...WOTS in 2.0? Not sure if this has already been addressed. But in battles where multiple teams are VH or H, should we have something that at least gives us an idea where our team falls within the battle?

Posted by pallas on 11/6/2016 5:31:00 PM (view original):
...WOTS in 2.0? Not sure if this has already been addressed. But in battles where multiple teams are VH or H, should we have something that at least gives us an idea where our team falls within the battle?

We do have the considering list. Which will give you a aspect of how much credit and effort a coach has put in the player. Being #1 doesn't mean you're #1 at all in 3.0.

Posted by CoachWard95 on 11/6/2016 5:38:00 PM (view original):

Posted by pallas on 11/6/2016 5:31:00 PM (view original):
...WOTS in 2.0? Not sure if this has already been addressed. But in battles where multiple teams are VH or H, should we have something that at least gives us an idea where our team falls within the battle?

We do have the considering list. Which will give you a aspect of how much credit and effort a coach has put in the player. Being #1 doesn't mean you're #1 at all in 3.0.

I'm familiar with the considering list, Ward.

Posted by pallas on 11/6/2016 5:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by CoachWard95 on 11/6/2016 5:38:00 PM (view original):

Posted by pallas on 11/6/2016 5:31:00 PM (view original):
...WOTS in 2.0? Not sure if this has already been addressed. But in battles where multiple teams are VH or H, should we have something that at least gives us an idea where our team falls within the battle?

We do have the considering list. Which will give you a aspect of how much credit and effort a coach has put in the player. Being #1 doesn't mean you're #1 at all in 3.0.

I'm familiar with the considering list, Ward.

That's what you were asking lol!

Posted by CoachWard95 on 11/6/2016 5:41:00 PM (view original):

Posted by pallas on 11/6/2016 5:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by CoachWard95 on 11/6/2016 5:38:00 PM (view original):

Posted by pallas on 11/6/2016 5:31:00 PM (view original):
...WOTS in 2.0? Not sure if this has already been addressed. But in battles where multiple teams are VH or H, should we have something that at least gives us an idea where our team falls within the battle?

We do have the considering list. Which will give you a aspect of how much credit and effort a coach has put in the player. Being #1 doesn't mean you're #1 at all in 3.0.

I'm familiar with the considering list, Ward.

That's what you were asking lol!

I'm asking about when, on the considering list, multiple teams are at the same interest level.

Posted by pallas on 11/6/2016 5:43:00 PM (view original):

Posted by CoachWard95 on 11/6/2016 5:41:00 PM (view original):

Posted by pallas on 11/6/2016 5:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by CoachWard95 on 11/6/2016 5:38:00 PM (view original):

Posted by pallas on 11/6/2016 5:31:00 PM (view original):
...WOTS in 2.0? Not sure if this has already been addressed. But in battles where multiple teams are VH or H, should we have something that at least gives us an idea where our team falls within the battle?

We do have the considering list. Which will give you a aspect of how much credit and effort a coach has put in the player. Being #1 doesn't mean you're #1 at all in 3.0.

I'm familiar with the considering list, Ward.

That's what you were asking lol!

I'm asking about when, on the considering list, multiple teams are at the same interest level.

The numbers are random and are due to a coin flip so no1 knows.

Yeah, I remember people lamenting the coin flip aspect when 3.0 was first rolled out. So, just to be clear, it doesn't matter how much money I spend on the recruit? If multiple teams are tied on the interest level and with a scholarship, it's a toss up?

Nothing else but the considering list

Posted by cubcub113 on 11/6/2016 6:34:00 PM (view original):
Nothing else but the considering list

Well that's dumb. Fingers crossed, I guess.

Posted by pallas on 11/6/2016 6:29:00 PM (view original):
Yeah, I remember people lamenting the coin flip aspect when 3.0 was first rolled out. So, just to be clear, it doesn't matter how much money I spend on the recruit? If multiple teams are tied on the interest level and with a scholarship, it's a toss up?

Yes

Posted by pallas on 11/6/2016 5:31:00 PM (view original):
...WOTS in 2.0? Not sure if this has already been addressed. But in battles where multiple teams are VH or H, should we have something that at least gives us an idea where our team falls within the battle?

We asked Seble for an email after the recruit signs telling us the % chance we had to sign him. He thought it was too much information because his goal was to keep us all in the dark.

Posted by pallas on 11/6/2016 6:29:00 PM (view original):
Yeah, I remember people lamenting the coin flip aspect when 3.0 was first rolled out. So, just to be clear, it doesn't matter how much money I spend on the recruit? If multiple teams are tied on the interest level and with a scholarship, it's a toss up?

But just a tip, If you have more input and effort into a recruit the equation works out just like the gameplay. But that's what I think.

correct me if i'm wrong but my understanding is that the teams are just listed in alphabetical order within the interest range. coin flip is really a misnomber, wish that expression would die on here--it is a probability you influence based on the total amount of effort multiplied somehow by prestige, preferences, promises, etc. THAT SAID, knowing you were #1 or #2 between 2 VH teams wouldn't be particularly helpful information, because if you were in the same interest band, your chances would actually be about 50/50 (or 51/49 or some such). does knowing you have a 2% more chance to land a player really matter? beyond that, i think it's been pretty well documented what the ballpark chances are, and does knowing you lost by a few extra % odds really matter?

Posted by mullycj on 11/6/2016 6:39:00 PM (view original):

Posted by pallas on 11/6/2016 5:31:00 PM (view original):
...WOTS in 2.0? Not sure if this has already been addressed. But in battles where multiple teams are VH or H, should we have something that at least gives us an idea where our team falls within the battle?

We asked Seble for an email after the recruit signs telling us the % chance we had to sign him. He thought it was too much information because his goal was to keep us all in the dark.

Classic Seble.

Posted by bathtubhippo on 11/6/2016 6:43:00 PM (view original):
correct me if i'm wrong but my understanding is that the teams are just listed in alphabetical order within the interest range. coin flip is really a misnomber, wish that expression would die on here--it is a probability you influence based on the total amount of effort multiplied somehow by prestige, preferences, promises, etc. THAT SAID, knowing you were #1 or #2 between 2 VH teams wouldn't be particularly helpful information, because if you were in the same interest band, your chances would actually be about 50/50 (or 51/49 or some such). does knowing you have a 2% more chance to land a player really matter? beyond that, i think it's been pretty well documented what the ballpark chances are, and does knowing you lost by a few extra % odds really matter?

no and you're correct.