Do a schedule for Spicy, too. And remember, he hides "among" the bushes, not "in" the bushes. No fake news!

You're missing 6-7. Is that after-dinner nap time?

Putting green...tweety time

https://townhall.com/columnists/derekhunter/2017/05/14/the-irrationals-trumps-opponents-are-his-greatest-asset-n2326570

Nice story, Doc. That guy really gave it to the "leftists" in the media. "This week saw the media fall flat on their faces time and again." Good analysis of how the past week went down.

Here's a slightly more nuanced take from another conservative writer, Ross Douthat.

SEAN SPICEY - DAILY SCHEDULE

6 am - 7 am - breakfast and newspapers
7 am - 8 am - discuss events with whoever will talk to him
8 am - 9 am - study today's presidential tweets
9 am - 12 am - discuss events with whoever will talk to him
12 pm - 1 pm - prepare for news conference with communications staff
1 pm - 3 pm - news conference
3 pm - 330 pm - throw up
330 pm - 400 pm- discuss events with whoever will talk to him
400 pm - 500 pm - listen to trump rant and rave
500 pm - 600 pm - appointment with psychiatrist
600 pm - 730 pm - dinner
730 pm - 800 pm - study melissa mccarthy
800 pm - 1000 pm - quality time
1000 pm - 1045 pm - diary entries for his anti -trump book
1045 pm - bedtime

3 pm - 330 pm - throw up

In and/or among the bushes, right?

sometimes with the bushes.

The Republican’s Guide to Presidential Behavior

Remember when Obama appearing in shirt sleeves (sans jacket) in the White House was unpresidential? Times have changed!

Posted by mixtroy on 5/15/2017 9:14:00 AM (view original):
DoctorKz, what's the over and under on the number of scandals Trump can have before some people open their eyes and see that Trump has no clue about what he's doing and is in way over his head? Even his healthcare bill is gonna get shot down at the next level. He's a total joke and an embarrassment to the U.S. Presidency.

What's the over/under (NOT over and under) on the number of fake scandals the Libs come up with before they realize they're driving every rational person away, just as Doc's article states? Will losing another 1000 seats in November finally wake them up?

Good list, dino, although to be fair to Trump every single serious candidate from either party (aside from Bernie) would have filled his cabinet with Goldman Sachs people. Trump's not unique on that score.

By the way, whenever someone uses the terms "fake news" or "fake scandal" unironically -- i.e., the way Trump uses those terms -- I pretty much write that person off as hopeless when it comes politics.