that's funny dino

there is such a world of difference between the potentially negligent or misfeasance acts vs the intentional malfeasance acts of those acting in concert with a national adversary if not enemy......the question being looked into is whether or not treason has taken place.

Why has an outlet like CNN posted nothing regarding these imminent indictments?

the treason would actually be the illegal activities of sharing classified information. if classified secrets are shared with 1 unauthorized person the investigation should be into who else received said info and for what purpose

Posted by rjj4191 on 5/7/2017 1:34:00 PM (view original):
or they are answering for their own misdeeds. or just another attempt to make trump look bad we shall see

That's funny bc Richy Rich certainly doesn't need any assistance to look bad. He seems to do that very well all by himself, pretty much everytime opens his mouth. Lol

But i understand what u mean bc whether mistakenly or deliberately, Hillary was at fault about her emails. But i think that pales in comparison to the magnitude of the scandals surrounding Trump and he's only been in office barely four months. You say there's no "evidence", but it's a FACT that Russia influenced our election, which is why Obama imposed sanctions. It's also a FACT that search warrants have been issued, that grand juries have convened and that indictments have been handed down which simply does not happen without any 'evidence'. You and i, and the rest of the general public just haven't been made privy to it. Whether Trump HIMSELF was indicted is irrelevant bc once the smaller fish are threatened with prison, people start rolling over and will tell Big Brother about the big fish. There's even reports all over the internet that Boris Epshteyne paid the Russian hackers on BEHALF of Team Trump and that Carter Page (or whatever his name is) allegedly went to Russia with a tape recording of Trump promising favorable treatment to Russia if they help him win the election. I'm not saying i personally believe that Trump would be dumb enough to make such a recording, but the reports are out there. And when you combine these things with the well known fact that Flynn and Manafort were indeed in contact with the Russians, there's plenty of both direct and circumstantial evidence that doesn't look too good for Trump.

But it's not just about Russia. They're also investigating for possible violations of the RICO Act under the theory that our sitting President may be complicit in money laundering for the Russians. A simple google search would reveal that Trump receives a shitload of money from the Russians in the form of 'investments' or sale of a property, and that several intelligence agencies intercepted an inordinate number of communications to and from Trump Tower (and informed our government about it) from Russian figures (including a former KGB operative) who the intelligence world consider spies and whom are known to be involved in money laundering. Does anyone really believe the Russians are dumb enough to buy a $50 million property from Trump for $90 million? Well, it happened, and it's called money laundering!

if indeed indictments are handed down (and after just double checking on bipartisan.com) indictments are not FACT ye,t then instead of spectulating over every #fakenews website (of which bipartisan may be one) how about we actually wait and see what they are about. as i said before if in FACT trump has committed crimes then hang him high and let pence take over. and yes we all agree russia hack the dnc computers which let them into john podesta's computer which revealed damaging information about criminal activities of the dnc and yes we all agree russia revealed this info to wikileaks oh boo hoo the democrats got caught with their hands in the cookie jar so to speak and it went public. here's and idea increase our national security so this can't happen again i mean does anyone possibly think this is the first and only time something like this has happened and that we hav'nt done it too. oh wait if we kill the messenger then maybe noone will look at the message

Posted by DoctorKz on 5/7/2017 6:57:00 PM (view original):
Why has an outlet like CNN posted nothing regarding these imminent indictments?

Why has Trump not released his tax returns to disprove any Russian theories?

Good question. I wish he would. I wonder if a grand jury has/can subpoena them, if deemed vital to an investigation. We shall see.

But the Federal Election Commission had financial requirements. I am assuming that Trump met those requirements. So I don't see why at this point the public has to have access to them. Who knows if his audit claims are factual. If so, I guess we will have to wait. Unless they are leaked...

Speaking of which...Why hasn't Assange released more? He claimed only 1% of what he had was made public...

Buffet was under audit...he released his returns. The dumbest reasoning ever.

can anyone explain how the tax returns prove anything I may be wrong but when I do my s corp returns I don't list any business dealings just numbers is trump taxes somehow different besides the fact that I make 60k and he makes 60b

Does he?

I don't know or really care but was seriously asking for a answer I know the audit papers would have details of dealings but do the tax returns and are audit papers a matter of public knowledge

I hope he releases everything. And please remember that we just witnessed 8 years of an administration fighting tooth and nail against FOIA requests, taking the fifth, refusing to testify, feet dragging in the State Department. All after Obama promised the most transparent administration we will ever see, so please excuse me if I see all this as just a bit hypocritical...

Judicial Watch is still in court trying to get documents from the Obama administration. Some were to be handed over years ago. They are still resisting...