Posted by The Taint on 6/9/2017 8:26:00 PM (view original):

Posted by DoctorKz on 6/9/2017 8:15:00 PM (view original):
Follow the money, Mr Mueller...see who got paid off, by whom.

Not to mention, shouldn't we see what Chris Mathews thinks?

My point was that even some pundits on the left know a dead end regarding Trump when they see it.

It doesn't matter.

Either he's guilty and out of office in less than three weeks

OR

CNN and every swinging liberal dick on this site and in television and in print and sitting on a hopper dealing with his popper is full of **** and will be summarily dealt with from the JULY deadline and forward.

PUT UP OR SHUTUP!

There is no "till the next election investigation"

There is only your crap.

What makes spittle and why does he have so much of it?

Trump or Comey, to tell the truth?

Not Comey. He isn't the choir boy we are led to believe. The Left currently hold him up high because he is badmouthing Trump. If he changes his tune they will turn on him.

Trump is no saint. He is as advertised. Brash, beliggerent, over the top. But innocent until proven guilty. Even if many attempt to ruin him. He stands in their way. So I will look past his faults. His enemies I view as a bigger threat. But I wont give him unlimited rope. He must provide results.

I don't like the lying. He should hold himself to a higher standard. If it is proved that he committed a crime, out he goes.

So many stories. Talk of corruption, mobsters, what have you. Trump University. Was he to blame? Or was his name on it, but improprieties done by someone else? The optics of a $25M settlement aren't good. Hillary didn't offer a cleaner slate. She reeked of corruption and greed. Either way we would have a President with flaws in that sense.

Posted by moy23 on 6/9/2017 7:08:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 6/9/2017 7:06:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 6/9/2017 4:48:00 PM (view original):
The evidence is from the notes of a fired man.

Boy, that's something I'd buy in at 100%!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You prefer to accept facts from the angry orange man who tweets in the middle of the night wearing a tin foil hat?

THERE ARE NO FACTS!!! NONE!!! ZERO!!!

ONLY HE SAID, HE SAID.

Of course there are facts. Unless you want to assert that they've never talked.

More than likely, one of them is telling something closest to the truth. Unless they are both flat out lying.

Which of the two has more credibility?

Comey showed he is part of the DC culture that holds us hostage. That keep us working for them, instead of the other way around.

Why wasn't he keeping notes on Lynch, when she obstructed? With Obama, who said there was nothing to see regarding Hillary's investigation?

He is/was hardly impartial.

HEY! Has the resignation speech date been set? Monday at the latest.

If not...we go in for the kill. IMPEACHMENT!

WE got the Senate votes.

WE got the House votes.

NO REASON TO WAIT.

None of this matters. Even if Mueller reports that Trump tried to suppress the investigation, I do not believe he can charge Trump.

So that leaves it to Congress and they ain't gonna impeach him.

And the Democrats are gonna **** up the mid terms.

So it's a waste of time to even discuss it. It's just a soap opera.

CNN FAKE?

The Republicans have said they wouldn't vote to impeach a Democrat with what "evidence" there is.

But Mueller has just begun. Who knows what he finds...politically, probably a very entertaining summer..

The only winners are the lawyers.

Posted by DoctorKz on 6/9/2017 9:29:00 PM (view original):
The Republicans have said they wouldn't vote to impeach a Democrat with what "evidence" there is.

But Mueller has just begun. Who knows what he finds...politically, probably a very entertaining summer..

The only winners are the lawyers.

And the media

And the Russians

And everybody world-wide looking and laughing at the Un United States of Ridiculous.

Posted by tecwrg on 6/9/2017 9:06:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 6/9/2017 7:08:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 6/9/2017 7:06:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 6/9/2017 4:48:00 PM (view original):
The evidence is from the notes of a fired man.

Boy, that's something I'd buy in at 100%!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You prefer to accept facts from the angry orange man who tweets in the middle of the night wearing a tin foil hat?

THERE ARE NO FACTS!!! NONE!!! ZERO!!!

ONLY HE SAID, HE SAID.

Of course there are facts. Unless you want to assert that they've never talked.

More than likely, one of them is telling something closest to the truth. Unless they are both flat out lying.

Which of the two has more credibility?

Yeah, who has ever heard of a recently fired employee lying about the boss that just unexpectedly fired them?