The Mad Scientist Top 25 Ranking Debate Topic

colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 12/22/2009No you are wrong. You might be closer to a valid number then before but still nowhere near a correct value. I asked if it makes it better, you finally admitted that it does...I'm right...case closed. You really have comprehension issues...you have no idea what I've even said. As I pointed out numerous times some ratings are used on both sides of the court, some only one. This is irrelevant for ranking purposes, something you even refuse to consider or grasp. Some actually not at all for given positions. Yet you continue to ignore my points and keep saying this same thing, which is wrong. In rankings, the hows and whys don't matter...YOU DON'T GET IT, YOU DON'T DO RANKINGS.... And yes your winning percentage is very very important. Nothing to do with it, we're talking about rankings here and you're trying to spin it into I suck at the game....really....nice strat..... It shows why you can't understand what we are saying
12/22/2009 10:08 AM
colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
12/22/2009 10:09 AM
colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
Won't own up or address a single relevant thing that I bring up...unreal...

I don't care if everyone here thinks I'm an *******, if you look at this thread objectively, you'd see that I've argued everything away, and you jumped, skirted, and dodged questions and main points when challenged. Like I said, you can hate me all you like, just realize, I'm winning here....
12/22/2009 10:09 AM
zhawks
Posts: 881 (0)
Hall of Famer
208 66 38
Pro
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009
Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 12/22/2009

Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009

Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 12/22/2009
Yeah cuz clearly Coach K and Roy Williams and Bill Self... Yeah nobody thinks of them when they make the ratings, yah no way. How ignorant can I be? Duke and UNC don't get added bias from pollster. Duh how stupid of me! This isn't real life, boob. Prove to me that coach quality is included in the top 25, and I'll move along. You're failing to at least acknowledge that I said IF YOU CAN'T CONCRETELY MEASURE IT, IT DOESN'T MATTER FROM A RANKING STANDPOINT...talk about pounding your head against the wall talking to idiots....
ok mr 39%
You know you're done when that's all you've got ...you're not even arguing the concept any more...get lost, you're finished....your irrelevant posts say so
Actually it is my thread, but nice try telling me to leave.

This is the only thing concrete I have to measure you by, since all else doesn't matter.
12/22/2009 10:10 AM
zhawks
Posts: 881 (0)
Hall of Famer
208 66 38
Pro
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009Won't own up or address a single relevant thing that I bring up...unreal..
Actually it is the other way around. But irritating you beyond belief has actually made my day, so thanks.
12/22/2009 10:11 AM
colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 12/22/2009
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009
Won't own up or address a single relevant thing that I bring up...unreal...
Actually it is the other way around. But irritating you beyond belief has actually made my day, so thanks
I have answered ALL OF YOUR QUESTIONS, even went back and addressed things you claimed I skirted. Just because you don't like or can't accept my answers and or thought process, doesn't mean that I didn't give you exactly what you wanted...can't say the same for you...you've skirted at least 50% of what I said...great debater no doubt.
12/22/2009 10:13 AM
furry_nipps
Posts: 661 (0)
Hall of Famer
66
Prospect
wow...
12/22/2009 10:15 AM
zhawks
Posts: 881 (0)
Hall of Famer
208 66 38
Pro
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009
Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 12/22/2009

Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009
Won't own up or address a single relevant thing that I bring up...unreal...
Actually it is the other way around. But irritating you beyond belief has actually made my day, so thanks.
I have answered ALL OF YOUR QUESTIONS, even went back and addressed things you claimed I skirted. Just because you don't like or can't accept my answers and or thought process, doesn't mean that I didn't give you exactly what you wanted...can't say the same for you...you've skirted at least 50% of what I said...great debater no doubt
Ok mr. 39%, I take your thoughts at 39% value since, as you have clrealy demonstrated to me, that numbers are the only thing concrete and I must use those to rank you.
12/22/2009 10:15 AM
colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
You said a 780 could win 0 games and a 690 could lose 0 games...UTTERLY AND LAUGHABLY IMPOSSIBLE.

You first denied and later admitted that an overall rating would be more sound/credible if you eliminated WE-ST-DU, which has been my contention today....nice job.

And please know, just because you, the Almighty, disagrees with me or my logic, doesn't automatically mean that I'm wrong....it just means you're closed-minded and that you don't care about or listen to any opinions that aren't your own.

Just like dalter, I'm sure your gf or bf is Stoked about that about you.
12/22/2009 10:15 AM
zhawks
Posts: 881 (0)
Hall of Famer
208 66 38
Pro
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009
You said a 780 could win 0 games and a 690 could lose 0 games...UTTERLY AND LAUGHABLY IMPOSSIBLE.

You first denied and later admitted that an overall rating would be more sound/credible if you eliminated WE-ST-DU, which has been my contention today....nice job.

And please know, just because you, the Almighty, disagrees with me or my logic, doesn't automatically mean that I'm wrong....it just means you're closed-minded and that you don't care about or listen to any opinions that aren't your own.

Just like dalter, I'm sure your gf or bf is Stoked about that about you.

1st, yes it actually is possible and that is one of the cool things about WIS (as much as some of us might also hate it). Having never played d1 I don't know how you think you can say that.
12/22/2009 10:16 AM
aporter
Posts: 12 (0)
Hall of Famer
319
Prospect
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
12/22/2009 10:17 AM
colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 12/22/2009
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009

Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 12/22/2009

Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009
Won't own up or address a single relevant thing that I bring up...unreal...
Actually it is the other way around. But irritating you beyond belief has actually made my day, so thanks.
I have answered ALL OF YOUR QUESTIONS, even went back and addressed things you claimed I skirted. Just because you don't like or can't accept my answers and or thought process, doesn't mean that I didn't give you exactly what you wanted...can't say the same for you...you've skirted at least 50% of what I said...great debater no doubt.
Ok mr. 39%, I take your thoughts at 39% value since, as you have clrealy demonstrated to me, that numbers are the only thing concrete and I must use those to rank you
You're looking progressively more ridiculous from a debate standpoint...how about going back to my other posts and addressing something other than the fact that I said "time and time again"...really? ROFL!@
12/22/2009 10:17 AM
zhawks
Posts: 881 (0)
Hall of Famer
208 66 38
Pro
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009
You said a 780 could win 0 games and a 690 could lose 0 games...UTTERLY AND LAUGHABLY IMPOSSIBLE.

You first denied and later admitted that an overall rating would be more sound/credible if you eliminated WE-ST-DU, which has been my contention today....nice job.

And please know, just because you, the Almighty, disagrees with me or my logic, doesn't automatically mean that I'm wrong....it just means you're closed-minded and that you don't care about or listen to any opinions that aren't your own.

Just like dalter, I'm sure your gf or bf is Stoked about that about you.

We do disagree with your logic, because it is faulty as we have pointed out its flaws. Just like those did in the other thread of your college football ranking system. The difference is there you listened to them, here you won't listen to us.
12/22/2009 10:17 AM
colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 12/22/2009
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 12/22/2009

You said a 780 could win 0 games and a 690 could lose 0 games...UTTERLY AND LAUGHABLY IMPOSSIBLE.

You first denied and later admitted that an overall rating would be more sound/credible if you eliminated WE-ST-DU, which has been my contention today....nice job.

And please know, just because you, the Almighty, disagrees with me or my logic, doesn't automatically mean that I'm wrong....it just means you're closed-minded and that you don't care about or listen to any opinions that aren't your own.

Just like dalter, I'm sure your gf or bf is Stoked about that about you.

1st, yes it actually is possible and that is one of the cool things about WIS (as much as some of us might also hate it). Having never played d1 I don't know how you think you can say that
Would never happened, has never happened...the burden of proof is on you...you want to make bizarre claims that would never be true, I'm going to call you on your ****...PROVE IT
12/22/2009 10:18 AM
colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
12/22/2009 10:19 AM
◂ Prev 1...26|27|28|29|30...75 Next ▸
The Mad Scientist Top 25 Ranking Debate Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.