Posted by moy23 on 7/12/2017 2:55:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/12/2017 2:03:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 7/12/2017 1:12:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/12/2017 12:24:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 7/12/2017 12:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/12/2017 12:06:00 PM (view original):
So we're paying for it, not Mexico. Jesus trump another broken promise.

Mexico is already paying for it. Border crossings are WAY down because of Trump and the illegals from Central America are staying in Mexico!!!

A) how is that "paying for it?" We're still the ones that have to come up with several billion dollars to
fund wall.

B) If crossings are WAY down we don't need the wall.

The wall will pay for itself. $10 billion is a drop in the bucket for spending on a wall when it stunts the flow of illegal immigration, human trafficking, and illegal drugs crossing the southern border.... Which will save us tens of billions. That's a sound investment.

As to point B... So we can go way way way way down in border crossings... And make it more permanent so the next liberal in office doesn't resort to Oblunder's open border tactics.

Most illegal immigration, trafficking, and drugs already come through high traffic cities - San Ysidro, Otay, El Paso, etc. You know what all of those crossings have in common? They already have a wall (or a fence). Smuggling is how that stuff usually comes across.

A wall in the middle of New Mexico is not going to save us anything. It's the most expensive, least effective method of border security.

Blah blah blah.... That's like fencing off half your yard and then wondering why the barrier is not working.

To do it right it needs to be a YUGE beautiful wall that goes along the entire border!!!

You libs are so offended over a wall... It's hilarious.

I'd be HAPPY if my neighbors put up a wall around their yard.... I'd understand why too, might have something to do with all my #MAGA / Trump signs out front.

It doesn't matter anyway. The wall won't get built. Trump won't even be in office to fight over it.

Posted by wylie715 on 7/12/2017 3:13:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 7/12/2017 2:55:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/12/2017 2:03:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 7/12/2017 1:12:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/12/2017 12:24:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 7/12/2017 12:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/12/2017 12:06:00 PM (view original):
So we're paying for it, not Mexico. Jesus trump another broken promise.

Mexico is already paying for it. Border crossings are WAY down because of Trump and the illegals from Central America are staying in Mexico!!!

A) how is that "paying for it?" We're still the ones that have to come up with several billion dollars to
fund wall.

B) If crossings are WAY down we don't need the wall.

The wall will pay for itself. $10 billion is a drop in the bucket for spending on a wall when it stunts the flow of illegal immigration, human trafficking, and illegal drugs crossing the southern border.... Which will save us tens of billions. That's a sound investment.

As to point B... So we can go way way way way down in border crossings... And make it more permanent so the next liberal in office doesn't resort to Oblunder's open border tactics.

Most illegal immigration, trafficking, and drugs already come through high traffic cities - San Ysidro, Otay, El Paso, etc. You know what all of those crossings have in common? They already have a wall (or a fence). Smuggling is how that stuff usually comes across.

A wall in the middle of New Mexico is not going to save us anything. It's the most expensive, least effective method of border security.

Blah blah blah.... That's like fencing off half your yard and then wondering why the barrier is not working.

To do it right it needs to be a YUGE beautiful wall that goes along the entire border!!!

You libs are so offended over a wall... It's hilarious.

I'd be HAPPY if my neighbors put up a wall around their yard.... I'd understand why too, might have something to do with all my #MAGA / Trump signs out front.

I'm not offended by a wall. Just think it will cost millions if not billions of dollars that could be better spent in other areas, and I'm not sure how effective it will be.

You ARE offended. Otherwise why would you care about $10 billion? Let's put $10 billion in perspective.... The Iraq War cost us a Trillion, healthcare costs taxpayers trillions, we give out 10's of billions in foreign aid, pass trillion dollar bailout and infrastructure bills.....

And you're concerned that $10 billion (1/100th of a trillion) may not be spent effectively? Talk about jumping over dollars to pick up pennies. $10 billion is chump change BL. Admit it, YOU'RE OFFENDED BY THE WALL!!!

Posted by laramiebob on 7/12/2017 12:58:00 PM (view original):
"That Clinton only proved that Liberals think it's OK to have sex with fat, ugly interns in the White House - and then lie about it."

As that President clearly stated (under OATH!) he didn't have sex with that "intern" because it depends on what "is is".
I think I remember that correctly.
So (technically) you are incorrect as only the cigar would meet the qualification required within your claim.
Besides I don't think your grand-daughter is that ugly....... and more like just chubby.
But it's OK. I ain't blaming you.

So you're admitting Clinton lied and then played a semantics game. Thanks for the confirmation.

Helpful hint: when you attempt to make a person attack on someone, try to make it somewhat reasonable. Lewinski's age makes it physically impossible for her to be my grand-daughter. Just another blatantly stupid lie made-up by another blatantly stupid Liberal.

You want moy on that wall. You need moy on that wall...

First article of impeachment introduced in the house.

Posted by moy23 on 7/12/2017 12:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/12/2017 12:06:00 PM (view original):
So we're paying for it, not Mexico. Jesus trump another broken promise.

Mexico is already paying for it. Border crossings are WAY down because of Trump and the illegals from Central America are staying in Mexico!!!

You see? This is the blind, uniformed idiocy I'm talking about. Even assuming for argument sake that boarder crossing is in fact down since last year, based on what ******* evidence, proof or tangible data is "way" down BECAUSE OF Chump????

Unless you have some inside information on the actual numbers, i assume you're gonna try to support your comment by way of "fake news" gleaned from internet stories. Oh, that's right, internet stories are only fake when its bad news for Chump. Lol

Posted by moy23 on 7/12/2017 12:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/12/2017 12:06:00 PM (view original):
So we're paying for it, not Mexico. Jesus trump another broken promise.

Mexico is already paying for it. Border crossings are WAY down because of Trump and the illegals from Central America are staying in Mexico!!!

You see? This is the blind, uniformed idiocy I'm talking about. Even assuming for argument sake that boarder crossing is in fact down since last year, based on what ******* evidence, proof or tangible data is "way" down BECAUSE OF Chump????

Unless you have some inside information on the actual numbers, i assume you're gonna try to support your comment by way of "fake news" gleaned from internet stories. Oh, that's right, internet stories are only fake when its bad news for Chump. Lol

SAY IT TWICE, MIXTROY!!!! THAT WAY WE KNOW YOU MEAN IT!!!!!!

HELP, DOCTOR!

I SEE EVERYTHING TWICE!

Lol. I didn't mean to post it twice!

Prevezon

Remember that name.

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/12/2017 2:09:00 PM (view original):
Snipers with orders to shoot to kill.

Employs thousands, costs little and ensures the illegals don't try again in a different location.

Does this mean DougOut can get a new job???

Posted by The Taint on 7/12/2017 5:29:00 PM (view original):
Prevezon

Remember that name.

I take one of those every day for my gout.

Oh, THIS Prevezon.

"Last summer, Donald Trump Jr. met with a Kremlin-connected attorney in an attempt to obtain information 'that would incriminate Hillary,'" the Democrats wrote, citing the emails he published. "Earlier this year, on May 12, 2017, the Department of Justice made an abrupt decision to settle a money laundering case being handled by that same attorney in the Southern District of New York.

"We write with some concern that the two events may be connected — and that the Department may have settled the case at a loss for the United States in order to obscure the underlying facts."

The Prevezon case garnered high-profile attention, given its ties to a $230 million Russian tax-fraud scheme and the Russian lawyer Sergei Magnitsky, whose suspicious death aroused international media attention and spurred the passage of the Magnitsky Act in 2012. Denis Katsyv and Veselnitskaya have become the face of Moscow's lobbying efforts against the Magnitsky Act in recent years.

"So you're admitting Clinton lied and then played a semantics game. Thanks for the confirmation.

Helpful hint: when you attempt to make a person attack on someone, try to make it somewhat reasonable. Lewinski's age makes it physically impossible for her to be my grand-daughter. Just another blatantly stupid lie made-up by another blatantly stupid Liberal."

Sure. Who with a mind wouldn't. I'm no defender of Clinton(s). Nor a liberal.
As to Lewinski. So sorry. My bad. I thought she was much too young looking to be your daughter.... I stand corrected.