeper not a revenue generator. I finally understand your crazy thought process. Not on the weird trans rights but at least on the economy and such. Haha I’m actually in sales. You said you sit in an office all day? Doesn’t computeA lot of my clients are in other states. Commercial insurance doesn’t have to be a face to face thing. I can do the vast majority of my work over the phone.
Posted by cccp1014 on 2/26/2019 11:43:00 AM (view original):Posted by bad_luck on 2/26/2019 11:31:00 AM (view original):Posted by cccp1014 on 2/26/2019 11:18:00 AM (view original):Posted by bad_luck on 2/26/2019 11:08:00 AM (view original):Posted by cccp1014 on 2/26/2019 10:16:00 AM (view original):Right. So they should pay more. I get it now and you're more or less a bookkeeper not a revenue generator. I finally understand your crazy thought process. Not on the weird trans rights but at least on the economy and such. Haha I’m actually in sales. You said you sit in an office all day? Doesn’t computeA lot of my clients are in other states. Commercial insurance doesn’t have to be a face to face thing. I can do the vast majority of my work over the phone. It doesn’t but I am in sales and I have clients in other states and I am constantly on the road. Hence like now I have time to post.
Posted by gomiami1972 on 2/26/2019 11:38:00 AM (view original):Posted by bad_luck on 2/26/2019 11:17:00 AM (view original):Posted by gomiami1972 on 2/26/2019 10:51:00 AM (view original):Posted by bad_luck on 2/26/2019 9:52:00 AM (view original):Posted by gomiami1972 on 2/25/2019 10:31:00 PM (view original):Posted by bad_luck on 2/25/2019 10:00:00 PM (view original):Posted by gomiami1972 on 2/24/2019 2:57:00 PM (view original):Honest question to - bad_luck, tang, taint, bob, wylie, the chuckster... No hidden agenda at all with this one. I am simply curious. For those that believe in Climate Change theory, how do you take account of the impact with the massive increase in human population? Industrialization (Agricultural Revolution) is what has allowed for the population to explode. The simple fact that we are breeding like rabbits would be causing severe environmental pressure on its own.Missed this. I don’t think I understand the question though. Not to get back into it but what I was driving at is this. How is the distinction made within Climate Change theory between the impact from unnecessary/decadent??? man-made pollution and human population pressure on the environment? Even if 8 billion people are the greenest folk in the universe, 8 billion will be producing more, than at any other time in recorded history, pollution, water usage, soil exhaustion, etc. than the 1 billion that were on the planet as recently as 1804, if for nothing else, out of sheer numbers. I don't know how else to describe it.I don’t think there is a distinction. The idea isn’t that we need to somehow separate the “necessary damage” from the “unnecessary damage.” It’s that we need to take whatever steps we can to limit all damage. That's too bad. My statement was intentionally vague to give the respondent latitude but I was hoping for more. How do we address the damaging effects of over-population on the environment? Why, by taking steps to limit the damage of population growth on the environment, of course! OK, thats for that, lol. I'll just let it go...Are we overpopulated?hehe. The Art of Saying Nothing.
Posted by bad_luck on 2/26/2019 11:49:00 AM (view original):Posted by cccp1014 on 2/26/2019 11:43:00 AM (view original):Posted by bad_luck on 2/26/2019 11:31:00 AM (view original):Posted by cccp1014 on 2/26/2019 11:18:00 AM (view original):Posted by bad_luck on 2/26/2019 11:08:00 AM (view original):Posted by cccp1014 on 2/26/2019 10:16:00 AM (view original):Right. So they should pay more. I get it now and you're more or less a bookkeeper not a revenue generator. I finally understand your crazy thought process. Not on the weird trans rights but at least on the economy and such. Haha I’m actually in sales. You said you sit in an office all day? Doesn’t computeA lot of my clients are in other states. Commercial insurance doesn’t have to be a face to face thing. I can do the vast majority of my work over the phone. It doesn’t but I am in sales and I have clients in other states and I am constantly on the road. Hence like now I have time to post.Ok. We work in different fields. Why would you assume your business is the same as mine?
Posted by bad_luck on 2/26/2019 11:50:00 AM (view original):Posted by gomiami1972 on 2/26/2019 11:38:00 AM (view original):Posted by bad_luck on 2/26/2019 11:17:00 AM (view original):Posted by gomiami1972 on 2/26/2019 10:51:00 AM (view original):Posted by bad_luck on 2/26/2019 9:52:00 AM (view original):Posted by gomiami1972 on 2/25/2019 10:31:00 PM (view original):Posted by bad_luck on 2/25/2019 10:00:00 PM (view original):Posted by gomiami1972 on 2/24/2019 2:57:00 PM (view original):Honest question to - bad_luck, tang, taint, bob, wylie, the chuckster... No hidden agenda at all with this one. I am simply curious. For those that believe in Climate Change theory, how do you take account of the impact with the massive increase in human population? Industrialization (Agricultural Revolution) is what has allowed for the population to explode. The simple fact that we are breeding like rabbits would be causing severe environmental pressure on its own.Missed this. I don’t think I understand the question though. Not to get back into it but what I was driving at is this. How is the distinction made within Climate Change theory between the impact from unnecessary/decadent??? man-made pollution and human population pressure on the environment? Even if 8 billion people are the greenest folk in the universe, 8 billion will be producing more, than at any other time in recorded history, pollution, water usage, soil exhaustion, etc. than the 1 billion that were on the planet as recently as 1804, if for nothing else, out of sheer numbers. I don't know how else to describe it.I don’t think there is a distinction. The idea isn’t that we need to somehow separate the “necessary damage” from the “unnecessary damage.” It’s that we need to take whatever steps we can to limit all damage. That's too bad. My statement was intentionally vague to give the respondent latitude but I was hoping for more. How do we address the damaging effects of over-population on the environment? Why, by taking steps to limit the damage of population growth on the environment, of course! OK, thats for that, lol. I'll just let it go...Are we overpopulated?hehe. The Art of Saying Nothing.I’m not trying to say nothing. It’s a genuine question. We have a lot of people or earth is different from we have too many people on earth.
Posted by wylie715 on 2/26/2019 12:08:00 PM (view original):je ne parle francais!
Posted by bad_luck on 2/26/2019 12:02:00 PM (view original):I work in a very niche market. There aren’t many brokers that write the business I write. I don’t have to schmooze or make fancy presentations. The client pool knows me, I’ve already done the leg-work.
Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement
© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.