TRUMP: Best President Ever (New and Improved!) Topic

Posted by tangplay on 7/16/2018 6:51:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 6:46:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tangplay on 7/16/2018 6:44:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:25:00 PM (view original):
Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 3:22:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:21:00 PM (view original):
Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 3:19:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 3:17:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 3:07:00 PM (view original):
Former FBI Assistant Director James Kallstrom on Peter Strzok - “He’s a liar. I mean he is a good liar,” Kallstrom said of Strzok during an interview on “The Evening Edit” on Thursday. “He’s a smart guy so he can lie with great proficiency.”


And fool bad luck apparently. Ha ha ha ha.
Well, clearly, Strzok’s actions prove you right. It was crazy how, right before the election, he leaked info to the press that the Trump campaign was under investigation. Wait, nope, didn’t do that.

But it was crazy how he argued that the FBI shouldn’t announce the update on the Clinton investigation in order to help Clinton. Oh wait, nope, he was in favor of the announcement.

Well, at least he’s guilty of trying to make sure no charges were filled against Clinton. Dammit! Turns out he was in favor of charging her. Jeez, this guy sucks at his deep state secret Trump sabatoge job.




Seriously, though. FBI agents are allowed to have opinions on politics. They just can’t let those opinions impact their work. And, judging by the evidence, Strzok didn’t allow that to happen.
Exactly. Who did PS damage greater?

Hillary or DJT?
Himself and the Bureau
None of that came out until later.


Proof is in the pudding.


the FBI damaged HRC. Not DJT

In one exchange Page sent a text to Strzok saying, "(Trump's) not ever going to become president, right? Right?!" Strzok replied, "No. No he's not. We'll stop it."

LOL - But he was not biased.





And particularly damaging was the fact that, according to unnamed US officials, Strzok played a role in changing former FBI Director James Comey's wording regarding how she handled classified information from "gross negligence" to the noncriminal "extremely careless."


Talk about refusing to answer questions. Yes. He was biased. Everyone is. He didn't let that impact his work.
OK, tangy. Go back to your safe space.
I got no safe space. I don't live in ******* California like BL. I live in Kansas. CON COUNTRY!

You and BL can keep going at it from your richy big cities.

I will stay back here with my working class country people.

I am the outsider.
Man, this is an awesome post...and I thought I was the only one watching from the sidelines.
7/16/2018 7:22 PM
So you think Putin lied today when he said he wanted Trump to win?
7/16/2018 7:22 PM
Posted by strikeout26 on 7/16/2018 7:07:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 12:25:00 PM (view original):
Your opinion is irrelevant just as mine was when I didn't have kids. I realized that quickly after I had them. Of course in the end they will date whomever they want but generally girls gravitate toward dating people who closest resemble how their dads acted and such. Look it up.

Boys are more of rebels. I was too. I know.
My daughter may date when I'm dead and gone, not a second before.
Because you’re raising someone who you don’t trust to make a decision???
7/16/2018 7:23 PM
7/16/2018 7:28 PM
Posted by tangplay on 7/16/2018 7:22:00 PM (view original):
We are all ignoring you, Doug. Your intellect is just too great for us to comprehend. Now, please post 150000000 pages of Rush Limbaugh spouting conservative nutjob propaganda again. Thanks!


Together we will ignore Doug. For 24 years. Or until he posts again. Whoever comes first.
7/16/2018 7:32 PM


I said whoever comes first!
7/16/2018 7:33 PM


I could use a little help here.
7/16/2018 7:39 PM


TELL ME ABOUT IT!
7/16/2018 7:41 PM

A Russian gun-rights activist who developed close relations with leaders of the National Rifle Association as well as conservative activists working with Donald Trump’s presidential campaign was arraigned Monday on charges she conspired to influence American politics on behalf of the Russian government.

Maria Butina, 29, who founded the Russian gun group “The Right to Bear Arms” and worked as the executive assistant to a top official of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, was arrested Sunday by the FBI in Washington, D.C. The charges allege that she visited the United States in 2015 and 2016 for the purposes of acting “as an agent” of the Russia, according to a criminal complaint released by the U.S. Justice Department on Monday afternoon, a few hours after President Trump and Russian President Putin met in Helsinki. Butina conspired to “exploit personal connections” with U.S. political figures and to “infiltrate organizations active in U.S. politics” and establish “back channel lines of communication” in an effort to advance Russian government interests, the complaint charges.

Chief among the groups Butina and her boss, Russian central banker Alexander Torshin, sought to infiltrate was the NRA. Torshin became a lifetime member of the group, and he and Butina regularly attended the association’s annual meetings, held private dinners with the group’s leaders and joined them for target shooting.

A March 2015 email to an unnamed conservative activist that was discovered on a search of Butina’s laptop outlined a project to alter the Republican Party’s traditional hostility to Russia by exploiting ties to the NRA, which she described as “the largest sponsor of the elections to the U.S. Congress,” according to an FBI affidavit in support of her arrest. She also wrote that Republicans “would likely obtain control over the U.S. government after the 2016 elections.” (In the complaint, the Republicans are described only as “Political Party 1” and the NRA as a “Gun Rights Organization.” The NRA did not immediately respond to requests for comment.)

Butina’s arrest is significant in light of her apparent efforts to penetrate the Trump campaign and to get the GOP candidate to commit to lifting sanctions on Russia at a time relations with Moscow were hardly a front-burner issue in the presidential race. In July 2015, just weeks after Trump announced his candidacy, Butina showed up at a conservative evangelical Christian event in Las Vegas, where she questioned the new candidate about his position on sanctions against Russia. “Do you want to continue the politics of sanctions that are damaging both economies?” Butina asked Trump after he called on her in a question and answer session. Trump replied in the course of a rambling five-minute answer: “I know Putin. … I believe I would get along very nicely with Putin, OK? I don’t think you’d need the sanctions.”

As revealed in the book Russian Roulette, co-authored by this reporter with David Corn, Trump adviser Steven Bannon and Republican National Committee chair Reince Priebus shared concerns about Butina and her agenda after viewing video of her questioning Trump.

“How was it that this Russian woman happened to be in Las Vegas for that event?” Bannon and Priebus discussed among themselves, according to “Russian Roulette.” “And how was it that Trump happened to call on her? And Trump’s response? It was odd, Bannon thought, that Trump had a fully developed answer. Priebus agreed there was something strange about Butina. Whenever there were events held by conservative groups, she was always around, he told Bannon.”

7/16/2018 7:46 PM
7/16/2018 7:53 PM
Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 7:22:00 PM (view original):
So you think Putin lied today when he said he wanted Trump to win?
If you're talking to me, I did not see the meeting. I was at the baseball field. But, I don't think anyone would be surprised if Putin lied about something. I don't think Putin cared who won. He wanted to wreak havoc. A close race makes that much easier. The BHO/Hillary admin did not have a strong track record of being tough on Russia, so I don't think he feared her winning.
7/16/2018 8:02 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 7:23:00 PM (view original):
Posted by strikeout26 on 7/16/2018 7:07:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 12:25:00 PM (view original):
Your opinion is irrelevant just as mine was when I didn't have kids. I realized that quickly after I had them. Of course in the end they will date whomever they want but generally girls gravitate toward dating people who closest resemble how their dads acted and such. Look it up.

Boys are more of rebels. I was too. I know.
My daughter may date when I'm dead and gone, not a second before.
Because you’re raising someone who you don’t trust to make a decision???
Nah, I don't trust boys. I remember too much what I was like.
7/16/2018 8:03 PM
Posted by strikeout26 on 7/16/2018 8:03:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 7/16/2018 7:23:00 PM (view original):
Posted by strikeout26 on 7/16/2018 7:07:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cccp1014 on 7/16/2018 12:25:00 PM (view original):
Your opinion is irrelevant just as mine was when I didn't have kids. I realized that quickly after I had them. Of course in the end they will date whomever they want but generally girls gravitate toward dating people who closest resemble how their dads acted and such. Look it up.

Boys are more of rebels. I was too. I know.
My daughter may date when I'm dead and gone, not a second before.
Because you’re raising someone who you don’t trust to make a decision???
Nah, I don't trust boys. I remember too much what I was like.
I know your original point is just a joke and not to get too soapboxy but the whole “my daughters can’t date” thing is a huge pet peeve of mine.

Dating, breaking hearts, and getting your heart broken is a huge part of growing up. It’s necessary to have an adult relationship later in life. I experienced it, so did my wife, so will my son and daughter. Your daughter should too.
7/16/2018 8:14 PM
Posted by strikeout26 on 7/16/2018 8:02:00 PM (view original):
Posted by The Taint on 7/16/2018 7:22:00 PM (view original):
So you think Putin lied today when he said he wanted Trump to win?
If you're talking to me, I did not see the meeting. I was at the baseball field. But, I don't think anyone would be surprised if Putin lied about something. I don't think Putin cared who won. He wanted to wreak havoc. A close race makes that much easier. The BHO/Hillary admin did not have a strong track record of being tough on Russia, so I don't think he feared her winning.
BO's energy policy about bankrupted Russia. He was tougher on Russia than those on the right will lead you to believe. It's an argument I've made plenty on the boards so I don't want to get in a giant rehash but look deeper at what BO and the Saudi's did.
7/16/2018 8:14 PM
I really think you should explain it to us. In detail.

And then you can explain why the libs are all upset about Trump because we still don't know. We still don't know what he did.

Explain to us exactly what the hell he did. Thanks.
7/16/2018 8:27 PM (edited)
◂ Prev 1...389|390|391|392|393...960 Next ▸
TRUMP: Best President Ever (New and Improved!) Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.