Posted by ozomatli on 8/9/2020 11:08:00 AM (view original):
Posted by justinlee_24 on 8/3/2020 9:17:00 PM (view original):
still seeking clarity regarding combined and partial seasons (same year as base team). I'll ask it again and give a concrete example to make this easier to answer:
Let's say the base team is the 1997 Oakland Athletics.
Scenario 1: The owner rosters the 1997 Combined Season of Mark McGwire that played for the St. Louis Cardinals.
Does the owner receive a $2 million bonus to his or her salary cap or is this version of Mark McGwire considered a player who played for the base team?
Scenario 2: The owner rosters the 1997 Partial Season Mark McGwire that only played for the St. Louis Cardinals.
Same question as above.
They are considered part of the base team. I'm just using the franchise that they show up as in WIS. So, for a combined season player, you have the option for them to be base team player or a different franchise player.
I don't understand this answer. The two parts of the answer seem to contradict each other. They are part of the base team seems to indicate no $2M bonus. But then you say you are using the franchise that they show up as in WIS, so twisting to a different franchise would be +2M?
Please, just tell us if we get the $2M bonus in either scenario.