Can you clarify "tec has an 8 year old"?

Quote: Originally posted by kcden on 5/15/2010Have you seen the move "Nine"?If so, What the F*ck? 

It is a remake of the absolute classic Fellini film 8 1/2. I cannot believe anyone would see it though when they could just see 8 1/2...was it good?

I have not so I can't answer the 2nd question.

I'd rather not.

No idea.

What type of bubble does someone need to live in to not know Mike's Hard Lemonade has alcohol?

Are all the good ideas gone where every other film is a remake?

Quote: Originally Posted By MikeT23 on 5/14/2010I'm pretty sure tec has an 8 year old. I assume it's one of his boy's friends. I also assume tec does not approve

My boys are 11 and 8.

You wouldn't have known that I was referring to my 10 year old nephew, would you?

I don't think that's the issue. I think they chose to give the 10 year alcohol.

It certainly seems that way.

Evidently not.

The Human Centipede. Is it possible?

Ive seen you suggest putting players in positions that they dont normally play to help their fielding stats. Could a DH or 1b playing at SS/CF get them injured easier?

I wouldn't think so.

I've actually suggested that such a thing would be stupid. But, according to WifS, players develop better by playing more difficult positions. I think that's an exceedingly dumb way to program the game and I doubt it's true. Because it would encourage playing 1B at SS for "maximum development". But, to answer your question, injury risk is directly related to fatigue and health ratings. I don't believe playing a 1B at SS would increase their chances of being injured.

Quote: Originally Posted By tropicana on 5/15/2010

Quote: Originally posted by kcden on 5/15/2010
Have you seen the move "Nine"?

If so, What the F*ck?

It is a remake of the absolute classic Fellini film 8 1/2. I cannot believe anyone would see it though when they could just see 8 1/2...was it good


I couldn't continue to pay attention long enough to tell you for sure (it just didn't seem to have a point), but that probably tells you enough in-and-of itself. I sat on the couch and f**ked around on the computer while my wife watched 2/3 of the movie and turned it off....

Quote: Originally Posted By MikeT23 on 5/15/2010

I wouldn't think so.

I've actually suggested that such a thing would be stupid. But, according to WifS, players develop better by playing more difficult positions. I think that's an exceedingly dumb way to program the game and I doubt it's true. Because it would encourage playing 1B at SS for "maximum development". But, to answer your question, injury risk is directly related to fatigue and health ratings. I don't believe playing a 1B at SS would increase their chances of being injured.

And for my question, by the same token, would it hurt a player's defensive development to play a lesser position than you see them at by projections?

If one were to believe WifS' position on the matter. However, I've looked at my teams, I collect SS who can't hit, and found that it doesn't. Players drafted/signed with similar current ratings and given similar playing time/coaches developed almost exactly as I expected despite not playing SS.

My example: http://www.whatifsports.com/HBD/Pages/Popups/PlayerProfile.aspx?pid=2487564

Over half of his career innings were not at SS. He developed just fine.

Similar starting point:
http://www.whatifsports.com/HBD/Pages/Popups/PlayerProfile.aspx?pid=2881619

Despite playing exclusively at SS, I don't think he's going to make it as a SS.

Will drinking Dos Equis make me more appealing to women?

Yes. However, you won't become the most interesting man in the world.

http://www.whatifsports.com/hbd/Pages/Popups/PlayerProfile.aspx?pid=2019796



This guy wants $1.2M in arby, his long-term demand is 2 years at $4.8M per.

What will his arby and long-term demands be next season?

Mike,

As someone who secretly longs to have 100,000 posts I must ask how do you find time to post in between posting?