swamphawk's Justifications For His Racism Topic

swamphawk22
Posts: 13021 (0)
Hall of Famer
9 4 8 3 84 113 36
Prospect
So are you denying my definition? Can you produce one that says that using an off color joke in public is a racist act similar to lynching?
5/30/2011 3:03 AM
antonsirius
Posts: 2567 (0)
Hall of Famer
167 135 9 20
Prospect
Yes, I am denying any definition of any word for which you don't provide an outside source. You didn't provide a link, and you have consistently proven, both during this specific conversation and during your entire time on these boards, that your command of the English language is as ****** as anyone I've ever seen.

You, moreso than anybody else on WIS, are required to back up any attempt your make to define a word.


5/30/2011 9:05 AM
antonsirius
Posts: 2567 (0)
Hall of Famer
167 135 9 20
Prospect
Still waiting for that link... or did you just make up your supposed definition of racist?
5/31/2011 8:22 AM
antonsirius
Posts: 2567 (0)
Hall of Famer
167 135 9 20
Prospect
I'll assume you just made it up then, liar.
6/1/2011 3:08 AM
antonsirius
Posts: 2567 (0)
Hall of Famer
167 135 9 20
Prospect
A website for the swamps of this world:

http://www.notracistbut.com/
6/2/2011 12:30 PM
antonsirius
Posts: 2567 (0)
Hall of Famer
167 135 9 20
Prospect
FCC guidelines require that equal screen time be given to opposing attack threads, so as long as swamp keeps bumping the thread about how I'm human garbage, I'll keep bumping this one about how he justifies his racism.
6/4/2011 11:43 PM (edited)
genghisxcon
Posts: 5894 (0)
Hall of Famer
177 11
Prospect
In the known history of the English language, no sentence beginning with the words, "I'm not racist, but'" has failed to prove otherwise.
6/4/2011 5:41 PM
swamphawk22
Posts: 13021 (0)
Hall of Famer
9 4 8 3 84 113 36
Prospect
The interesting part is you dont mention what got me declared a racist.

So for everyone wondering here it is....

A Republican somewhere made an off color joke that could be considered racial. I pointed out that it was a pretty mild joke and the person has no history of Racism so maybe declaring them a racist isnt fair.

This got me branded a Racist by Anton.

I know it sounds crazy. And the funny part is he did this...and he acutally wants people to know about it!!
6/5/2011 3:35 AM
antonsirius
Posts: 2567 (0)
Hall of Famer
167 135 9 20
Prospect
More lies. As usual.
6/5/2011 8:45 AM
swamphawk22
Posts: 13021 (0)
Hall of Famer
9 4 8 3 84 113 36
Prospect
So what about my review of the issue is a lie? 

The whole thing is written down Anton so be careful...

Name that Lie!
6/5/2011 2:44 PM
antonsirius
Posts: 2567 (0)
Hall of Famer
167 135 9 20
Prospect
Three lies:

1) Bolling's "chugging 40s" comment was not merely a mild, off-color joke. it was a disgusting and calculated pander to racists designed to increase his profile among a segment of Fox's audience and advance his career. i'd normally pass this off as a difference of opinion, but since lying is as natural to you as breathing I no longer give you the benefit of the doubt about it.

2) I never declared Bolling a racist, and I defy you to find one post in which I did so. I said his comment was racist. It's the same distinction between me identifying something someone posts as a lie, and me identifying you as a liar.

3) I detailed all the excuses for the racism in Bolling's tweet that you employed, and which caused me to brand you as the functional equivalent of a racist. They extend well beyond what you suggested above. It wasn't one thing that caused me to attach that label to you, it was the sum total of them, which showed a clear pattern of internatizing the arguments commonly employed by racists to defend and deflect attention from their racism.

You're damn right I want people to see what sort of depths you're willing to stoop to in defense of the people you decide are on your team. Your partisanship is far more important to you than your supposed anti-racist position, which is why it's so hollow and unbelievable.
6/5/2011 3:54 PM
swamphawk22
Posts: 13021 (0)
Hall of Famer
9 4 8 3 84 113 36
Prospect

Where can you back up your statement that Bollings comment was a pre-meditated plan to appeal to rcaists?
Also where can you get that there is enough of a segment of FOXs audience that is racist?

This is your first big flaw. This was clearly an off the cuff remark. There are not enough racists anywhere to make it worthwhile to pander to them.

So if I change it to declaring his action racist does that get me off. It does not change the meaning of my response.

This is the second flaw. A common flaw for you. Instead of dealing with an issue you try to find some tiny technical issue. All you needed to say was "I didnt call him a racist, but I did say he committed a racist act and I will respond to that". You cant do that. The technical issue is your only response.

If you accuse a racist of Racism they may say "I am not a racist" (often they will admit their racism and be proud of it). On the flip side if you falsely accuse a non-racist of racism they can also day "I am not a racist".

Third flaw. You go with a stand up comedy answer to a response to racism. How you respond to a charge of racism does not make you a racist. Racism makes you a racist and I have never committed a racist act.

You are a gifted poster. You spin your webs well. It is very tricky to get out of your accusations.

I stand by everything I have ever said.

And I use my life as proof I am not a Racist.

6/5/2011 7:06 PM
antonsirius
Posts: 2567 (0)
Hall of Famer
167 135 9 20
Prospect
Understanding the ******* English language is not a "tiny technical issue', liar.

Here's how one of our typical disagreements go, of which this seems to be one:

1) I post something about an issue, i.e. "Bolling's "chugging 40s tweet was racist."

2) You misconstrue it -- "You called Bolling racist! And you want him fired!"

3) I explain that you are misconstruing what I said -- "I did not call him racist, i called his comment racist. And I never called for him to be fired. Find one post where I said either."

4) You ignore my clarification and either
     A) Continue on as though your misinterpretation had never been corrected, thus blatantly lying (as you just did -- "anton called Bolling a racist!"; or
     B) Move the goalposts (as you did after I busted you on your initial lie -- "You said he pandered to racists!"

This isn't the first time you've run through this pattern, and probably won't be the last.

You're a serial, pathological liar, swamp. Your words are worth less than ****. And your claim that your "life" -- the life of a pathological liar -- is proof you are not a racist is just as worthless.
 
Basically, you are the living embodiment of the Two Cannibals riddle.
6/5/2011 9:26 PM
swamphawk22
Posts: 13021 (0)
Hall of Famer
9 4 8 3 84 113 36
Prospect
You just made all that up.
 
I never claimed you called for him to be fired. I did claim you called him a racist, you "Changed the Goalposts" and said that you just said he made a racist statement, even though you attach a horrible motive to it. So I said it didnt really matter and you can respond to my point with a simple change.

This is your standard tactic. You make a crazy statement, I call you, You claim that you never made it due to some technical point, I redirect my point, and you go on a long technical rant that most people cannot follow.

So lets get to the bottom of this.

You claimed his statement was racist. That he was doing it to get racists to like him more.

I claim that his statement had racial overtones, but since it was an off the cuff remark and he is a good guy otherwise we should let it drop.

Or do you need two or three pages to get to the bottom of it?
6/5/2011 10:38 PM
antonsirius
Posts: 2567 (0)
Hall of Famer
167 135 9 20
Prospect
Quote post by swamphawk22 on 6/5/2011 10:38:00 PM:
I never claimed you called for him to be fired.

You sad, sad man. You are stone busted - again.


Quote post by swamphawk22 on 5/30/2011 12:58:00 AM:
This boils down to Anton is furious that someone made fun of his guy and that we are not all calling for his fireing.

You're a liar, swamp. A pathetic, pathological liar.

6/5/2011 10:51 PM
◂ Prev 1|2|3|4|5...10 Next ▸
swamphawk's Justifications For His Racism Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.