IMPEACH. REMOVE. IMPRISON.

Posted by mixtroy on 7/12/2017 1:52:00 AM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 7/11/2017 12:08:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bronxcheer on 7/11/2017 12:01:00 PM (view original):
Bombshell!

Dump Jr. is a chip off the orange block!

I can't wait to find out what the 'dirt' on Clinton was!!

This is going to backfire so badly on the Dems

Still on the "what about (fill in whatever person and their misdeeds in the PAST) ****! Hillary isn't the President of the United States, and people don't give a **** about her emails anymore. The issue is whether our CURRENT President or anyone in his campaign conspired with the russians to tilt the election in his favor!! And despite Chump's and his administration's denials that he had no knowledge of the meeting, common sense dictates that there's not a chance in hell that Chump's top three inner circle guys attended a meeting with someone who could potentially provide damaging info about Hillary WITHOUT Chump being advised of it BEFOREHAND. A person would have to be the bigeest dumbass on the planet earth to conclude otherwise. I'm not saying that would bring him down bc i still believe that Meuller and his bunch are gonna nail Chump for tax evasion and or conspiracy to money laundering with the russians.

You're assuming most people care. They don't. Only libs do. That's why the media and the Dems look morons as they rage over this subject.

Did you care about Benghazi or Hillary's emails? No. You still voted for Hillary despite those things. There's so many parallels here... But you're so angry you can't see them.

Posted by bad_luck on 7/12/2017 1:17:00 AM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/11/2017 10:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/11/2017 9:15:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/11/2017 8:57:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/11/2017 8:45:00 PM (view original):
Or, conversely, you could understand the precedent that was set.

Pretty sure, "hey they also did bad," has never been a acceptable excuse for wrongdoing.

Nope, but as I recall, Clinton wasn't impeached for it.

That might be the dumbest thing I've ever read here and that's saying a whole lot.

Has mike clarified this stupidity yet?

I thought Hillary won. Didn't she get 3 million more votes?

The Meeting was originally about adoption. Right now Dump would appreciate someone adopting Junior

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/12/2017 6:51:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/12/2017 1:17:00 AM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 7/11/2017 10:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/11/2017 9:15:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/11/2017 8:57:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/11/2017 8:45:00 PM (view original):
Or, conversely, you could understand the precedent that was set.

Pretty sure, "hey they also did bad," has never been a acceptable excuse for wrongdoing.

Nope, but as I recall, Clinton wasn't impeached for it.

That might be the dumbest thing I've ever read here and that's saying a whole lot.

Has mike clarified this stupidity yet?

I thought Hillary won. Didn't she get 3 million more votes?

Lol

I know. I didn't click the link. I assumed, which is really stupid around here, that it referred to a Clinton who was actually POTUS. Oops.

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/12/2017 9:13:00 AM (view original):
I know. I didn't click the link. I assumed, which is really stupid around here, that it referred to a Clinton who was actually POTUS. Oops.

That Clinton only proved that Liberals think it's OK to have sex with fat, ugly interns in the White House - and then lie about it.

Posted by all3 on 7/12/2017 9:43:00 AM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/12/2017 9:13:00 AM (view original):
I know. I didn't click the link. I assumed, which is really stupid around here, that it referred to a Clinton who was actually POTUS. Oops.

That Clinton only proved that Liberals think it's OK to have sex with fat, ugly interns in the White House - and then lie about it.

Why would that be relevant to the subject being discussed?

all3 makes me uncomfortable with his need to examine everyone's sex life. I guess that never finding a "fat ugly intern" who was willing to have sex with him makes him unhappy but this is not the appropriate forum for that discussion.

Posted by RCBracco on 7/12/2017 10:04:00 AM (view original):
all3 makes me uncomfortable with his need to examine everyone's sex life. I guess that never finding a "fat ugly intern" who was willing to have sex with him makes him unhappy but this is not the appropriate forum for that discussion.

The lies just never stop with you guys. Exactly who else's sex life did I ever examine here? NOBODY's (unlike you). That's OK, all the lies and attempted misdirection proves you have absolutely no facts to discuss regarding any of this. FWIW, Bill's actions are indicative of what every member of the Clinton Family, and apparently the Liberal Party, is capable of. Sorry that was too difficult for your pea-sized brain.

Posted by all3 on 7/12/2017 10:31:00 AM (view original):

Posted by RCBracco on 7/12/2017 10:04:00 AM (view original):
all3 makes me uncomfortable with his need to examine everyone's sex life. I guess that never finding a "fat ugly intern" who was willing to have sex with him makes him unhappy but this is not the appropriate forum for that discussion.

The lies just never stop with you guys. Exactly who else's sex life did I ever examine here? NOBODY's (unlike you). That's OK, all the lies and attempted misdirection proves you have absolutely no facts to discuss regarding any of this. FWIW, Bill's actions are indicative of what every member of the Clinton Family, and apparently the Liberal Party, is capable of. Sorry that was too difficult for your pea-sized brain.

Bill Clinton hasn't been president in 16 years, but NeoCons still bring him up again and again and again.

Meanwhile we've had three elected Presidents since.

Posted by sjpoker on 7/12/2017 10:33:00 AM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 7/12/2017 10:31:00 AM (view original):

Posted by RCBracco on 7/12/2017 10:04:00 AM (view original):
all3 makes me uncomfortable with his need to examine everyone's sex life. I guess that never finding a "fat ugly intern" who was willing to have sex with him makes him unhappy but this is not the appropriate forum for that discussion.

The lies just never stop with you guys. Exactly who else's sex life did I ever examine here? NOBODY's (unlike you). That's OK, all the lies and attempted misdirection proves you have absolutely no facts to discuss regarding any of this. FWIW, Bill's actions are indicative of what every member of the Clinton Family, and apparently the Liberal Party, is capable of. Sorry that was too difficult for your pea-sized brain.

Bill Clinton hasn't been president in 16 years, but NeoCons still bring him up again and again and again.

Meanwhile we've had three elected Presidents since.

Sarcasm seems beyond AL's ability to understand

Posted by sjpoker on 7/12/2017 10:33:00 AM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 7/12/2017 10:31:00 AM (view original):

Posted by RCBracco on 7/12/2017 10:04:00 AM (view original):
all3 makes me uncomfortable with his need to examine everyone's sex life. I guess that never finding a "fat ugly intern" who was willing to have sex with him makes him unhappy but this is not the appropriate forum for that discussion.

The lies just never stop with you guys. Exactly who else's sex life did I ever examine here? NOBODY's (unlike you). That's OK, all the lies and attempted misdirection proves you have absolutely no facts to discuss regarding any of this. FWIW, Bill's actions are indicative of what every member of the Clinton Family, and apparently the Liberal Party, is capable of. Sorry that was too difficult for your pea-sized brain.

Bill Clinton hasn't been president in 16 years, but NeoCons still bring him up again and again and again.

Meanwhile we've had three elected Presidents since.

Dubya and Reagan still get a lot of play around these parts.

Opinion ignored

House appropriators are including President Donald Trump's full request to fund a physical border wall in their proposed 2018 budget -- potentially setting up a shutdown fight this fall.

The House appropriations committee released its homeland security bill on Tuesday and it includes the full $1.6 billion requested by the Office of Management and Budget to begin construction on a southern border wall.

The bill also funds 500 new Border Patrol agents and more technology for securing the border, as well as money for Immigration and Customs Enforcement to hire 1,600 additional staff and increase detention capacity.