It's medicine in my state. Do you stop driving just because you are on meds??
I have stents. Have to take blood thinners of some sort (Doc prefers the pills to my idea----Vodka!) daily. I still drive whenever I want.
Same thing with Marijuana man. I ain't giving up driving just because of me medicine....................

Of course, I don't remember when I last........ where was I?

Posted by wylie715 on 8/12/2020 5:49:00 PM (view original):
it may be illegal but that doesn't stop a shitload of people from doing it

Would you apply this same logic to alcohol?

I drive WAY better stoned because I’m paranoid. Speed limit, 10 and 2, pay better attention, all the way around. Nothin like a cool buzz and a long drive.

Posted by tangplay on 8/12/2020 6:03:00 PM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 8/12/2020 5:49:00 PM (view original):
it may be illegal but that doesn't stop a shitload of people from doing it

Would you apply this same logic to alcohol?

without a doubt.Having driven under the influence of both in the past (not in many years though) I think alchohol is worse.

So you, wylie715, would ban alcohol and marijuana.

I need this on record, for when you run for President.

where did I say I would ban alcohol or marijuana?? All I said is many people drive under the influence of both even if it is illegal.
and I guarantee you, I would never, ever run for president. Who the hell would want that job?

Obviously. The context of me bringing this up is over marijuana legalization. All3's argument seems to be that because people drive under the influence of marijuana, it should be illegal. I simply want to know if he would take this same stance with alcohol.

well, don't compare me to all3...just because he thinks that does not mean I think that. More than likely if he thinks something, the odds are pretty good that I think the opposite.

Posted by wylie715 on 8/12/2020 6:32:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 8/12/2020 6:03:00 PM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 8/12/2020 5:49:00 PM (view original):
it may be illegal but that doesn't stop a shitload of people from doing it

Would you apply this same logic to alcohol?

without a doubt.Having driven under the influence of both in the past (not in many years though) I think alchohol is worse.

tang twisting what I said yet AGAIN, or just trying to put words in my mouth? I see he's trying to do it to you too now. What a freakin' loser idiot. Is it really that hard to argue opinions without totally twisting what the other person says or simply flat-out lying? Can't begin to understand why he feels the need to do so, and don't care, although I do wish he'd quit doing it about me. Hopefully since everyone here knows they shouldn't believe a word he posts they don't believe anything he posts about me. I'm a big boy and can speak for myself, and rarely shy away from sharing my true opinions. Either way, I agree with wylie 100% on the above.
Yes, bob, I do believe you should stop driving when you're on meds that effect your judgement and reactions. Any med (drug), legal or not. Because of the cancer, I've had synthetic marijuana in my fridge for months, but haven't touched it because I drive every day. I'm not taking the chance I kill someone, and neither should you or anyone else.

You're intentionally being a dumbass.

All3 said this in response to a pro-marijuana post:

Yeah, just what this Country needs to add, a bunch of people driving around high. That sure would help things. You moronic buffoon.

So I responded:

... it's still illegal to drive while high. Legalizing marijuana doesn't change that.

Wylie then jumped in to defend... something? That people still drive while high? Honestly, I'm not sure what wylie was saying. Anyway, I think it's fair to assume from my perspective that all3 opposes legalizing marijuana and wylie would have agreed (although wylie has now clarified that he doesn't, so we were talking past each other).

So I'm not really sure what all3 thinks I 'twisted'. The only assumption I made about him was that he opposes legalizing marijuana, which would seem to be a logical assumption from the post where he specifically argues against it.