Posted by Trentonjoe on 3/1/2017 12:45:00 PM (view original):
Posted by mullycj on 3/1/2017 12:00:00 PM (view original):
Posted by Trentonjoe on 3/1/2017 9:27:00 AM (view original):
My point is it took very little effort to knock off a D3 team that was heavily invested in a recruit. I don't know for sure how much he put it but he was on him from the very beginning and I started recruiting him 2 days before the second period ended.
If I had one more cycle I would have doubled my effort by promising minutes, sending a HV and crushed the D3 school.
This happened after I lost 2 all in battles.
This thread is a joke. 1st you say he was heavily invested, then you come right back and say you don't know. Well it's true...you don't know how much they invested. It could have been the minimum it takes to get to VH,
Well, I don't know EXACTLY how much he invested but I can figure out roughly how much he put in.
This is what I do know:
I invested 162 AP.
He was on the players for the entire second period (and likely before that).
The value of my 162 AP was slightly more than the D3 had (I was 56-44 so the effort was very close to 50-50).
His preference's were roughly the same, he may have had a very small advantage.
My prestige gives me, at a very conservative estimate, 50% advantage.
I believe it is reasonable to suggest he had the equivalent of at least 250 AP in.
So my assessment is that he had AT LEAST 250 AP worth of effort in.
Lets just assume for fun you are correct.
Then.... you don't think it's ridiculous that for just ~100 more AP a DIII school can almost get to a 50/50 chance of signing a player vs a DI school?
I have no idea what he put in. But if that's the case, the title of the thread should have been. (DIII school has ~50% chance vs DI given similar effort,,, gasp!)
I doubt that's the case....but I just wanted to throw out the fact you shouldn't even have started a thread like this to get a reaction without having an idea of the specifics.