Who was the most Topic

zhawks
Posts: 881 (0)
Hall of Famer
208 66 38
Pro
Quote: Originally Posted By dcfonzie on 1/22/2010colonels - elaborations aren't really necessary. You're a douchebag. Let's leave it at that and move on.
1/22/2010 11:10 AM
wisefella99
Posts: 58 (0)
Hall of Famer
55 16
Prospect
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
1/22/2010 11:41 AM
metsmax
Posts: 1598 (0)
Hall of Famer
5 2 836 2
Pro
I am really disappointed that Context Adjusted Annoyance Factor has not taken off
1/22/2010 11:52 AM
zhawks
Posts: 881 (0)
Hall of Famer
208 66 38
Pro
Quote: Originally Posted By metsmax on 1/22/2010I am really disappointed that Context Adjusted Annoyance Factor has not taken of
I can't find that on wikipedia. My first google hit happens to be your post in this thread... I believe I need more info, could you pull the data from the forums and provide us with rankings?
1/22/2010 12:27 PM
_hannibal_
Posts: 455 (0)
Veteran
23
Prospect
Quote: Originally posted by metsmax on 1/22/2010I am really disappointed that Context Adjusted Annoyance Factor has not taken off

The problem with the CAAF is that it depends too much on ARS of the other posters (Annoyance Resistance Strength) and not enough on the APAP (Adjusted Posters Annoyed Percentage). Also, due to the funky weighting system, you can game it by posting exclusively in "away" threads (i.e. threads you did not start).
1/22/2010 12:31 PM
zhawks
Posts: 881 (0)
Hall of Famer
208 66 38
Pro
Quote: Originally Posted By _hannibal_ on 1/22/2010

Quote: Originally posted by metsmax on 1/22/2010
I am really disappointed that Context Adjusted Annoyance Factor has not taken off

The problem with the CAAF is that it depends too much on ARS of the other posters (Annoyance Resistance Strength) and not enough on the APAP (Adjusted Posters Annoyed Percentage). Also, due to the funky weighting system, you can game it by posting exclusively in "away" threads (i.e. threads you did not start).
Your closed mindedness doesn't allow you to understand that all the engine takes into account are the ratings!
1/22/2010 1:02 PM
metsmax
Posts: 1598 (0)
Hall of Famer
5 2 836 2
Pro
"away" threads FTW!!
1/22/2010 1:05 PM
coach_billyg
Posts: 2072 (0)
Hall of Famer
92
Pro
Quote: Originally posted by tmacfan12 on 1/20/2010I would just like to state that I was 12 when I started on this site. I'm not surprised I was constantly ripped into in the forums. If a 12 year old came in here now it would be the same thing lol.

if a mature 12 year old came in here now it would be totally different. in fact, i bet there are some among us. i started playing games on the internet long ago when i was about that age, and never had anything close to the experience you had. there weren't really forums, but you could chat with people over a nice game of cards or chess or whatnot. like i said... nothing like your experience, in the slightest :)
1/22/2010 2:06 PM
coach_billyg
Posts: 2072 (0)
Hall of Famer
92
Pro
Quote: Originally posted by Weena on 1/21/2010a) tmacfan12 - He really was 12 so no vote here. There are others much older who still act like they are 12.

b) furry_nips - No vote here either. It was all an act. He knew exactly how to pull peoples chains. There are others here who act like he did only are not joking around.

d) swamphawk22 - Close but loses my vote because he limited himself to the -5 and politics. Others here still use the shotgun approach.

e) a_in_the_b - Not sure why he is on the list. He was merely trying to learn the game and backed off once he understood.

f) Other - I would have voted for jakarus but there is someone more deserving. VK was insensitive, rude, arrogant, and did use excessive profanity but he loses my vote because once you get past all that he was normally right on with his comment. It was his approach people didn't like not his meaning.

Well, that leaves only 1 and yes Colonels19 gets my vote. He is a terminator. You can slow him down but you can't stop him. He hijacks any thread he posts in that he didn't start and turns it into his own propaganda machine. He resorts to profanity when frustrated and double talks and talks around points he can't defend. He accuses others of doing the same thing he does and then comes back with some sarcastic comment when called on it. He is tmac at 12, furry without the chain. He is as prolific as swamp but with no limitation to topic. He is VK without a point and is almost jakarus reincarnated. He has earned his #1 spot.

lol, quite a compelling argument. i was going to vote for furry, but i think you've solid me.
1/22/2010 2:10 PM
furry_nipps
Posts: 661 (0)
Hall of Famer
66
Prospect
So I am losing?
1/22/2010 2:23 PM
colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
What you "boobs" all fail to realize is that the CAAF, ARS, and APAP all pale in comparison to the Colonels Intelligence Index (CII) where colonels seems to think he's smarter than he really is and the rest of you think he's dumber than he really is. Once this irons out, then you'll have a solid ranking.
1/22/2010 2:28 PM
coach_billyg
Posts: 2072 (0)
Hall of Famer
92
Pro
Quote: Originally posted by colonels19 on 1/22/2010What you "boobs" all fail to realize is that the CAAF, ARS, and APAP all pale in comparison to the Colonels Intelligence Index (CII) where colonels seems to think he's smarter than he really is and the rest of you think he's dumber than he really is.  Once this irons out, then you'll have a solid ranking.
were you being serious about that 50/50 thing? if so, you definitely have it wrong, and are much, much dumber than we give you credit for. at least, much dumber than i give you credit for. i suppose i put you at the limit of what i consider somewhat reasonable for human intelligence, but still comfortably ahead of a mule. if you were serious about that 50/50 thing, i would have to readjust my perception, to somewhere between a mule and a tree.
1/22/2010 2:37 PM
colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
You're one of the few that realizes that I'm pulling the strings here.
1/22/2010 2:39 PM
tkimble
Posts: 1347 (0)
Hall of Famer
2 335 1 1
Rookie
Quote: Originally posted by colonels19 on 1/22/2010You're one of the few that realizes that I'm pulling the strings here.

You might be pulling the strings but your team sucks...
1/22/2010 2:52 PM
colonels19
Posts: 4399 (0)
Hall of Famer
78 90 3 1 168 2 1 11
Prospect
Given the team talent...6-2 isn't bad, no? ;)
1/22/2010 2:54 PM
◂ Prev 1|2|3|4|5|6...10 Next ▸
Who was the most Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.