Posted by topdogggbm on 10/25/2018 5:46:00 AM (view original):
This is just a personal opinion. But I think players should complain if you make a promise and don't fulfill it correctly. Because to me, if you promise a player minutes, that should be a minimum. They are 5 minutes apart. So if you promise a player 20 minutes, giving him 21 is not an amazing bonus. It's only a minute. But if you promised him 25 and he's getting 22.9 or something, then you are way off of the general promise. That's basically a 20 minute promise with some extra playing time thrown in.
I feel like when you make a promise, it's a general idea that you're AT LEAST going to get X minutes. And likely more. When discussing real life, if a coach promises a player 20 minutes, he's not watching the clock, and pulling him when 20 minutes is up, just to put a better player in. He's trying to win a game. So promised minutes should be looked at differently as a whole, when it comes to a coaches perspective.
Don't get me wrong, i skimp when I promise minutes too. And I do it often. But I understand when they complain.
Let's say you promise him 25 minutes per game, but he only averages 14 minutes for 3 of those 5 games, while fouling out in those 3 games. Maybe he's not a great defender and that team runs a full court press.
And then that same player plays 40 minutes for the other 2 games, it's not possible to play anymore, unless it goes into OT to play. 122/5=24.4 MPG
Should the coach still be responsible even though the coach played him every minute that he was eligible?
I know it's not likely to occur, but not totally impossible for that scenario to happen either.
If that situation were to happen in real life, I'm not sure the player complains, whether the coach is responsible or not.
Not in anyways, trying to be argumentative, but just sharing my opinion, respectfully.
10/25/2018 6:37 AM (edited)