49 players taken so far -- a little under half of those from Astros and Tigers:

Tigers 11
Astros 11
Expos 7
Red Sox 6
Mets 5
Brewers 4
Padres 3
Rangers 2

Had the Giants been taken before my pick, I would've have certainly taken the Astros.

Just think... if the Astros and/or Tigers had been selected instead of the Phillies, the quality of the players drafted would have been significantly reduced.

So, since you have od's proxy, just give me one of these guys after juice & od's pick......

1. 1B George Scott
2. 1B Norm Cash
3. 1B Mike Jorgensen

I think I've figured out specs' strategy for this round . . .

and when my pick came up, I was debating between the 'Stros and the Braves.

the main reason I took the White Sox over an NL team was that it looked like there was a greater desparity between the good NL teams that were already taken and what was as a choice for the NL. It appeared that the Sox at least had an even chance in the American League East (now watch me finish dead last in the division). Though I wasn't sure they would be placed in the East when I took them.

Quote: Originally Posted By schwarze on 4/21/2010
Just think... if the Astros and/or Tigers had been selected instead of the Phillies, the quality of the players drafted would have been significantly reduced.

You're welcome

odalisgagne selects Jim Shellenback - P

specsman selects George Scott, 1b

I'll take Norm Cash

Well, we have lots of slugging percentage, but not enough on base percentage...

Ken Singleton, of

Quote: Originally posted by schwarze on 4/21/2010Well, we have lots of slugging percentage, but not enough on base percentage...

Ken Singleton, of

we have no slugging percentage, nor on base percentage...

ss - Luis Aparicio