Posted by npb7768 on 1/18/2016 6:50:00 PM (view original):
Posted by the0nlyis on 1/18/2016 6:44:00 PM (view original):
your on a wild goose chase if you think I should have to post the people I sitemail talking about HD or specific help.
It's super easy to tell if new users are good just look at the recruits they are going after, the good new coaches will have good recruits. Therefore assume they have an idea they are doing.
Thank you for your answers.
I now know that i have to guard against yet another hidden layer of difficulty in HD.
As long as i know the disadvantages and hurdles i think i have a chance to maybe overcome them.
i definitely do not think coaches have to disclose who else they are mentoring. its up to the coaches involved if they want to do it.
here's the thing - usually, you can get a pretty good gauge of what is going on by the resume of the coach. i guess if the mentoring JUST started, it could make a difference, but the results aren't usually THAT instantaneous. most of the mentoring i've done over the years, was not like, a hands-on entire recruiting session, thats pretty intense. a couple points here and there, its going to help, but its not going to put you at a major disadvantage to that person overnight.
i do think multiple IDs should be transparent, which is why i was always super-open about my IDs. not everyone chooses to do that, and that's ok i guess, but i would feel better making it public. i also think co-coaching is probably better to disclose or not, if for no other reason than social courtesy (its like send a text on someone else's phone, good to say its you, not just send a message, IMO). i do think there is also the point of, its fair for people to know who they are playing, but i think drawing that line at mentoring is somewhat ridiculous, considering mentoring might be no more than a sitemail every 3 months.