Who are the Top 4 College Teams in 2010 Topic

Quote: Originally Posted By isack24 on 1/16/2010
Quote: Originally Posted By vandydave on 1/16/2010

wisconsin owned duke? really, a 4 point loss at an opponent's gym who is a top 25 type team and very strong at home every season is being owned?

duke beat gonzaga by 35 on a neutral court



Did you actually watch the game?

The Badgers owned that game. Duke hit a barrage (and really it was just Dawkins) of threes in the final couple minutes. Wisconsin dominated the game until the final five minutes, and still ended up winning. As far as UW dominates, that was a domination.

i am a duke grad, i watched the game. the final score was a 4 point game with duke having a chance at the end, if thats domination then i fear for wisconsin's potential.
1/16/2010 5:40 PM
whether Villanova makes the final four depends on Yarou's development
1/16/2010 5:46 PM
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
1/16/2010 5:52 PM
Ive seen Gonzaga a ton this year and haven't been impressed. They are overated IMO and have no chance of going past the Sweet 16... definitely are not better then Duke. That isn't even debatable and if you think it is then you are an idiot.
1/16/2010 6:13 PM
someone is drinking the gonzaga kool-aid, in comparison with their most talented teams of the past decade so far this year's team has a long long way to go
1/16/2010 6:17 PM
Quote: Originally posted by tmacfan12 on 1/16/2010Ive seen Gonzaga a ton this year and haven't been impressed. They are overated IMO and have no chance of going past the Sweet 16... definitely are not better then Duke. That isn't even debatable and if you think it is then you are an idiot.

I never said Gonzaga is better than Duke. I said Gonzaga is a legit threat to win games in the tournament. Duke might be more talented, but when aren't they? I like Duke's squad this year and think they could do some damage, but they need to live up to expectations, something they haven't done in the past two seasons.

After Kentucky, Texas and Kansas, I think things are wide open after that.

It'll be a fun one through conference play and into the tournament, that's for sure.
1/16/2010 6:29 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By vandydave on 1/16/2010

Quote: Originally Posted By isack24 on 1/16/2010

Quote: Originally Posted By vandydave on 1/16/2010

wisconsin owned duke? really, a 4 point loss at an opponent's gym who is a top 25 type team and very strong at home every season is being owned?

duke beat gonzaga by 35 on a neutral court



Did you actually watch the game?

The Badgers owned that game. Duke hit a barrage (and really it was just Dawkins) of threes in the final couple minutes. Wisconsin dominated the game until the final five minutes, and still ended up winning. As far as UW dominates, that was a domination.

i am a duke grad, i watched the game. the final score was a 4 point game with duke having a chance at the end, if thats domination then i fear for wisconsin's potential.
You shouldn't. They aren't really that good, especially now that Leuer is hurt. Their potential is pretty minimal.

Although you're in massive denial if you think Wisconsin didn't absolutely control that game.
1/16/2010 11:26 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By gators55 on 1/16/2010. Duke might be more talented, but when aren't they? I like Duke's squad this year and think they could do some damage, but they need to live up to expectations, something they haven't done in the past two seasons.

It's more than just 2 seasons. I believe, in 14 of the past 15 years, Duke has been eliminated by an inferiorly seeded opponent
1/17/2010 12:14 AM
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
1/17/2010 2:55 AM
Long time Gonzaga fan here. Heck, I remember back to John Stockton playing there and being last cut for the olympic team. Going into this year no one knew much about this team having lost 4 guys who are now playing professionally (1 in NBA). Oh, and those 4 were some of the most highest regarded recruits ever to come to Spokane. Historically recruits have needed time to develop or were "sleepers".

Last years team had quality and would have been considered a disappointment with less than a sweet 16. They dutifully got there and I enjoyed watching them but, and it pains me to write this, they seemed "soft". Played more afraid of losing or getting injured than getting floor burns.

The current team hearkens back to those "surprise" teams. They play defence, rebound, and after practice scrimmages need band-aids and ice-packs. In games this year I've seen them commit hard "send a message" fouls that cross over into technicals. Um, maybe scrappy is a better term. The youngins have been a surprise that remind me of the sleepers of old. Coach Few likes to play early season with a short bench and rotate the new guys in with "audition" minutes. He believes some players play better/worse when the lights and camera's are on. These frosh have earned they're minutes and are now getting them. An exception is Harris. 20 yr old freshman who plays 1st team German National team is obviously the best freshman Gonzaga has ever had. No, he won't be college player of the year like Adam Morrison or go on to be an all time NBA great as good as John Stockton, but he will be somewhere between Detlef Schrempf and dirk Nowitski at the next level.

To sum up Gonzaga this year.... Preseason it was expected/feared that they would finish 2nd in the WCC, maybe 3rd, and would have to win the conference tourney (or rely on reputation) to get in the tourney. Instead, out of conference play has shown they are a tourney (top64) team. Conference play opened with the 2 toughest road games possible and has shown they are #1 in their conference. They WILL be in the tourney and SHOULD win a game or two. No way they beat a Kansas. Or Duke. Or etc. They are young and while surprisingly good are still really young. But if they can get 1 lucky win in the tourney - and if as you always hear during march madness that senior leadership in the back court matters (that's where the 2 upperclassmen starting are)- then if the moon is right they could be a final 4 team. But more likely a round of 32/16 exit.

I now return you to your previously scheduled forum.

PS. Please excuse excited Gonzaga fans. It's like how you feel when you've lost $100. Only to find it later. You don't think your back even, it's more like now your ahead $100!
1/17/2010 3:00 AM
Duke is completely overrated year after year. Great coach, but since the monster classes of the late ninties, Duke is constantly overhyped and overrated.
1/17/2010 5:44 AM
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
1/17/2010 7:12 AM
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
1/17/2010 7:20 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By vandydave on 1/17/2010more simply put, not enough dominating 6 foot 10 250lb big men have good SAT scores
And yet Georgetown seems to find plenty...
1/17/2010 10:14 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By isack24 on 1/17/2010
Quote: Originally Posted By vandydave on 1/17/2010
more simply put, not enough dominating 6 foot 10 250lb big men have good SAT scores.
And yet Georgetown seems to find plenty..
im not trying to start an academic ******* contest, but please, lets not compare georgetown's student-athletes on their basketball team to duke.
1/17/2010 12:25 PM
◂ Prev 1234 Next ▸
Who are the Top 4 College Teams in 2010 Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.