The Next Update for HBD Topic

shobob
Posts: 3387 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 363
Prospect
The default view for a screen should be for the time of season that you are in, be it spring training, regular season or playoffs (if you're in)
9/12/2011 4:33 PM
shobob
Posts: 3387 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 363
Prospect
Fire your CS staff.  The ones who told me that you guys are actually paying attention to the suggestions forum when you actually weren't.  Just kidding.
9/12/2011 4:37 PM
crickett13
Posts: 2396 (0)
Hall of Famer
398 74 25 145
Prospect
1) 10 votes for the HOF
2) In the draft settings replace any with any position player and any pitcher.
3) Let us see projected ratings in the player search.
9/12/2011 4:49 PM (edited)
deathinahole
Posts: 4139 (0)
Hall of Famer
76 2 1 42 1 75
Prospect
Posted by kcden on 9/12/2011 1:37:00 PM (view original):
-     Add the ability to to have individual baserunning settings for players (try to avoid EVER sending my baserunner with 0 speed/5 baserunning, while allowing my 90/80 guy to go nearly every time he's on base)
Killed in the suggestion forum
9/12/2011 4:45 PM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Show
RoyalOkie
Posts: 506 (0)
Hall of Famer
133 76
Prospect
1) Ability to tag owners as "DumbArse" in the forums.
2) Just so no one says "It wasn't ever mentioned" look at some form of dynamic budgeting based on previous year win pct. There has to be some penalty (however minor) for tanking.
3) remove the "DumbArse" tag from my profile which will undoubtedly be applied because I ventured to mention point 2.
9/12/2011 5:03 PM (edited)
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect
The penalty for tanking is removal from the world. 

And, death, you could probably find 20 links for the SB discussion.   As I said, it comes up every couple of months.
9/12/2011 5:04 PM
boogerlips
Posts: 3731 (0)
Hall of Famer
205 45
Hall of Famer
Posted by deathinahole on 9/12/2011 3:30:00 PM (view original):
With due respect, I refuse to populate that  which has already been done in the Suggestion forum

Ideas there have been created, debated, shot down, tweaked...this thread just becomes a shove it in and jump that queue.
This.
Thread Closed
9/12/2011 5:06 PM
deathinahole
Posts: 4139 (0)
Hall of Famer
76 2 1 42 1 75
Prospect
Posted by MikeT23 on 9/12/2011 5:04:00 PM (view original):
The penalty for tanking is removal from the world. 

And, death, you could probably find 20 links for the SB discussion.   As I said, it comes up every couple of months.
Yes, but this one has you and pstrnutcase going at it, so I prefer it.
9/12/2011 5:11 PM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect

It's all good to take a stand but, if you let threads like this go unnoticed by the reasonable, the unreasonable will rule the day.    It's pretty well-established that WifS will oil the squeaky wheel(if they're oiling wheels at the time). 

9/12/2011 5:11 PM
willsauve
Posts: 2255 (0)
Hall of Famer
168 1 1 1 197
Prospect
Posted by deathinahole on 9/12/2011 4:58:00 PM (view original):
http://www.whatifsports.com/forums/Posts.aspx?TopicID=432450&TopicsTimeframe=365&TopicsPage=7

Link to SB discussion
After reading through the attached link.  I agree that there doesnt need to be a SB setting for individual players. It just gives teams another way to lose on purpose.  I also noticed that a certain someone was fricking nuts 9 months ago..
9/12/2011 5:17 PM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Show
shobob
Posts: 3387 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 363
Prospect
derailed
9/12/2011 5:40 PM
lvnwrth
Posts: 504 (0)
Hall of Famer
100 37
Prospect

Why can't teams hire coaches to multi-year contracts?  They do it in MLB.

9/12/2011 5:51 PM
dedelman
Posts: 2234 (0)
Hall of Famer
318 215
Pro
Re-do the development engine to provide more variation.  This should include different patterns of development across ages, and vastly different degrees of development, so that you can't tell easily from looking at a half-season of development how a player will develop.  Include some potential for failed and explosive development in each player; ideally, make the degree of risk that a player will not develop (and the reward that a player will super-develop) some sort of rating that you view more accurately the more you spend on scouting.
9/12/2011 6:49 PM
◂ Prev 1|2|3|4|5...19 Next ▸
The Next Update for HBD Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.