Quote: Originally Posted By sanderbear on 9/29/2009

snake, if you budget $20M for college, you aren't going to see all the available college players. [okay...]

If you had one draft with $20M for college, and another draft with $20M for college and $20M for JC, you'd see more players. (This assumes you'd allocate $0M for HS in either case). [okay...$40M shows you more than $20M]

If you had a system that allowed you to allocate based on age, and you put $20M into 20-yos and $20M into 19-yos, you'd also see a broader spectrum of players than the current $20M into college. [define "broader spectrum" ... and what's the point? You just want to see more players? You already see far, far more than you can draft.]

Am I wrong?

Who knows? You and mike still haven't shown that anything is broken. It doesn't even look like you're trying to.

I'm not saying the system is "broken." I was throwing out an idea to allow owners to better tailor their drafts.

It falls under what you think is "improvement". HBD isn't just about fixing what's broken, it's also about making the game better.

Whether or not any of the suggestions make the game "better" can be argued. It can also be argued that the "improvement" isn't substantial enough to worry with.