Posted by jastrial on 8/4/2010 5:11:00 PM (view original):

Posted by creilmann on 8/4/2010 3:39:00 PM (view original):
The next great threat to our freedom......


....bike sharing programs.

Yes.  Clearly biking is pushing us ever closer to the New World Order.  In fact, as an avid cyclist I have personally been asked to attend a meeting with the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, the Elders of Zion, and the Illuminati in order to hash out our globalization agenda. 

I'll let you know how it turns out...once I am your overlord

I for one welcome our new two-wheeled overlords.

Hey, who wants to play a game of Shoot the Black President? It's wholesome family fun!

Posted by antonsirius on 8/4/2010 6:58:00 PM (view original):
Hey, who wants to play a game of Shoot the Black President? It's wholesome family fun!

This bothers you?

When I pointed out joy Behar and Gore Vidal talking about shooting Bush on television you reponded that since Behar wasnt famous and Vidal was past his prime it didnt matter. Now some guy in a church carnival makes a shooting game and you feel this is important to discuss?

So can we compare his writing history to Vidal's? How about his attandance versus Behar's ratings?

You are such a hypocrite. Any excuse for a Bush attacker, no defense for an Obama attacker!

Posted by creilmann on 8/4/2010 6:03:00 PM (view original):
The Constitution does not recognize illegal immigrants as invading foreign nationals, which is what it does call for protection from.

And unless you've been watching FOX news your whole life, you would know that Obama has dedicated more resource to border enforcement than any other President has.

Why wouldnt Illegal Immigrants be foreign nationals?

Obama has dedicated more resources to ICE and border enforcement. I admit that freely. It is the way they are being used.

Posted by rcrusso on 8/4/2010 6:10:00 PM (view original):
trying a rational response with swamp does not work. If he can not find a teabagger talking point to repeat he will just ignore you. I have decided making fun of him is as effective as arguing with him. Also, never speak directly to him.He likes to think that makes him credible. I find speaking over him or about him is much more effective.

Actually trying to have a conversation with you never works. I have asked you to defend multiple postions you have raised, and you always refuse. Nothing you say can be supported by you.

sorry, I'm not the problem...you clearly are!

It calls for the common defense of the nation.  Can you make an argument that illegal immigrants are perpetrating a hostile invasion of our nation?  In fact, immigration had no restrictions during the founding of this country.  It wasn't until the 14th amendment that immigration and citizenship were given some sort of restriction.

Posted by antonsirius on 8/4/2010 6:58:00 PM (view original):
Hey, who wants to play a game of Shoot the Black President? It's wholesome family fun!

Looks like good clean fun for the whole family! 

I can't believe 21% in the poll thinks this is ok. 

You should read the comments... all the classics are there. You've got your "libruls can't take a joke" justification, your "it's not really Obama" justification (because shooting a random black guy is so much better), and your "libruls burned Bush in effigy and the librul media ignored it" justification. Plus a sprinkling of "Obama's a commiemuslimsocialist who's destroying the country".

You all them justifications, and act like it doesnt make it right.

My question is where was your outrage when all this stuff was happening to Bush? Can you act like this is horrible if it happened for 8 years to Bush and no one cared? 

If you want me to rundown the list again I can, but you know what they are. Why is it suddenly the President is off limits?

Liberals always seem to be very upset when their side gets a personal slam, but never seem to care when it is the other way?

Lets do an example....

Kathy Griffin, comedian, recently called Senator Scott Brown's Daughters Prostitutes. I know Kathy Griffin and I think she is funny and the line was tasteless, but that is who she is. I am not slamming her but...

I wonder how jokes about Obama's kids would go over?

My question is where was your outrage when Bush and the Republicans were spending out of control and running the deficit into record territory? Can you act like this is horrible if it happened for 8 years under Bush and no one cared? 

If you want me to rundown the list again I can, but you know what they are. Why is it suddenly so outrageous under Obama? 

Conservatives always seem to be very upset when their side is out of power, but never seem to care when they are the ones spending billions of unchecked dollars?

Good ole' Swamp.  When we start getting down to serious topics, he runs with vague arguments (see his immigration is a problem because Obama sucks contribution) until somebody comes in with a good fluff piece he can sink his teeth to. He loves to claim that nobody will have a serious conversation about the issues, yet here we are, a few of us starting a decent conversation on immigration that he could easily jump in on and he chooses to go instead with the he said/she said debate.  His hope now is to argue about this useless crap for another 5 pages so he can play his usual conservative martyr role that nobody has ever bought.

Conservatives don't spend billions of unchecked dollars.  That is what happens when the Repugs become the Democraps of the 70s.  JFK is even to the right of the tards from the Repugs.

Sorry to jump back a few pages in the conversation, but maybe Sharron Angle avoiding anything like real journalists actually does provide her with her only shot at winning, given the insane things she's prone to saying...

Angle claims entitlement spending violates the 1st Commandment

Yes, that says commandment and not amendment. She apparently believes that entitlements are designed to turn government into a false god. Social Security and Medicare are the golden calf, and Nancy Pelosi is Edward G Robinson.

I'm sure swamp will jump in here any second and claim I just said all conservative women are crazy, but I'm more interested in mykids' reaction. Is this really a candidate you want to get behind?