Posted by zagsrulez on 6/8/2017 2:49:00 PM (view original):
Posted by gomiami1972 on 6/8/2017 2:01:00 PM (view original):
I would suggest you commit to one or the other rather than play the combo. Zone is very dependent on IQ. Splitting your set practice time between press and zone will not benefit you. You would be better served having your Seniors running an A+ in either rather than a B+/A- in both.
do you prefer press over zone? Ive been looking through posts and it seems as though zone is harder to win with and the hardest defense to understand and implement correctly. Running a combo sounds really interesting and exciting but for only 1 or 2 Turnover's a game, it might not be as worth it as I first thought
My apologies if this answer is somewhat convoluted but you ask a profound question that deserves more than a cursory answer but I can't get into too much detail or this post would be three pages long.
Personally, I prefer zone...but I'm biased. I ran press for many years and had lots of success (100 or so conference championships back in a time when HD had mostly full worlds) but became bored with it and decided to take the road less taken in zone. Zone
is harder to implement correctly, the least understood at a theoretical level and is, pound for pound, an inferior DEF set. However, zone allows for an expanded recruiting pool because players that would be horrific in a man/press situation can be effective in a zone. For that reason and many more, I find zone to be a blast.
With that said, if you are just starting to master HD, running man or press is probably the better way to begin. Most of your opponents will be using those sets and you absolutely must have a good understanding of how to both play man/press and how to attack it to be successful in HD. Once you have that skill in your toolbox, then you can think about experimenting with zone which, IMHO, is a more specialized DEF from a theoretical standpoint.
Hopefully, that made some sense.
6/9/2017 4:18 AM (edited)