Who was the most Topic

Can we change our vote?
1/22/2010 3:00 PM
Quote: Originally posted by colonels19 on 1/22/2010Given the team talent...6-2 isn't bad, no? ;)

You lost to a simmy coached team with an rpi of 229. Your best win is against a team with an rpi in the 170s. This schedule was yours too so I can blame you.
1/22/2010 3:01 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By tkimble on 1/22/2010
Quote: Originally posted by colonels19 on 1/22/2010
Given the team talent...6-2 isn't bad, no? ;)

You lost to a simmy coached team with an rpi of 229. I know man, not sure how that happened...I was rather peeved. Your best win is against a team with an rpi in the 170s. This schedule was yours too so I can blame you. I don't know what's to blame...have to get wins here somehow, and if scrub pounding is the way to do it, then so be it. I'm all for exploiting the system. Maybe we can setup an exhib next season or so.
1/22/2010 3:03 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By vandydave on 1/20/2010jakuru
1/22/2010 3:07 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 1/22/2010
Given the team talent...6-2 isn't bad, no? ;)

I too am troubled by bad randomness, including clustering, cloistering, clutching and cloning
1/22/2010 3:14 PM
I know, it puts me into a claustrophobic cavalcade of a conundrum, further compounded by nuances, nuisances, nieces, and nephews.
1/22/2010 3:16 PM
Why doesnt everyone just ignore this guy.
1/22/2010 3:40 PM
oh crap. what about the tandem of swiners and jeffprobst?

remember the "NAC has sac"? that was about six of the most annoying months of the HD forum.

swiner turned out to be a great coach and very helpful user to many others. probst? not so much. . . .

jeff_probst gets my vote
1/22/2010 3:56 PM
i'm almost positive probst was a part of the whole Crum Freedom Conference Conspiracy. Where they threw a game to get an extra team into the NT.
1/22/2010 3:58 PM
Quote: Originally posted by elvis87 on 1/22/2010Why doesnt everyone just ignore this guy.

QFT
1/22/2010 7:47 PM
Quote: Originally posted by mrpolo09 on 1/22/2010i'm almost positive probst was a part of the whole Crum Freedom Conference Conspiracy. Where they threw a game to get an extra team into the NT.

that was funny stuff
1/22/2010 8:19 PM
really polo? he sent me a site mail the minute he took over a rebuilder cinci team in tark... i was/am coaching a little old school down in lexington, i can make that drive in an hour (living in cinci). maybe you can guess the topic?
1/22/2010 10:30 PM
Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 1/22/2010

Quote: Originally Posted By tkimble on 1/22/2010

Quote: Originally posted by colonels19 on 1/22/2010

Given the team talent...6-2 isn't bad, no? ;)

You lost to a simmy coached team with an rpi of 229. I know man, not sure how that happened...I was rather peeved. Your best win is against a team with an rpi in the 170s. This schedule was yours too so I can blame you.

I don't know what's to blame...have to get wins here somehow, and if scrub pounding is the way to do it, then so be it. I'm all for exploiting the system.Maybe we can setup an exhib next season or so.





Exploiting the system? Really? Your rpi is 191. If anything, you're demonstrating for everyone exactly how not to schedule.

How is it possible that someone thinks they're exploiting the system when they're actually crapping the bed?
1/23/2010 12:24 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By coach_billyg on 1/22/2010
Quote: Originally posted by colonels19 on 1/22/2010What you "boobs" all fail to realize is that the CAAF, ARS, and APAP all pale in comparison to the Colonels Intelligence Index (CII) where colonels seems to think he's smarter than he really is and the rest of you think he's dumber than he really is. Once this irons out, then you'll have a solid ranking.
were you being serious about that 50/50 thing? if so, you definitely have it wrong, and are much, much dumber than we give you credit for. at least, much dumber than i give you credit for. i suppose i put you at the limit of what i consider somewhat reasonable for human intelligence, but still comfortably ahead of a mule. if you were serious about that 50/50 thing, i would have to readjust my perception, to somewhere between a mule and a tree
I absolutely can not read that w. out cracking up.
1/23/2010 12:29 AM
Quote: Originally Posted By daalter on 1/23/2010

Quote: Originally Posted By colonels19 on 1/22/2010

Quote: Originally Posted By tkimble on 1/22/2010

Quote: Originally posted by colonels19 on 1/22/2010

Given the team talent...6-2 isn't bad, no? ;)

You lost to a simmy coached team with an rpi of 229. I know man, not sure how that happened...I was rather peeved. Your best win is against a team with an rpi in the 170s. This schedule was yours too so I can blame you.

I don't know what's to blame...have to get wins here somehow, and if scrub pounding is the way to do it, then so be it. I'm all for exploiting the system.Maybe we can setup an exhib next season or so.





Exploiting the system? Really? Your rpi is 191. If anything, you're demonstrating for everyone exactly how not to schedule. You're obviously not looking at the long term ramifications this is going to have for my school, and if you saw my non-con for next year, you'd see that I'm in the process of exploiting the system. Also, my win pct needed help, remember?

How is it possible that someone thinks they're exploiting the system when they're actually crapping the bed? Next season's non-con...better recruits...I'm going to make scrub pounding a science. Unlike all of you guys, I'd rather schedule 10 scrubs and go 10-0 than schedule 10 tough teams and go 0-10 and get blown the eff out. Bring on the Ws. I would rather advance on the laurels of success than on the haunches of failure and glitchy seeding.
1/23/2010 10:29 AM
◂ Prev 1...3|4|5|6|7...10 Next ▸
Who was the most Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.