Double Cycle... Topic

This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
1/14/2010 8:20 PM
Well to his go to his own with recruiting. You could say take everyone that has 0s in every category if you win with it great! In the end you need to find a setup that works for you to improve each season/4 year cycle.
1/14/2010 8:32 PM
colonel - hard to keep up with your evolving views

opinion #1 (colonel in bold)

"it isnt luck that causes it - it is success - which creates enhanced prestige and opens the window to those better players But its luck to see who drops down and who doesn't, its something that varies from season to season and such players are only available to the elite teams in D2 or D3, further driving a rift between the very good and very bad teams in those divisions."

opinion #2 (again, colonel in bold)

"it isnt luck - with knowledge and analysis one can do a very good job predicting who will drop, who will be available etc - if it appears to be luck to some that reflects their lack of experience and understanding of the process. they should begin by reading the many threads on the topic But you don't know for certain who is going to drop and who isn't, thus there is some luck/unpredictability involved. Like I said before, I'd be much happier if we didn't have drop downs at all...it further muddies the murky water."

As you shift from "it is luck" to "there is some luck/unpredictability involved"....

Please consider what I and others are saying - while there surely is some randomness and significant uncertainty, your opinion #1 "its luck" is surely incorrect. And of course your opinion #2 "there is some luck/unpredictability" is an extremely different proposition and undeniable - in any interesting game there is unpredictability.

The key thing that novices should learn is that there is a lot that can be anlyzed and understood about dropdowns etc - if you think it is luck then you also think that the fielder who happens to adjust to right where the batter hits the ball is just lucky rather than considering the hypothesis that through through knowledge and analysis one can enhance the odds a lot.

But if your opinion is now opinion #2 it is fer sure correct, there is some luck and unpredictability in drop downs.
1/15/2010 7:06 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By metsmax on 1/15/2010
Please consider what I and others are sayin
That is like asking for world peace mets, ain't gonna happen.
1/15/2010 8:17 AM
Just another troll, HD style.

http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1926079 for any of you who are unclear on what I'm referring to.
1/15/2010 8:29 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By metsmax on 1/15/2010

colonel - hard to keep up with your evolving views

opinion #1 (colonel in bold)

"it isnt luck that causes it - it is success - which creates enhanced prestige and opens the window to those better players But its luck to see who drops down and who doesn't, its something that varies from season to season and such players are only available to the elite teams in D2 or D3, further driving a rift between the very good and very bad teams in those divisions."

opinion #2 (again, colonel in bold)

"it isnt luck - with knowledge and analysis one can do a very good job predicting who will drop, who will be available etc - if it appears to be luck to some that reflects their lack of experience and understanding of the process. they should begin by reading the many threads on the topic But you don't know for certain who is going to drop and who isn't, thus there is some luck/unpredictability involved. Like I said before, I'd be much happier if we didn't have drop downs at all...it further muddies the murky water."

As you shift from "it is luck" to "there is some luck/unpredictability involved"....

Please consider what I and others are saying - while there surely is some randomness and significant uncertainty, your opinion #1 "its luck" is surely incorrect. And of course your opinion #2 "there is some luck/unpredictability" is an extremely different proposition and undeniable - in any interesting game there is unpredictability.

The key thing that novices should learn is that there is a lot that can be anlyzed and understood about dropdowns etc - if you think it is luck then you also think that the fielder who happens to adjust to right where the batter hits the ball is just lucky rather than considering the hypothesis that through through knowledge and analysis one can enhance the odds a lot.

But if your opinion is now opinion #2 it is fer sure correct, there is some luck and unpredictability in drop downs.

Both statements say the same thing but using different words. The first comment doesn't say ALL luck as you're purporting that it does, I was just saying that its luck to see who falls down and who doesn't from year to year because each year is different. You're really grabbing at straws to try to form it into an argument here and I don't really understand the basis. I said it was luck, you said it wasn't luck, then I reassured you that there really is some luck in the situation...you're mincing words and missing the point that both comments virtually say the exact same thing.

It isn't my fault that you "can't keep up" when you're trying to make arguments out of nothing.
1/15/2010 9:56 AM
reminding you colonel that before opinion #1 quoted above you said

"I'm more for a level playing field than waiting for the luck of the draw or the "FALL" if you will."

You cant criticize the existing format as "luck of the draw" and "its luck" and when corrected fall back to "there is some luck in it" and now punt saying they mean the same thing

You began by saying dropdowns/pulldowns are corrosive because they are luck. When explained it is primarily not luck, you withdraw to the correct statement that there is some luck in it.

If we agree, great - but if we agree that dropdowns are subject to analysis and skill and only some luck, then the case for eliminating them becomes a lot weaker.

I tend to like features of the game that allow folks who analyze the game and its elements to get better at it - but I fully understand that some folks may prefer a simpler game.
1/15/2010 11:04 AM
Anything colonels can't understand is 'luck' and since he understands very little about HD, to him it is all 'luck'.
1/15/2010 11:06 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By metsmax on 1/15/2010
reminding you colonel that before opinion #1 quoted above you said

"I'm more for a level playing field than waiting for the luck of the draw or the "FALL" if you will."

You cant criticize the existing format as "luck of the draw" and "its luck" and when corrected fall back to "there is some luck in it" and now punt saying they mean the same thing After I said there was luck, you said there wasn't luck, thus I simplified and broke down my statement so you could understand how there's luck involved in the process...I didn't change at all what I was saying, if I did, I would have admitted it. You were almost trying to pass off opinion (we know how the guys will fall) as fact and I almost took exception to it.

You began by saying dropdowns/pulldowns are corrosive because they are luck. When explained it is primarily not luck, you withdraw to the correct statement that there is some luck in it. I re-worded my statement because you said it wasn't/isn't luck.

If we agree, great - but if we agree that dropdowns are subject to analysis and skill and only some luck, then the case for eliminating them becomes a lot weaker.

I tend to like features of the game that allow folks who analyze the game and its elements to get better at it - but I fully understand that some folks may prefer a simpler game. I appreciate closing remarks like this. I understand that I have many "minority" opinions and that things I like personally will probably never be done in a game of this nature and I accept that...as a business/businessman, you've always got to play to the masses. With that said, just because it won't change, that doesn't make my opinion any less valid or worthwhile. If people think twice about something because I've brought it up, then I've succeeded. The blessing and curse of me is that I can find something wrong with everything, but with that said, I'm more than willing to play HD within the confines in which it currently rests/resides.

1/15/2010 11:16 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By zhawks on 1/15/2010
Anything colonels can't understand is 'luck' and since he understands very little about HD, to him it is all 'luck'.

If you'd stop being a hater for once, you might see the validity in my opinions.
1/15/2010 11:17 AM
wow colonels, you have made me appreciate how truly "lucky" i am. to sign high quality dropdowns and pulldowns year in and year out, well... i might just be the luckiest guy in the world! but, i never fully appreciated it until now. i was thinking skill had something to do with it and that's why the same coaches are the ones signing the best classes year after year, but you have shown me the error of my ways. some people are just lucky, and some get the shaft, over and over again. i better start playing the lotto!
1/15/2010 11:23 AM
I said there's some luck in who falls down and who doesn't, not in who signs who and who doesn't...try to keep up.
1/15/2010 11:27 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 1/15/2010I said there's some luck in who falls down and who doesn't, not in who signs who and who doesn't...try to keep up
Actually there is 0 luck. If a player says you are a backup then you can get him to sign with you.
1/15/2010 11:29 AM
all this talk of dropdowns reminds me of the days in the early seasons of Phelan when Z and I were each stalking and staking out possible dropdowns, pulldowns, etc....both of us in the GNAC

5zhawks20-1110-37-63-212-41113ANT At-large Bid
NT (Elite 8)
4zhawks25-610-212-23-214-21317AConf Champion
NT At-large Bid
NT (2nd Round)
3zhawks18-107-311-50-211-559A-Conf Champion
NT At-large Bid
NT (1st Round)
2zhawks31-410-213-18-113-3210A+Conf Champion
CT Champion
NT (Championship Game)
1Sim AI27-611-110-46-111-513A-Conf Champion
NT At-large Bid
National Champion
1/15/2010 11:32 AM
those were the days

5metsmax25-510-213-12-215-1106A+Conf Champion
NT At-large Bid
NT (2nd Round)
4metsmax20-99-310-41-213-319AConf Champion
NT At-large Bid
NT (2nd Round)
3metsmax25-88-112-55-215-132A+Conf Champion
NT At-large Bid
NT (Championship Game)
2metsmax23-128-58-57-210-618A-NT At-large Bid
NT (Final Four)
1Sim AI24-910-38-56-110-6312BCT Champion
NT (Elite 8)
1/15/2010 11:33 AM
◂ Prev 1...3|4|5|6|7...9 Next ▸
Double Cycle... Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.