Posted by bad_luck on 1/30/2018 10:48:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 1/30/2018 10:45:00 AM (view original):
I will repeat if the Memo released illuminates more on the video that I posted, that to me was riveting then I want to see it otherwise I still do but not as much. Why is that so hard to comprehend? Please explain.

The memo was written by Nunes. Might as well be Hannity writing it.

OMG you are criticizing something that has not been released yet. May I please just read it? I don't care about Mueller or anything else. I just want to see the darn memo.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/26484/good-riddance-fbi-deputy-director-mccabe-who-ben-shapiro

I respect Ben's opinion.

Posted by cccp1014 on 1/30/2018 11:07:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 1/30/2018 10:48:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 1/30/2018 10:45:00 AM (view original):
I will repeat if the Memo released illuminates more on the video that I posted, that to me was riveting then I want to see it otherwise I still do but not as much. Why is that so hard to comprehend? Please explain.

The memo was written by Nunes. Might as well be Hannity writing it.

OMG you are criticizing something that has not been released yet. May I please just read it? I don't care about Mueller or anything else. I just want to see the darn memo.

You’re not getting it.

Think of it this way. If the shittiest, most partisan, hackiest, Dem politician put out a memo criticizing Trump, would you take it seriously?

Yes Boris. You've made your mancrush on Shapiro very apparent.

Shapiro's statement (quoted (from your post) below:

"Some Republicans who have read the memo have hinted heavily that it contains information that could unravel the entire Mueller investigation, long described by the president as a “witch hunt.”

The precise contents of the memo remain unknown. However, it’s believed to contain allegations that the FBI did not adequately explain to a clandestine court that some of the information it used in a surveillance warrant application for Trump adviser Carter Page came from opposition research funded by the Clinton campaign, now known as the “Steele dossier.”

CLEARLY uses the phrase "some Republicans who have read the MEMO"........... does it not?

Do you know that the MEMO is Nunes spin on the full "investigation" which (the COMPLETE version) ONLY one Republican has seen (and 1 Dem.)
and those that have spoken about it (of those that have seen it,----1 Dem.) have stated that Nunes MEMO is a complete misrepresentation of what the full "investigation" has to say? Thus Shapiro's (whoever HE is?) statement is about REPUBLICANS who have seen only the MEMO. Apparently not even all of them! I say so what?

If it's all about the Steele Dossier being used than I say BFD!

Posted by laramiebob on 1/30/2018 11:36:00 AM (view original):

Yes Boris. You've made your mancrush on Shapiro very apparent.

Shapiro's statement (quoted (from your post) below:

"Some Republicans who have read the memo have hinted heavily that it contains information that could unravel the entire Mueller investigation, long described by the president as a “witch hunt.”

The precise contents of the memo remain unknown. However, it’s believed to contain allegations that the FBI did not adequately explain to a clandestine court that some of the information it used in a surveillance warrant application for Trump adviser Carter Page came from opposition research funded by the Clinton campaign, now known as the “Steele dossier.”

CLEARLY uses the phrase "some Republicans who have read the MEMO"........... does it not?

Do you know that the MEMO is Nunes spin on the full "investigation" which (the COMPLETE version) ONLY one Republican has seen (and 1 Dem.)
and those that have spoken about it (of those that have seen it,----1 Dem.) have stated that Nunes MEMO is a complete misrepresentation of what the full "investigation" has to say? Thus Shapiro's (whoever HE is?) statement is about REPUBLICANS who have seen only the MEMO. Apparently not even all of them! I say so what?

If it's all about the Steele Dossier being used than I say BFD!

No offense but I trust Ben's opinion over yours.

I want to see the damn memo. What did you think of the Jim Jordan video?

Posted by bad_luck on 1/30/2018 11:30:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 1/30/2018 11:07:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 1/30/2018 10:48:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 1/30/2018 10:45:00 AM (view original):
I will repeat if the Memo released illuminates more on the video that I posted, that to me was riveting then I want to see it otherwise I still do but not as much. Why is that so hard to comprehend? Please explain.

The memo was written by Nunes. Might as well be Hannity writing it.

OMG you are criticizing something that has not been released yet. May I please just read it? I don't care about Mueller or anything else. I just want to see the darn memo.

You’re not getting it.

Think of it this way. If the shittiest, most partisan, hackiest, Dem politician put out a memo criticizing Trump, would you take it seriously?

So you? He he he

Sorry could not resist.

I watched the Jim Jordan video and to me it sounds like his theory could be correct. At least in reading the body language of the FBI Director.

Boris. My only point was that Shapiro's statement is easy to agree with (I do!) because it doesn't say ANYTHING.
It just says that some republicans hint about what Nunes MEMO says. Big deal!

Please tell me WHAT is so significant about Jim Jordan's video (I can't view it) and WHO Jim Jordan is. TY!

He is a congressman from Ohio. Listen to it!!! I am sure you can get YouTube on your pc or your phone. Google Jim Jordan Chris Wray

Jordan kicked off his line of questioning with the following, “Director, did Peter Strozk help produce and present the application to the FISA court to secure a warrant to spy on Americans associated with the Trump campaign?”

Wray didn’t want to go there.

Let’s remember a couple of things about the dossier,” he said. “The Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign, which we now know were one and the same, paid the law firm who paid Fusion GPS who paid Christopher Steele who then paid Russians to put together a report that we call a dossier full of all kinds of fake news, National Enquirer garbage and it’s been reported that this dossier was all dressed up by the FBI, taken to the FISA court and presented as a legitimate intelligence document — that it became the basis for a warrant to spy on Americans.” […]

“The easiest way to clear it up is tell us what’s in that application and who took it there,” Jordan said. […]

Jordan finished with this: “Here’s what I think — I think Peter Strozk … Mr. Super Agent at the FBI, I think he’s the guy who took the application to the FISA court and if that happened, if this happened, if you have the FBI working with a campaign, the Democrats’ campaign, taking opposition research, dressing it all up and turning it into an intelligence document so they can take it to the FISA court so they can spy on the other campaign, if that happened, that is as wrong as it gets.”

The grilling comes amid reports Trump-hating FBI agent Peter Strzok played a key role in analyzing the infamous ‘Trump dossier,’ supplied by shady research firm Fusion GPS.

Posted by cccp1014 on 1/30/2018 11:55:00 AM (view original):
He is a congressman from Ohio. Listen to it!!! I am sure you can get YouTube on your pc or your phone. Google Jim Jordan Chris Wray

Jordan kicked off his line of questioning with the following, “Director, did Peter Strozk help produce and present the application to the FISA court to secure a warrant to spy on Americans associated with the Trump campaign?”

Wray didn’t want to go there.

Let’s remember a couple of things about the dossier,” he said. “The Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign, which we now know were one and the same, paid the law firm who paid Fusion GPS who paid Christopher Steele who then paid Russians to put together a report that we call a dossier full of all kinds of fake news, National Enquirer garbage and it’s been reported that this dossier was all dressed up by the FBI, taken to the FISA court and presented as a legitimate intelligence document — that it became the basis for a warrant to spy on Americans.” […]

“The easiest way to clear it up is tell us what’s in that application and who took it there,” Jordan said. […]

Jordan finished with this: “Here’s what I think — I think Peter Strozk … Mr. Super Agent at the FBI, I think he’s the guy who took the application to the FISA court and if that happened, if this happened, if you have the FBI working with a campaign, the Democrats’ campaign, taking opposition research, dressing it all up and turning it into an intelligence document so they can take it to the FISA court so they can spy on the other campaign, if that happened, that is as wrong as it gets.”

The grilling comes amid reports Trump-hating FBI agent Peter Strzok played a key role in analyzing the infamous ‘Trump dossier,’ supplied by shady research firm Fusion GPS.

You’re editorializing. Does Strzok hate Trump? Is Fusion shady?

TY Boris. IF that is actually true (what happened) then Mr. Strzok should be in big trouble. Fired at least.

However, I was informed somehow recently (read or heard on the news somewhere) that the reason the FBI gave credence to the dossier was because it CONFIRMED certain events/things that they had uncovered from "other sources" (I believe this is Australian intel) and that (thus) that gave them probable cause to go to the FISA Ct. for approval.

If both accounts are true,..... Then punish Strzok, but "Good on us" for getting whatever intel led to finding out the truth about any possible interference and shenanigans with our election of the POTUS!

Remember that Nunes walked over and saw classified documents that we haven't been told of the contents. Perhaps once this all comes to light we will know the truth...

Such documents are not all stored in one location.

Posted by laramiebob on 1/30/2018 12:13:00 PM (view original):
TY Boris. IF that is actually true (what happened) then Mr. Strzok should be in big trouble. Fired at least.

However, I was informed somehow recently (read or heard on the news somewhere) that the reason the FBI gave credence to the dossier was because it CONFIRMED certain events/things that they had uncovered from "other sources" (I believe this is Australian intel) and that (thus) that gave them probable cause to go to the FISA Ct. for approval.

If both accounts are true,..... Then punish Strzok, but "Good on us" for getting whatever intel led to finding out the truth about any possible interference and shenanigans with our election of the POTUS!

Anyway to me the video was fairly poignant and the FBI director did not deny any of it. I want to know more.

Posted by bad_luck on 1/30/2018 12:12:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 1/30/2018 11:55:00 AM (view original):
He is a congressman from Ohio. Listen to it!!! I am sure you can get YouTube on your pc or your phone. Google Jim Jordan Chris Wray

Jordan kicked off his line of questioning with the following, “Director, did Peter Strozk help produce and present the application to the FISA court to secure a warrant to spy on Americans associated with the Trump campaign?”

Wray didn’t want to go there.

Let’s remember a couple of things about the dossier,” he said. “The Democratic National Committee and the Clinton campaign, which we now know were one and the same, paid the law firm who paid Fusion GPS who paid Christopher Steele who then paid Russians to put together a report that we call a dossier full of all kinds of fake news, National Enquirer garbage and it’s been reported that this dossier was all dressed up by the FBI, taken to the FISA court and presented as a legitimate intelligence document — that it became the basis for a warrant to spy on Americans.” […]

“The easiest way to clear it up is tell us what’s in that application and who took it there,” Jordan said. […]

Jordan finished with this: “Here’s what I think — I think Peter Strozk … Mr. Super Agent at the FBI, I think he’s the guy who took the application to the FISA court and if that happened, if this happened, if you have the FBI working with a campaign, the Democrats’ campaign, taking opposition research, dressing it all up and turning it into an intelligence document so they can take it to the FISA court so they can spy on the other campaign, if that happened, that is as wrong as it gets.”

The grilling comes amid reports Trump-hating FBI agent Peter Strzok played a key role in analyzing the infamous ‘Trump dossier,’ supplied by shady research firm Fusion GPS.

You’re editorializing. Does Strzok hate Trump? Is Fusion shady?

I actually cut and pasted. What did I editorialize?

Posted by cccp1014 on 1/30/2018 10:32:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 1/30/2018 10:28:00 AM (view original):
CCCP, just use logic.

I am using the force. What do you have against the force?



I will do as my main man Ben Shapiro does. This is off his site. No offense tangy, but I respect his opinion more than yours or even my own!!

Some Republicans who have read the memo have hinted heavily that it contains information that could unravel the entire Mueller investigation, long described by the president as a “witch hunt.”

The precise contents of the memo remain unknown. However, it’s believed to contain allegations that the FBI did not adequately explain to a clandestine court that some of the information it used in a surveillance warrant application for Trump adviser Carter Page came from opposition research funded by the Clinton campaign, now known as the “Steele dossier.”

It is written by Devin Nunes. Also note that this is not Shapiro's beliefs, but REPUBLICANS beliefs.

Also, again, what comes out of Nunes's mouth should not be considered fact. Again, it is a 100%tainted perspective.