Diagnostics for Leadoff Hitters II Topic

MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect
You don't score runs when you strikeout. You walk your no hittin' *** back to the dugout and hope the next player picks you up.
2/22/2008 12:39 PM
a3morey
Posts: 58 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 5 2 163
Prospect
wasnt arguing that either, learn how to read and get back to me.
2/22/2008 12:39 PM
toddcommish
Posts: 5101 (0)
Hall of Famer
520 10 1 14 16 90
Prospect
OK, let's try summing up again....
Bosux/nuke/hart:
  • Striking out has no impact on run scoring
  • The number of times a runner advances on a non-K out is negated by the number of times there is GIDP, therefore making an out by strikeout is NOT WORSE than making any other kind of out.
Is that correct?
2/22/2008 12:41 PM
_nuke_
Posts: 2 (0)
Veteran
1 17 9
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By a3morey on 2/22/2008
the opposite of a k is not another out in the field.
the opposite of a k is a ball in play that has the potential for a hit.
therefore you cant just say that k would turn into another out and lets look at the run differential.
Looks to me like you are saying that a ball in play is better because it has the chance to become a hit.

We are assuming it is another out.

Tard.

2/22/2008 12:42 PM
a3morey
Posts: 58 (0)
Hall of Famer
1 5 2 163
Prospect
I WASNT ARGUING THAT EITHER ONE WAS BETTER THAN THE OTHER!
IM SAYING YOU ARE WRONG IN ASSUMING IT IS ANOTHER OUT BECAUSE IT ISNT! Simply stating that the point of view you are taking to shape your argument is wrong because it doesnt work that way. comparing apples and oranges.
2/22/2008 12:46 PM
_nuke_
Posts: 2 (0)
Veteran
1 17 9
Prospect
We are assuming for the sake of argument.
Both sides are.
2/22/2008 12:48 PM
hartjh14
Posts: 468 (0)
Hall of Famer
165 8 1 147
Prospect
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
2/22/2008 12:48 PM
_nuke_
Posts: 2 (0)
Veteran
1 17 9
Prospect
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
2/22/2008 12:50 PM
hartjh14
Posts: 468 (0)
Hall of Famer
165 8 1 147
Prospect
Quote: Originally Posted By MikeT23 on 2/22/2008
I have no doubt that bosux hasn't made a point in 4 days.
I have no doubt that harthj's points are as relevant as his "HBD strategy" that produces a .386 winning percentage.
Look at current results mikey. My strategy is working better than I thought actually - or at least earlier. You may want to slow down on pointing to my plan as a failure as it is doing extremely well.
2/22/2008 12:51 PM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
2/22/2008 12:58 PM
_nuke_
Posts: 2 (0)
Veteran
1 17 9
Prospect
hartjh's HBD record is really irrelevant.
But don't let that stop you from ignoring that fact that you are wrong about strikouts.
2/22/2008 1:03 PM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect
harthj is irrelevant to this discussion.
I wish I was wrong so I could ignore this thread.
2/22/2008 1:09 PM
bosoxbill
Posts: 2 (0)
Hall of Famer
85 12 21
Prospect
You don't score runs when you GIDP. You walk your worse-than-struckout *** back to the dugout and hope your pitcher can put up a zero and pick you up. Because there's a pretty good chance your useless *** ended the inning.
2/22/2008 1:11 PM
hartjh14
Posts: 468 (0)
Hall of Famer
165 8 1 147
Prospect
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
2/22/2008 1:12 PM
MikeT23
Posts: 58012 (0)
Hall of Famer
87 1 47 1 189
Prospect
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
2/22/2008 1:13 PM
◂ Prev 1...30|31|32|33|34...48 Next ▸
Diagnostics for Leadoff Hitters II Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.