Admiral, but it's much, much closer than most people want to say.
90-91 season (ie the Kitchen Sink)
|
Usage% |
FG%+ |
eFG% |
OReb% |
DReb% |
Ast% |
Stl% |
Blk% |
Advanced |
26.6 |
116 |
55.2 |
12.0 |
23.2 |
7.7 |
1.7 |
5.6 |
$10,097,702
91-92 (bargain)
|
Usage% |
FG%+ |
eFG% |
OReb% |
DReb% |
Ast% |
Stl% |
Blk% |
Advanced |
24.7 |
117 |
55.2 |
10.8 |
22.5 |
8.4 |
2.7 |
6.6 |
$7,977,237
Zo's 97-98
|
Usage% |
FG%+ |
eFG% |
OReb% |
DReb% |
Ast% |
Stl% |
Blk% |
Advanced |
28.1 |
123 |
55.1 |
8.9 |
20.4 |
6.0 |
0.7 |
6.4 |
$8,037,283
What you're not seeing is Zo's 16 tov% & 5.4 pf48. Admiral is 13.7/4.1 & 12.1/4.1. Admiral is also much better at getting to the line. I think those (along with the slight rebounding advantage) give the edge to the Admiral, but Zo is still excellent for sure.