Posted by Lennybruce26 on 9/8/2025 10:32:00 AM (view original):
President Clinton was hailed for putting 100,000 police officers on city streets around the country.
President Trump cut 1.2 billion from the federal enforcement budget.
He will not defund the billionaires.
He will not put more police on the streets.
He will not make an effort to partner with cities.
He obstructed a crime focused DC government from adding more police by cutting more then a billion from the budget.
He puts no troops in crime ridden cities in red states.

A smaller wrinkle of the budget proposal is playing out at the National Park Service, part of the Interior Department.The administration wants to cut about $1.2 billion from the next park service budget, $900 million of which would be cut from operations, as a way to shift management of hundreds of federal sites to state or tribal governments.

If that's not right...then simply post the article you are referring to. Please try and focus. We all know it's hard for you.

3. He will not put more police on the streets.

Looks like you're confused again. Trump is not with the party that wants to defund the police. That's the other party. Trump doesn't have police.

4. He will not make an effort to partner with cities.

What does that even mean? Partner? Partner? What?.......Partner? Just.........let's move on.

Posted by laramiebob on 9/8/2025 3:55:00 PM (view original):
Silly and OBVIOUS gaslighting!! Talk about nonsensical rambling (BULLSH*T), the only coherent response you offered was to the Clinton mention.
The rest was TOTAL nonsense.

IF I cared about YOU, I'd be very worried.
I don't, so I could care less that you are a tool of evil.
Haven't you heard?
Your side loses after all, in the end!

Silly robot!

A Gruesome Murder Illustrates the Left’s Crime Failures

Repeatedly catching and releasing mentally ill career criminals isn’t genuine compassion, and it certainly doesn’t make anyone safer in American cities.

When the Stupidity reaches MIND-NUMBING Levels....

Tough-On-Crime Democrats Propose ‘100 Strikes And You’re Out’ Law

U.S. — Facing heavy criticism for going easy on violent criminals, a group of Democrats sought to prove that they are tough on crime by proposing a bold new "100 Strikes and You're Out" law.

The new initiative brought forward by Democrats was praised by media outlets as a step in the right direction to hold violent, murderous criminals accountable after they have brazenly committed 100 horrific acts against innocent victims.

"At some point, enough is enough," said Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer. "There is simply a line which no one must cross, and that line is at 100 serious crimes committed. We cannot allow this type of wanton disregard for law and order in our cities, which is why we — the party that is tough on crime — are proposing legislation that will limit the number of chances these criminals have to just 100. No more."

Other prominent Democrats were quick to join the charge. . "Look, we're reasonable," said House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries. "We understand that sometimes people need second chances. And third chances. And seventy-fifth chances. Maybe eighty-ninth chances. But once you have 100 strikes, we're taking a hardline stance. You're out."

At publishing time, Democrats clarified that the "100 Strikes and You're Out" law would only apply to Democrat criminals. Republicans are still one and done.

'Clue' Board Game For Liberals Just Has You Blame The Murder Weapon

‘Why Won’t Conservatives Give Up Their Guns?’ Ask the People Shooting at Them

Democratic leaders expressed dismay that conservatives would continue to refuse to disarm themselves in the face of open, murderous hostility.



2:26Now playing

Today in Stupidity

CHARLIE KIRK WAS RIGHT!!

“first question: a religious one. I’m happy to talk about faith—there’s extensive evidence for the resurrection of jesus christ, intrabiblical and extrabiblical. he lived a perfect life, was crucified, died and rose on the third day, and he is lord and god over all.”

“too many.”

“counting or not counting gang violence?”

FOR CHARLIE