Posted by dahsdebater on 7/15/2012 1:45:00 AM (view original):
You guys are both very intentionally missing the point, and I'm fairly certain you're both smart enough to know it. I'm not remotely old enough to have seen Wilt play live, but I've watched plenty of full games of his (mostly playoffs). As I mentioned previously, for the sake of this conversation I am absolutely NOT going to "normalize" to era. Yes, Wilt was dominant. He was a new kind of player, and the idea of the dominant low post scorer was still very new when Wilt was in his prime. Do you honestly believe Wilt would be the same kind of dominant in today's NBA? I don't. I think he'd be very good, very likely the best center in the NBA. But if you watch Wilt in his prime and Kareem in his prime it seems to me that Wilt's moves don't even come close. He got by on strength, but in today's NBA he wouldn't overpower everyone to nearly the same degree. Certainly didn't have the strength of Shaq, and I wouldn't like Wilt very much in that matchup. In fact, I think Chamberlain would have a hard time scoring effectively against Dik, who was always considered good but not great. Any strong, defensively capable center could really slow down his game. There has never been an era in NBA history in which Michael Jordan or LeBron James wouldn't be dominant. Right now Wilt in his prime would likely go for 20-22 ppg, maybe 12 rebounds. Those are similar to Kareem's career averages. Saying that because Wilt dominated the game unlike anyone else in history and saying that he is the best player in the history of the game are not necessarily the same thing.
Put mostly simply, if you put Wilt in today's NBA do you believe he would dominate as much as LeBron? Do you believe he would be the same kind of unique talent? I don't. Would Jordan be? Hell yes.
Yes, Wilt in his prime, playing today, would dominate more than LeBron.
He might only hit 50% of his FT, but if he played with today's refs, he'd shoot 40 FT a game and foul out the opposing 4 and 5 on a nightly basis. The way to defend Wilt was to beat the **** out of him (way more than Hack-a-Shaq ever got). And refs, by and large, let it happen. That was the equalizer for Wilt's strength (and yes, he had as much strength as anyone, including Shaq). Today's NBA is built around building up the star, not bringing him down to the level of everyone else. Even if Wilt didn't get any superstar calls, and the game was just called straight up, he'd dominate today's game.
Was Wilt stronger than anyone else playing basketball during his era? Yes. But he's also stronger than the guys playing now. And beyond that, he wasn't only power - don't mistake him for an early version of Shaq. With the possible exception of Hakeem, his footwork was arguably the best ever for a big man, and when he was asked to pass, he cut his scoring by 10 points (down to only ~24 ppg) and collected assists instead (630 in 66-67 and 702 (league leader) in 67-68). For the sake of comparison, LeBron James has cracked 600 assists once (651 in 09-10) and has never been higher than 5th on the league.
Do me a favor, before you make the claim that Wilt just got by on strength.
Watch a young Wilt here, and an old Wilt here (some fantastic footage of older Wilt vs prime Kareem and their back and forth).
Don't just look at the dunks, but watch him run, jump, handle the ball, hit turnaround fade away jump shots off glass and finger rolls, and block the sky hook. If you watch those and still think Wilt was just Shaq light, I don't know what to tell you.
7/15/2012 3:27 AM (edited)