NEW GUYS world is corrupt! Topic

Nor can I see any decent owner paying $$ to join New Guys World. Seems like a Dramacentric Tardfest from the World Chat. I feel for the handful of decent owners stuck in that league.
2/1/2010 11:31 AM
No one is stuck in a league.
2/1/2010 11:37 AM
True. let me re-phrase:

I feel for any owner who has invested multiple seasons with honesty and dedication and now finds themselves surrounded in TardWorld.
2/1/2010 11:42 AM
Quote: Originally posted by seattleace21 on 1/30/2010Which one of these two trades would YOU veto?

http://www.whatifsports.com/HBD/Pages/Popups/PlayerProfile.aspx?pid=2960603

FOR

http://www.whatifsports.com/HBD/Pages/Popups/PlayerProfile.aspx?pid=1797124

PLUS 5 million dollars

________________ OR ______________

http://www.whatifsports.com/HBD/Pages/Popups/PlayerProfile.aspx?pid=1894268

FOR

http://www.whatifsports.com/HBD/Pages/Popups/PlayerProfile.aspx?pid=1799098

PLUS 2 million dollars

___________________________________

Obviously, the latter...but not in the New Guys world.

The New Guys world has a monopolistic set of veterans owners that have the vetoing power to blockade anything from happening, unless it benefits them. Since the first day I logged into this league, I realized it was a mistake.

The commissioner has found loopholes in the system to build his team, the veterans, particularly pvc's co-worker, e_mandat, support this as they pick up the scraps.

I have watched countless new and semi-veteran owners complain and bash the league commish, but WIS has done nothing.

This has been reported to Fox Sports AND MSN, but for your own sake...DO NOT join this league!



You really think these trades are similar? Well let's just look at them. The first one, the one that you made (and got vetoed), was basically one owner trading away a stud pitching prospect (Olson) for a minor league CF'er (Riley) and $5 mil. The only reason Olson was being traded in the first place is it looks like his owner is in need of money.

The other trade, the one that wasn't vetoed, was one that I initiated and I believe that you think I got, for lack of a better word, screwed. Let me just explain it to you.

I had two AAA 2nd basemen, but really only needed one of them. I decided to go with Eli Park ( http://www.whatifsports.com/HBD/Pages/Popups/PlayerProfile.aspx?pid=2186195 ) over Clint Lambert. For several reason, one major one being Lambert's health, 46, is nothing close to Park's, 99. Park's numbers thus far in his rookie season (279 AB's, 16 HR, 48 RBI's, .280 BA) and the fact that Lambert has already suffered an injury since he was traded show I made the correct decision between the two.

Then, one of my starting pitchers went down for 70+ days, so now I need a starter. I don't have a ML ready one, but I do have a injury plagued 2nd prospect, Lambert, to wheel and deal. So I made the offer of Lambert for McLaughlin (plus 2 mil). Like I mentioned, Lambert has already been injured, and this won't be this last one. It's looking like he won't be playing a full 15-20 years in the bigs, but I now have a much needed starter in McLaughlin.

Two very different trades if you actually know all of the facts.
2/1/2010 7:03 PM
Doesn't everyone think their trade is OK while the one they vetoed sucks *** and damages the world?

2/1/2010 7:27 PM
pretty much, unless they're knowingly trade raping to see if they can get away with it
2/1/2010 7:38 PM
◂ Prev 123456
NEW GUYS world is corrupt! Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.