Posted by MikeT23 on 3/2/2011 12:18:00 PM (view original):
Posted by deathinahole on 3/2/2011 11:52:00 AM (view original):
You are implying that there's only that available. I'm implying that if that's your narrow focus, you are wrong in thinking there wouldn't be better available.
So, to reword so it answers your asinine question; no, because there's better relievers available.
No, I'm asking, amongst available players, where do you rank THIS CERTAIN TYPE OF PITCHER? I'm not asking you to justify your draft picks.
Ok, I get where we are having the disconnect. I think.
I wouldn't get 40-50 innings out of a 25/60. I'd get 100+, if he was valuable enough to do it.
I rarely use that type of pitcher in relief, because...see previous...someone is usually paying him to be a starter. I can get a quality 75/15 to do that for cheaper.