LIVE is DEAD Topic

braveboy73
Posts: 1032 (0)
Hall of Famer
376 1 2 1
Prospect
Personally i think for being a computer generated game. I think it is pretty realistic myself. Good Job WhatifSports.
9/18/2009 1:15 PM
szczubelek
Posts: 22792 (16)
Hall of Famer
2089 4 6 48
Pro
despite the glitches I enjoy playing it most of the time. I would probably be out boozing and whoring around if it wasn't for WIS.

hmmm...maybe I should re think this
9/18/2009 1:30 PM
kbaseball09
Posts: 187 (0)
Hall of Famer
137 22 25 3
Prospect
I should think if there is a cs department they should kiss our behind to forward the product. From what I here the cs department is very very bad. That is really confusing to me. What with the economy is the way it is right now. I've seen business in my neighborhood here in Brooklyn treat customers bad i.e. convenience stores. Why is that they don't know what they are doing. Hey I don't get it i don't understand why. Sim live play is down significantly is it not dead per se, but it is down. I don't understand why the half million users do not want to use this part of the product. Maybe some of the things that happen in the sim are extreme randomness but i think that might be par for the course. Anyway this is my contribution to this thread. I hope to play against you guys someday. Please comment and have a happy and a healthy day. Thank you
9/18/2009 4:53 PM
habsfan1
Posts: 4006 (0)
Hall of Famer
748 1 5 104 20 109 11
Veteran
I personally have had no issues with customer service. I have run over 100 leagues, and have never had a problem with a quick response in order to correct an issue. Sure, there are some minor issues in the game play (very minor in my opinion), but both sides play by the same rules. Sometimes I wonder if those that say it is dead, just want it to be dead for whatever reason. Enjoy the product for what it is...a break from the day to day grind.
9/18/2009 5:05 PM
joshkvt
Posts: 6200 (0)
Hall of Famer
664 99
All Star
Quote: Originally posted by braveboy73 on 9/18/2009Personally i think for being a computer generated game.  I think it is pretty realistic myself.  Good Job WhatifSports.
Couldn't agree more. Most of the complaints about bunts (other than the squeeze success rate) come down to realizing that just because you call for a bunt, doesn't mean it will happen. If a batter gets two strikes, he is going to swing away. So a 6-4-3 DP on a bunt, or a home run or fly to deep LF, just means the batter was unable to get a bunt down.

I think c/s does a fine job. I wish more resources were put into live, but if I ran a business that had one aspect accounting for 95% of my revenue and another that accounted for 5%, the former would get most of my attention. There's a difference between what support can't do (and apparently the relief-pitcher-facing-a-batter bug would falls into this category) and what they won't do.

Seriously, if Live annoys someone so much, just stop playing it. Problem solved.
9/18/2009 5:35 PM
joshkvt
Posts: 6200 (0)
Hall of Famer
664 99
All Star
Oh yeah, and if you like the product, join some of the leagues I have that are within a few owners of filling
9/18/2009 5:36 PM
habsfan1
Posts: 4006 (0)
Hall of Famer
748 1 5 104 20 109 11
Veteran
Quote: Originally Posted By joshkvt on 9/18/2009
Quote: Originally posted by braveboy73 on 9/18/2009 Personally i think for being a computer generated game. I think it is pretty realistic myself. Good Job WhatifSports.
Couldn't agree more. Most of the complaints about bunts (other than the squeeze success rate) come down to realizing that just because you call for a bunt, doesn't mean it will happen. If a batter gets two strikes, he is going to swing away. So a 6-4-3 DP on a bunt, or a home run or fly to deep LF, just means the batter was unable to get a bunt down.

I think c/s does a fine job. I wish more resources were put into live, but if I ran a business that had one aspect accounting for 95% of my revenue and another that accounted for 5%, the former would get most of my attention. There's a difference between what support can't do (and apparently the relief-pitcher-facing-a-batter bug would falls into this category) and what they won't do.

Seriously, if Live annoys someone so much, just stop playing it. Problem solved
Missed the above post by braveboy on my first read through....100% agree. Oh...and you too josh!
9/18/2009 5:39 PM
The Taint
Posts: 13151 (2)
Hall of Famer
1054 3
Hall of Famer
Quote: Originally Posted By joshkvt on 9/18/2009
Quote: Originally posted by braveboy73 on 9/18/2009 Personally i think for being a computer generated game. I think it is pretty realistic myself. Good Job WhatifSports.
Couldn't agree more. Most of the complaints about bunts (other than the squeeze success rate) come down to realizing that just because you call for a bunt, doesn't mean it will happen. If a batter gets two strikes, he is going to swing away. So a 6-4-3 DP on a bunt, or a home run or fly to deep LF, just means the batter was unable to get a bunt down.

I think c/s does a fine job. I wish more resources were put into live, but if I ran a business that had one aspect accounting for 95% of my revenue and another that accounted for 5%, the former would get most of my attention. There's a difference between what support can't do (and apparently the relief-pitcher-facing-a-batter bug would falls into this category) and what they won't do.

Seriously, if Live annoys someone so much, just stop playing it. Problem solved


Yup, you get walks on bunt attempts also.
9/18/2009 7:29 PM
arvidjosef
Posts: 3545 (0)
Hall of Famer
424 29 9 7
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By donaldjtrump on 9/17/2009The glitch that dictates that when a reliever comes in and allows a batter to reach on something other than a hit or a walk, that the batter doesn't count towards the relievers batters-faced total and therefore you have to leave in the reliever for another batter whether you want to or not. And God help you if the second batter also reaches on an HBP or an error because the reliever will then have to face a third batter against your will
This exact scenario just happened to me.
10/23/2009 10:01 PM
arvidjosef
Posts: 3545 (0)
Hall of Famer
424 29 9 7
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By arvidjosef on 10/23/2009
Quote: Originally Posted By donaldjtrump on 9/17/2009
The glitch that dictates that when a reliever comes in and allows a batter to reach on something other than a hit or a walk, that the batter doesn't count towards the relievers batters-faced total and therefore you have to leave in the reliever for another batter whether you want to or not. And God help you if the second batter also reaches on an HBP or an error because the reliever will then have to face a third batter against your will.
This exact scenario just happened to me.
10/23/2009 10:01 PM
arvidjosef
Posts: 3545 (0)
Hall of Famer
424 29 9 7
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By arvidjosef on 10/23/2009
Quote: Originally Posted By arvidjosef on 10/23/2009

Quote: Originally Posted By donaldjtrump on 9/17/2009
The glitch that dictates that when a reliever comes in and allows a batter to reach on something other than a hit or a walk, that the batter doesn't count towards the relievers batters-faced total and therefore you have to leave in the reliever for another batter whether you want to or not. And God help you if the second batter also reaches on an HBP or an error because the reliever will then have to face a third batter against your will.
This exact scenario just happened to me.
10/23/2009 10:01 PM
arvidjosef
Posts: 3545 (0)
Hall of Famer
424 29 9 7
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By arvidjosef on 10/23/2009
Quote: Originally Posted By arvidjosef on 10/23/2009

Quote: Originally Posted By arvidjosef on 10/23/2009

Quote: Originally Posted By donaldjtrump on 9/17/2009
The glitch that dictates that when a reliever comes in and allows a batter to reach on something other than a hit or a walk, that the batter doesn't count towards the relievers batters-faced total and therefore you have to leave in the reliever for another batter whether you want to or not. And God help you if the second batter also reaches on an HBP or an error because the reliever will then have to face a third batter against your will.
This exact scenario just happened to me.
10/23/2009 10:01 PM
gusv
Posts: 852 (0)
Hall of Famer
260
Prospect

No picking on any of my friends, but the RP glitch has not happened to me ... yet? ...

From my observation, the high squeeze bunt success is the only major thing that i can think of fixing ...

As for if there was no WIS, what would I do? ... I would probably relapse and be out boozing and whoring around like szczubelek says he would! ...
10/24/2009 2:07 AM
barcafan1
Posts: 2 (0)
Hall of Famer
44 3 1 1 16
Prospect
There are things that could be fixed (many already mentioned) but overall I enjoy live alot. I have definitely experienced the RP glitch on many occasions. The effectiveness of the suicide bunt is too high. I would love a no sub warning message that would allow me at least a few seconds to react other then an immediate quick pitch.

Otherwise, customer service has been great to me and I still enjoy live.
10/25/2009 11:56 AM
metsfan33333
Posts: 93 (0)
Hall of Famer
218
Prospect
Whatif rules they should ban this *** clown kharris forever
10/27/2009 9:10 PM
◂ Prev 123 Next ▸
LIVE is DEAD Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.