Canucks Thread - We Still Believe Topic

You bastards better beat the snot out of SJ in the conference finals.
5/3/2010 9:22 PM
Canucks problem all year no killer instinct,sitting back not attacking,they deserve what happens to them..
5/3/2010 11:06 PM
Boy, you guys gave that one away tonight. Hawks owned you in the last two periods.

5/3/2010 11:32 PM
Quote: Originally posted by nickhead on 5/03/2010Swwwweeeeeeeeeppppppp. Get your brooms out

Would you like ketchup, mustard or both to spread on those words while you eat them?
5/3/2010 11:44 PM
Quote: Originally posted by randle44 on 5/03/2010ok,here's the game plan..you know VCR will be shorthanded atleast 3 or 4 times in the 1st period,Bettman wants the Hawks to win ..so you might as well make them worthwhile, come out flying and run over Niemi,just like Glen Anderson used to do,next you take a boarding call against Kane run him thru the glass if you have too..next up Hossa,just in case he has any thoughts of showing up you quash those in the 1st period..Toews? well Toews is Canadian you cant faze him,mentally tough.. now youve eliminated Niemi again and Hossa who probably wasnt going to show up anyway..Kane is a toss up,he's like a cockroach.he may still surface to hurt you ,but hey you tried..last penalty would be on Sharp,he is French Canadian ,i beleive ?so he probably has his golf vacation tenatively planned for S.Carolina anyway but you face wash any courage out of him early..4 penalties ,you hope Luongo can stand on his head..and its game on,pop a few easy ones on Niemi again and you go home up 2-0.thats the way i would draw it up on the chalk board in the Canuck room

Was that enough Hossa and Niemi for ya?

Draw this up.....SEE YA IN VANCOUVER!!!
5/3/2010 11:45 PM
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
5/3/2010 11:54 PM
I thought it was a good game besides the final score. Vancouver had enough chances to keep the game close as Chicago was dominating the last two periods. Kesler should have passed on the 3 on 1 but hind sight is 20/20.

Next game will be another great one but with a differant result.
5/4/2010 12:47 AM
Quote: Originally posted by peter_puck on 5/03/2010Well they can only do so much andru. They can put a team on the PP most of the game (like Pittsburgh in game 1) but if the weaker team (in this case Chicago) doesn't have the talent or drive to take advantage of it, they're still going to lose.

So...by my count that was 6 powerplays for the Canucks and 2 for the Hawks...case closed.
5/4/2010 8:47 AM
Too bad the Hawks aren't the weaker team.

I love the sour grapes. They taste so sweet when washng down a victory.
5/4/2010 8:50 AM
There were a lot of breakaways for Chicago. Vancouver's defense needs to step up and save Luongo.
5/4/2010 9:06 AM
It's interesting...Vancouver's aggressive defense was a strength in game 1 and a weakness in game 2. That's where coaching adjustments come into play. We'll see how Vigneault reacts to Quenneville and the Hawks utilizing the stretch pass more when the Canuck D is pinching in.
5/4/2010 9:31 AM
Am I allowed to complain about the refs or talk about conspiracy theories yet randle?... or Vancouver fans still dont do that? or whatever is convenient at the time?

Canucks in 5, it was Luigi's fault
5/4/2010 11:33 AM
This post could not be converted. To view the original post's thread, click here.
5/4/2010 4:01 PM
I dont complain about the refs,i do about Luongo but not in this series..i guess you didnt pick up on my sarcasm re: refs? its ok nickhead ,i guess you had to tend to the farm while pa worked the fields..no time for school?

Ive been too disgusted to post for 2 days because ive been ****** off with the Canucks,same old BS ,sit back and defend,how many f-ckin times do you need to get burnt to know that VCR CANNOT sit back and defend,they WILL LOSE!..you hear Henrik and Kesler talking about sticking to their game and this year is different..well it sure the f-ck didnt look different in game 2..there was no intensity,absolutely no killer instinct,they had numerous opportunities to get the 3rd goal,all they did was pass the puck around on the pp looking all fancy and ****,looking for the pretty play..it was sickening!..i couldnt stand it any more i knew in the 2nd period they were toast and maybe thatll be the defining moment again this year,when they look back..this team has the foot on the throat and continually lets the enemy up to fight again..big deal you got a split,you should be up 2-0,its going to be tough to win both in VCR..they just threw away another good goaltending display by Luongo because nobody wants to get their nose dirty and bear down on the pp..maybe Luongo is just average tonite and Friday and the Canucks are down 3-1? then you look back and think geez we had that game 2 if we just didnt sit back and become perimeter players we couldve won that game..**** like that makes me think this team isnt ready to challenge the top teams,and surprisingly the only Canuck that shares my views is Luongo ,he was ****** also and thought the team sat back too much..just like game 4 last year.

5/5/2010 5:59 PM
Maybe Vigneault should get Johnson to shadow Kane,he has the last change,he's really the only guy that is doing anything for the Hawks,Hossa is invisible others have been average..let Burish shoot all he wants they can wash the black rubber off Luongo's crest during the intermissions
5/5/2010 6:06 PM
◂ Prev 1...60|61|62|63|64...213 Next ▸
Canucks Thread - We Still Believe Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.