So what I realized is that I built this team after the way I actually play: tough defense, gritty, post-oriented, but enough outside shooting to keep people/teams honest. And fouls. Oh, the fouls.

2pt%#	3pt%#	eFG%	OReb%	DReb%	Ast%	Stl%	Blk%
96-97 Anthony Mason	PF	17.6	52.4	33.1	52.5	7.0	22.5	17.5	1.1	0.6
95-96 Anfernee Hardaway	PG	25.5	57.1	31.1	54.9	4.9	8.1	23.9	2.5	0.8
05-06 Kevin Garnett	PF	25.6	53.2	26.5	52.9	8.3	27.9	14.3	1.7	2.2
13-14 Anthony Davis	PF	25.4	51.9	22.1	52.0	9.5	22.3	5.7	1.7	4.8
07-08 Jamario Moon	SF	14.7	52.5	32.6	52.0	4.8	20.4	5.3	1.8	3.0
14-15 Josh Smith	SF	24.5	48.7	32.9	49.1	7.4	16.5	13.5	1.6	2.7
10-11 Jeff Teague	PG	20.4	44.7	37.3	46.7	1.3	10.6	19.0	2.2	1.6

Wasn't Shawn Kemp available when mikee1 took Ewing? That's who I thought he should have taken.

Posted by vancem on 3/23/2016 12:06:00 AM (view original):
Wasn't Shawn Kemp available when mikee1 took Ewing? That's who I thought he should have taken.

yea but then he teams up with harden and wilt to form the turnover trio of death...amare has very good tov%

True the turnovers will be a bit of an issue already with Wilt and Harden. I'd like to see how Wilt and Ewing match up with Gilmore and Duncan. Harden vs Pierce will also be interesting.

using the Ewing seasons that are 100% PF strike me as reach pick

I'm pretty sure mikee said he's using a season of Ewing that's 98% at PF

Good stuff, dh, keep it coming!

You are of course right that Ron Harper doesn't really fit on my team. I think I have just enough 3s overall, but more from the starting SG would have been helpful. I will argue that he belong in this league; he passes more and defends better than the Moncrief season with which I won a title and that others have drafted in recent seasons.

Honestly, I couldn't come up with a similar player who could also help with floor spacing. I needed the assists Harper provides, and also at the time felt like I needed that level of defense and FTAs because of who I figured I'd be stuck with as my starting PF (not knowing Oakley would slide that far).

I was mighty surprised Tinsley was available, since I've seen him reached for in the fifth round. And yes, I'm using Oakley's 87-88 season. It does have some warts but no gapingly awful skin conditions. Better shooters will be taking most of the shots, his negatives aren't too bad, and he's a better defender than anyone else I could see available who was a comparable rebounder.

I'd say you needed that additional 17% asg that Hollywood brings since Mookie isn't going to bring you much more than 26% in his best seasons

LTB, thanks for the new team name.

Yeah dh, I'm not sure if the oreb overkill is going to work. Wanted to try something different and with Malone I decided to build on his strength. Not sure if I have enough defense either.
And yeah, got really lucky with KJ and a backup SF that went undrafted. I had a list of 7 guys after my Drummond pick, KJ and Rondo were the only ones left. Rondo wouldn't have added any threes though and I needed outside shooters with Malone/Drummond in the post.

KG, Penny, Brow, J-Moon, and Mase...I'm sorry. I really messed this up.

Teague and J-"Smooth"...Thank God for partial seasons.

Why are you using 10-11 Teague jh?

@dh555

May be I should have used the best Marion season which indeed is 05-06 . Still, that leaves me with big dilemma for the 4th round. I am not sure whether there was someone worth giving up Frazier in the 3rd nor a good SF replacement for the 4th round Bynum pick. Maybe I should have done differently starting with 1st or 2nd, and next time, I will make sure to take care of usage earlier. Please enlighten me with how I should have done.

Nice eval dh. Curious if consensus is Russell should be a third rounder but 1 idiot takes him every year to keep his value as late first/second: or is it just a odl/dh thing where he should go 20 spots lower in this l league. I was wavering on 13/14 vs 10/11 Love so your eval prob got me to switch to 13/14. I had more than 7300 FGA, 100% usg and 14 usg pts in starting 5 with 10/11 which isn't bad, Of course 106% would perhaps be better. I do get 6% Ast bump and even more threes, but i do sacrifice rebounding. Still not sure if I made right call.