1. Michael Jordan - I wanted to use him more than Dwight. Best pick? Maybe not. But perimeter defense (without a bunch of other flaws) is harder to find than post defense, in my opinion, so I was glad to lock up 3000+ minutes of a 90+ perimeter defender. Plus relatively efficient, Tier 1 usage. Note: post defense would prove more of an issue than I thought.
2. Shawn Marion - I wanted to ensure I had a SF who could shoot threes given MJ's weakness in that regard (in most seasons). I also wanted good D. I got that here in one package. But Marion can't guard the 5, so I was putting myself in trouble with defense at the 5. I also considered Hassan Whiteside and maybe should have picked him here. As I said here, I think Marion is good value here, but there were plenty of solid wings available later.
3. Pau Gasol - I wanted him in the first iteration. I was glad to see him fall. I think he's good value in the late third. Great 2nd/3rd scorer, good assists, very low towels. Not sure he was a great fit here, though, because it locked me in to decent to solid defense (50-71) for a lot more post minutes and gave away some of the rebounding advantage I had from Jordan and Marion as the wings.
4. Brent Barry - I waited too long on PG last draft. Wasn't going to make that mistake again. I needed a PG with plenty of threes, good efg%, low usage, and solid assists. Barry fit the bill perfectly. I later realized that some of his seasons would leave me a little shorter on assists than I preferred, though.
5. Paul Millsap - some people may think this pick was a reach. But he was a perfect fit for my team and, in my opinion, a critical pick. He allowed me to back up Gasol and Marion with a single player; one who could allow Marion to slide to the 4, at least in part, in the seasons where he's only 98% at the 3. He also provides, at least in some seasons, much-needed post defense. Not a spectacular skill set overall, but solid assists (sometimes over 10%), efficiency, and in some seasons a solid number of threes.
6. Wes Unseld - great value in the 7th last time; still great value in the 5th here. Gave me everything I needed - big boards, clean, better than average assists for a post - with the exception of good defense.
7. Jon Barry - a perfect fit behind his brother. Good efg%, solid assists, not terrible defense. I also considered Darren Collison but gave the edge to Jon Barry based on better efg% and rebounding.
8. Kyle O'Quinn - my second repeat pick from season 1. A great backup for Unseld who brings boards, passing, and D. In hindsight, I probably should have broken ash's heart and taken Ray. I thought I needed O'Quinn's better defense, but I probably should've taken Ray's superior boards at the expense of some defense. But not a big deal.
9. Carmelo Anthony - a backup for MJ. There were guys out there with better individual seasons to backup MJ (we'll get to those) but Melo gave me the security of knowing I would have a credible backup to MJ, with reasonable efficiency and comparable usage, in all 5 seasons. In the end I think he's only going to be backing up MJ in 2-3 seasons.
10. Gordon Hayward - great 19-20 season, and solid 18-19, that will get some run at the 3, displacing some Marion/Millsap minutes. Another season with 27% usage that will backup MJ on a team that has more usage around MJ. Another season that may play a few minutes at the 2 when MJ is playing the 1. Great package in the 10th.
11. TJ McConnell - I needed a few more PG minutes on a couple teams. But McConnell is good enough that he'll supplant Jon Barry on a couple teams as the primary backup (may even start). Surprised he was still here.
12. D'angelo Russell - with the addition of his 1300-minute 2019-20 partial season, that gave him two excellent seasons to back up MJ with 30%+ usage (along with 18-19). I also considered picking another short-minute post here to fill in a few hundred board lord minutes behind Unseld in one season, but thought this was a better use of the pick. Means Gasol will play about 5 mpg of center on one team, which is not ideal for rebounding but not a huge deal.
Overall summary: too much "pretty good," not enough "great." Likely recipe for a similar finish as compared to last year. But this team has fewer holes than last year's team, so maybe I have more upside than I think.