Who was the most Topic

Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 1/20/2010
Quote: Originally posted by metsmax on 1/20/2010 OMG, this poll ignores the context - I mean, you have to look at how annoying others were at the time - I have a web site that rates the annoyingness of posters. If you use a scheme like that you can calculate a Context Adjusted Annoyingness Factor, which is the only fair way to address this issue. Those bozos who dont see this are just a closed minded bunch of HD apologists who are all against me.

I think I need a link to this site
thanks for nothing z, that has already been discussed earlier in the thread, when will you add something to the discussion
1/20/2010 5:18 PM
When the close-minded open their minds, then they would see how much I do add.
1/20/2010 5:19 PM
I resemble those remarks
1/20/2010 5:27 PM
I would just like to state that I was 12 when I started on this site. I'm not surprised I was constantly ripped into in the forums. If a 12 year old came in here now it would be the same thing lol.
1/20/2010 5:44 PM
Also, I would vote for myself. About 5,000 of my posts or so came from the first year that i was on this site. I would make like 5 threads a day and reply to every single thread. I would pay to see some of my old posts... Ive gone on the internet archive thing and just looked at some of the thread titles and started laughing.
1/20/2010 5:46 PM
Furry. Guy had one bad d3 team and was on every single thread telling people how to coach.
1/20/2010 6:16 PM
tmac, you have restored my faith in humanity.
1/20/2010 6:38 PM
Quote: Originally posted by mullycj on 1/20/2010irritating poster in their 1st 6 months on HD forums.  (please dont let the most recent memories cloud your vote) a) tmacfan12 (1)b) furry_nips (3)c) colonels19 (edit : consider last 6 months)d) swamphawk22e) a_in_the_bf) Other (insert name) (1) 

Tmac get a pass, he was only a kid, can't fault him too much.

Furry never really bothered me. I was surprised to see a_in_the_b on this, unless there was something I missed.

Swamphawk, at least he kept his business in one political thread, never really read any of it.

Colonels gets my vote, hands down. You thought he was bad now, can't believe people don't remember him from a few years ago. He was much harsher back then, but more persistent and irritating now. In the past month, he must have about 10,000 posts and about 9,000 has to do with BPI/RPI.
1/20/2010 6:57 PM
tdowdy, hands down.
1/20/2010 7:40 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By vandydave on 1/20/2010jakuru
wasn't most of his obnoxiousness spent on the coaches corners?
1/20/2010 8:27 PM
tmac and furry have since redeemed themselves pretty well, so it's tough to really condemn them...

my vote is either colonels or furry (i think the age difference gives him the edge over tmac), and in a photo finish i go with the Colonel.
1/20/2010 9:35 PM
I don't know why ab is on it, other then his cap thing he does. Swamp is annoying, but he does keep his stuff out of a lot of topics. Wasn't around when tmac was super annoying, but even a year or 2 ago he was pretty annoying. IMO, the guy would be that spank_me kid. He was repeatedly banned from other games (even HD) flooded the forums/coach corners and was even so bad users made RL threats to him. I don't think anyone can or will top him.
1/20/2010 10:02 PM
I don't know about his first 6 months, but vegaskevin in his prime was pretty annoying. He has since been replaced by zhawks.
1/20/2010 10:17 PM
It's not even close....colonels.
1/20/2010 10:32 PM
I just read the "ignore" thread (or as much of it as I could stomach), and I have to change my vote to colonels. The guy's a major *******.
1/20/2010 10:41 PM
◂ Prev 1|2|3|4...10 Next ▸
Who was the most Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.