Something needs to change Topic

whitey34
Posts: 201 (0)
Hall of Famer
47 1
Prospect
Actually it's short for white chocolate from playing bball and playing against some brothers at a camp I worked at in the summer. Got the nickname because I could hang with them. So again you swing and miss with your assumption.
8/15/2012 7:33 AM
p6453
Posts: 828 (0)
Hall of Famer
290 1
Prospect
Posted by whitey34 on 8/15/2012 7:33:00 AM (view original):
Actually it's short for white chocolate from playing bball and playing against some brothers at a camp I worked at in the summer. Got the nickname because I could hang with them. So again you swing and miss with your assumption.
"White Chocolate"?
I bet you're the next coming of Joe Alexander. It was nice of the brothers to give the waterboy/cheerleader such a sweet moniker. I'll skip the fact that you used the phrase "brothers" as well.

Anyone up for Fox renaming the website "Whiteyif-Sports"? Like...whitey-if you were smart you'd stop posting. Or, whitey-if you were smart you'd recruit better players.
8/15/2012 8:04 AM
therewas47
Posts: 659 (0)
Hall of Famer
156 1
Prospect
Posted by whitey34 on 8/15/2012 7:33:00 AM (view original):
Actually it's short for white chocolate from playing bball and playing against some brothers at a camp I worked at in the summer. Got the nickname because I could hang with them. So again you swing and miss with your assumption.
8/15/2012 8:26 AM
whitey34
Posts: 201 (0)
Hall of Famer
47 1
Prospect
Wow you guys really need to get a life. Get off the couch and get a job
8/15/2012 8:37 AM
rednation58
Posts: 630 (0)
Hall of Famer
53
Rookie
Posted by whitey34 on 8/15/2012 7:18:00 AM (view original):
Shows your own real intelligence ryrun. Look at the reference for dummy-o. You love to take away and add things to statements. Just like rednation. You guys should run some campaign commercials for Romney and Obama. The 60% comment was in relation to the d off and def. Grading of the other team and not in an average game
Just like rednation what?? Whitey, I havent taken out of context, or willfully misconstrued any statement you have made in this thread. Now if you don't take the time necessary to express a complete thought, whose fault is it if your words are misunderstood? That being said, the point is who complains about shooting 50% in any situation? Let alone someone who shot 50% against a - D and shot no 3's (you shot 2 to be exact)??? Please explain to me what I have taken away or added to any statement you have made...
8/15/2012 9:03 AM
bow2dacowz
Posts: 1135 (0)
Hall of Famer
20 40 415 1 1
Prospect
Posted by whitey34 on 8/15/2012 7:12:00 AM (view original):
For the won't 15th time when 90% of my post have been on a Droid, you think on worried about grammar? And yes I was obviously wrong about a direct athletic d3 scholarship, but isack probably hits in on the head. I went to a community college in northern Michigan for 2 yes and there were were 9 or so inner city black kids on the team. They were the only black kids I ever saw on campus. I had a some classes with a couple and though we never talked scholarships, I do know they didn't work. Pretty obvious why they went to that college because they could ball.
Community College is not the NCAA.  So it's possible they got scholarships based on athletics ability.
8/15/2012 9:32 AM
whitey34
Posts: 201 (0)
Hall of Famer
47 1
Prospect
Because I have agreed 50% is normally good. Said it 3 or 4 times. Read the thread. Fcp is high risk high reward. Normally a terrible pressing team in real life gets blown out. Aka Clemson is a prime example. They have beaten duke by pressing before at Clemson but they get blown out often times on the road
8/15/2012 10:54 AM
rednation58
Posts: 630 (0)
Hall of Famer
53
Rookie
50% is always good if not great. Do you just think for some reason you should shoot 60% against a team you feel is inferior to your own because they run FCP?  I still don't see how I've mangled your words or misquoted you in any way. And you are comparing RL Clemson and Duke to WIS D3 and think you should have the same results? By that logic we should all hate WIS and be angry with our results.

In all seriousness you brought the wolves out by insulting everyone who attempted to help you as I took your suggestion and reread the entire thread. You certainly can't expect to get rational responses from irrational comments.
8/15/2012 11:52 AM
tianyi7886
Posts: 4243 (0)
Hall of Famer
51 33 282 40
Prospect
60% is pretty hard to do whitey. I have pretty strong D3 programs playing in relatively weak conf (empty conf in Tark) and I shoot 60% maybe once a season. 

And you need to differentiate between could and should/will. You could shoot 80% against a terrible team, but that doesn't mean you will shoot 80% against them. This game is all about probability and statistical distribution. Clearly shooting 60% is a tail event. 
8/15/2012 12:11 PM
shafdog70
Posts: 12 (0)
Hall of Famer
124 3 1
Prospect
Is it possible that this is all just a parody?
8/15/2012 12:34 PM
buddhagamer
Posts: 4054 (0)
Hall of Famer
513 249 118
Pro
He actually shot almost 60% in the 2nd half when his opponent's first stringers finally got into foul trouble.  If you take out his 2 3pt attempts, he went 10 for 22 in the first half and 14 for 24 in the 2nd (or 58.3%).

He lost the game due to his inability to stop the other team from scoring, not because his offense was inefficient.  He played yet another FCP opponent two games later and shot significantly worse but still won due to the fact he actually defended (by moving his worst defender from starter to backup).
8/15/2012 12:46 PM (edited)
ryrun
Posts: 452 (0)
Hall of Famer
96
Rookie
Posted by buddhagamer on 8/15/2012 12:46:00 PM (view original):
He actually shot almost 60% in the 2nd half when his opponent's first stringers finally got into foul trouble.  If you take out his 2 3pt attempts, he went 10 for 22 in the first half and 14 for 24 in the 2nd (or 58.3%).

He lost the game due to his inability to stop the other team from scoring, not because his offense was inefficient.  He played yet another FCP opponent two games later and shot significantly worse but still won due to the fact he actually defended (by moving his worst defender from starter to backup).
Get outta here with your statistical analysis and observations.  White Chocolate has no time for any of that nonsense.  You're just another cronie who doesn't understand how real basketball works*.

*Figured I'd save you some time, whitey.
8/15/2012 12:50 PM
angmar
Posts: 219 (0)
Hall of Famer
141
Rookie
Posted by whitey34 on 8/15/2012 7:33:00 AM (view original):
Actually it's short for white chocolate from playing bball and playing against some brothers at a camp I worked at in the summer. Got the nickname because I could hang with them. So again you swing and miss with your assumption.
Wow.
8/15/2012 1:11 PM
dahsdebater
Posts: 10043 (0)
Hall of Famer
284 293 18
Pro
So the brilliant whitey went to community college... shocking.

Yes, I recognize that for some people based on their background getting into community college is seen as a major accomplishment.  I don't think that's the case here.
8/15/2012 1:49 PM
ryrun
Posts: 452 (0)
Hall of Famer
96
Rookie
Posted by dahsdebater on 8/15/2012 1:49:00 PM (view original):
So the brilliant whitey went to community college... shocking.

Yes, I recognize that for some people based on their background getting into community college is seen as a major accomplishment.  I don't think that's the case here.
It's not his fault.  He typed his English assignments up on his droid.  His teacher should have known that he doesn't care about his grammar on his droid.  S/he just didn't understand real English.
8/15/2012 1:53 PM
◂ Prev 1...5|6|7|8|9 Next ▸
Something needs to change Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2026 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.