I lose to Taint 3-2 in the 12th. Ruth has a Homer, Robinson doesn't.

I would like to put in a request to play sparky with my team that lost to the Mariners.  It would only be fair to allow the only team (#3) to not play sparky a 2nd chance in one of their games as well since that is basically what fish got.  I still don't get how that was even an option to allow both of those teams a chance to get wins.

There is no crying in baseball.

Wow.  F off delta.  I wouldn't have even played if I knew it would come to this.

Yea to be honest, it doesnt even matter anymore. He lost anyways, so the standings arent even messed up.

Everyone had the ability to play once with each of his teams. I thought I'd come up with a good way to avoid slowing the game down, give everyone a chance to play, and be fair. I didn't think that opening up unplayed games to be gotten in against the computer would create problems. Obviously I was wrong. I'll re-examine how to make those things happen when I have more time. Several have complained that teams got extra chances to win, without mentioning that teams also got extra chances to lose. Right now, I really don't feel like putting in the time to figure out individual immunity, set up clues for a fourth immunity idol, set a deadline for voting and distribute bonuses to the winning tribe.

I won't have a chance to spend more time on the game until early Tuesday afternoon. If the Taint-staindman showdown has not taken place by then, I'll stay on until I find a player from each tribe (1 and 2) and have them play the game while I observe.

Based on my early morning, sleep-deprived calculations, Tribe 1 has a 23-32 advantage in the runs-allowed tiebreaker, and even with a loss to staindman's 94 Mariners would have to give up nine runs to not get the team win. With four Ruthian homers, BastanRedsox is the clubhouse leader for individual immunity. staindman would need a 4 HR game from Junior or Taint would have to get 5 from Robinson to overtake Bastan.

Posted by FishNasty on 8/31/2010 12:31:00 AM (view original):
Wow.  F off delta.  I wouldn't have even played if I knew it would come to this.

take it easy taint...I'm not that ****** about...others can say they dont like it and thats fine...I say it and I'm told to F off?  Relax.  Whether I agree with it or not, josh made the decision and his decision is what matters.  He made it pretty quick too which I aplaud.  I bicker and whine sometimes, but don't take me too seriously.  This is just a game.  Its a great game.  These survivor games are one of the best things going on the site.

josh, as I'm sure pretty much everyone here would agree, you are doing a great job with this. 

Posted by The Taint on 8/31/2010 12:29:00 AM (view original):
There is no crying in baseball.

lol, tell that to Pinella

***WE INTERRUPT YOUR REGULARLY SCHEDULED PROGRAMMING TO BRING YOU RIC FLAIR***

Posted by deltagorfers on 8/31/2010 2:33:00 AM (view original):

Posted by FishNasty on 8/31/2010 12:31:00 AM (view original):
Wow.  F off delta.  I wouldn't have even played if I knew it would come to this.

take it easy taint...I'm not that ****** about...others can say they dont like it and thats fine...I say it and I'm told to F off?  Relax.  Whether I agree with it or not, josh made the decision and his decision is what matters.  He made it pretty quick too which I aplaud.  I bicker and whine sometimes, but don't take me too seriously.  This is just a game.  Its a great game.  These survivor games are one of the best things going on the site.

josh, as I'm sure pretty much everyone here would agree, you are doing a great job with this. 

There is a BIG difference to say you don't like a decision rather than insisiting you get preferintial treatment. 

Also, way to be a ***** about something.  You ***** about a decision, and then in your next post you applaud his quick decision making and accept it?  Either stand your ground and fight for what you believe is right, or don't ***** at all. 

Maybe you wanted to play again cause you know you are going home with this loss?

I go away for a weekend with spotty internet time and am lost when I come back.

my computer is on the fritz.. i am taking it in today..so please everyone vote for me..its not fair if i stay and i cant play any games. thanks everyone..
its basically like a survivor injury on the show.
thanks,
nate
probably be back this weekend

so, at this point, The Taint would have to lose by more then 9 runs for team 1 not to win?

and Staind is gone so the game is vs. Sparky?

ps complaining about a decision and not offering a better one is stoopid.

Posted by FishNasty on 8/31/2010 9:55:00 AM (view original):

Posted by deltagorfers on 8/31/2010 2:33:00 AM (view original):

Posted by FishNasty on 8/31/2010 12:31:00 AM (view original):
Wow.  F off delta.  I wouldn't have even played if I knew it would come to this.

take it easy taint...I'm not that ****** about...others can say they dont like it and thats fine...I say it and I'm told to F off?  Relax.  Whether I agree with it or not, josh made the decision and his decision is what matters.  He made it pretty quick too which I aplaud.  I bicker and whine sometimes, but don't take me too seriously.  This is just a game.  Its a great game.  These survivor games are one of the best things going on the site.

josh, as I'm sure pretty much everyone here would agree, you are doing a great job with this. 

There is a BIG difference to say you don't like a decision rather than insisiting you get preferintial treatment. 

Also, way to be a ***** about something.  You ***** about a decision, and then in your next post you applaud his quick decision making and accept it?  Either stand your ground and fight for what you believe is right, or don't ***** at all. 

Maybe you wanted to play again cause you know you are going home with this loss?

Please, I never insited that we get preferential treatment.  Where did you get that from?  I only asked about equal treatment.  I should have never said it in the first place as you lost your game, rendering the decion meaningless.  HAD you won your game that would have been a different story.  Can't somebody like that a decision was made quickly even though he disagreed with the decision?  I don't expect that every decision made is going to be beneficial for me or my tribe.  You can't please everybody.  Other people on my tribe spoke out about it so I thought I'd voice my opinion as well.   I stated my opinion on the issue and then dropped it. 

Can we just lay this to rest?  ...or are you just trying to keep stoking the fire on this so you can breath easier going into the vote?