Posted by sjpoker on 7/12/2017 5:45:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/12/2017 2:09:00 PM (view original):
Snipers with orders to shoot to kill.

Employs thousands, costs little and ensures the illegals don't try again in a different location.

Does this mean DougOut can get a new job???

Posted by moy23 on 7/12/2017 3:30:00 PM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 7/12/2017 3:13:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 7/12/2017 2:55:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/12/2017 2:03:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 7/12/2017 1:12:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/12/2017 12:24:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 7/12/2017 12:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/12/2017 12:06:00 PM (view original):
So we're paying for it, not Mexico. Jesus trump another broken promise.

Mexico is already paying for it. Border crossings are WAY down because of Trump and the illegals from Central America are staying in Mexico!!!

A) how is that "paying for it?" We're still the ones that have to come up with several billion dollars to
fund wall.

B) If crossings are WAY down we don't need the wall.

The wall will pay for itself. $10 billion is a drop in the bucket for spending on a wall when it stunts the flow of illegal immigration, human trafficking, and illegal drugs crossing the southern border.... Which will save us tens of billions. That's a sound investment.

As to point B... So we can go way way way way down in border crossings... And make it more permanent so the next liberal in office doesn't resort to Oblunder's open border tactics.

Most illegal immigration, trafficking, and drugs already come through high traffic cities - San Ysidro, Otay, El Paso, etc. You know what all of those crossings have in common? They already have a wall (or a fence). Smuggling is how that stuff usually comes across.

A wall in the middle of New Mexico is not going to save us anything. It's the most expensive, least effective method of border security.

Blah blah blah.... That's like fencing off half your yard and then wondering why the barrier is not working.

To do it right it needs to be a YUGE beautiful wall that goes along the entire border!!!

You libs are so offended over a wall... It's hilarious.

I'd be HAPPY if my neighbors put up a wall around their yard.... I'd understand why too, might have something to do with all my #MAGA / Trump signs out front.

I'm not offended by a wall. Just think it will cost millions if not billions of dollars that could be better spent in other areas, and I'm not sure how effective it will be.

You ARE offended. Otherwise why would you care about $10 billion? Let's put $10 billion in perspective.... The Iraq War cost us a Trillion, healthcare costs taxpayers trillions, we give out 10's of billions in foreign aid, pass trillion dollar bailout and infrastructure bills.....

And you're concerned that $10 billion (1/100th of a trillion) may not be spent effectively? Talk about jumping over dollars to pick up pennies. $10 billion is chump change BL. Admit it, YOU'RE OFFENDED BY THE WALL!!!

Donald Trump Jr.’s shifting explanation of an undisclosed preelection meeting with a Russian lawyer who he was told had incriminating information on Hillary Clinton is rankling lawmakers already struggling to pass any part of President Trump’s agenda.

Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., said on Fox News Tuesday night that he is troubled by “the amnesia of people that are in the Trump orbit.”

"If you had a contact with Russia, tell the special counsel about it! Don’t wait until The New York Times figures it out!” an exasperated Gowdy said during a brief interview outside the Capitol after his Fox News appearance.

“Here we are beginning another week, this one in July, with a new revelation about Russia,” Gowdy said. “Someone close to the president needs to get everyone connected with that campaign in a room and say: From the time you saw ‘Doctor Zhivago’ until the moment you drank vodka with a guy named Boris, you list every single one of those, and we are going to turn them over to the special counsel. Because this drip, drip, drip is undermining the credibility of this administration.”

Gowdy — who led a two-year congressional investigation into Clinton’s handling of the deadly 2012 attacks in Benghazi, Libya — recently took over for outgoing Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah, as chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.

Posted by MikeT23 on 7/12/2017 7:19:00 PM (view original):
So you love Gowdy now?

Posted by moy23 on 7/12/2017 8:39:00 PM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 7/12/2017 7:01:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 7/12/2017 3:30:00 PM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 7/12/2017 3:13:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 7/12/2017 2:55:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/12/2017 2:03:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 7/12/2017 1:12:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/12/2017 12:24:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 7/12/2017 12:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/12/2017 12:06:00 PM (view original):
So we're paying for it, not Mexico. Jesus trump another broken promise.

Mexico is already paying for it. Border crossings are WAY down because of Trump and the illegals from Central America are staying in Mexico!!!

A) how is that "paying for it?" We're still the ones that have to come up with several billion dollars to
fund wall.

B) If crossings are WAY down we don't need the wall.

The wall will pay for itself. $10 billion is a drop in the bucket for spending on a wall when it stunts the flow of illegal immigration, human trafficking, and illegal drugs crossing the southern border.... Which will save us tens of billions. That's a sound investment.

As to point B... So we can go way way way way down in border crossings... And make it more permanent so the next liberal in office doesn't resort to Oblunder's open border tactics.

Most illegal immigration, trafficking, and drugs already come through high traffic cities - San Ysidro, Otay, El Paso, etc. You know what all of those crossings have in common? They already have a wall (or a fence). Smuggling is how that stuff usually comes across.

A wall in the middle of New Mexico is not going to save us anything. It's the most expensive, least effective method of border security.

Blah blah blah.... That's like fencing off half your yard and then wondering why the barrier is not working.

To do it right it needs to be a YUGE beautiful wall that goes along the entire border!!!

You libs are so offended over a wall... It's hilarious.

I'd be HAPPY if my neighbors put up a wall around their yard.... I'd understand why too, might have something to do with all my #MAGA / Trump signs out front.

I'm not offended by a wall. Just think it will cost millions if not billions of dollars that could be better spent in other areas, and I'm not sure how effective it will be.

You ARE offended. Otherwise why would you care about $10 billion? Let's put $10 billion in perspective.... The Iraq War cost us a Trillion, healthcare costs taxpayers trillions, we give out 10's of billions in foreign aid, pass trillion dollar bailout and infrastructure bills.....

And you're concerned that $10 billion (1/100th of a trillion) may not be spent effectively? Talk about jumping over dollars to pick up pennies. $10 billion is chump change BL. Admit it, YOU'RE OFFENDED BY THE WALL!!!

first of all, I'm not BL. That offends me. A wall doesn't. You don't know me at all so you can't have any idea what does and doesn't offend me. Even if $10 billion is "jumping over dollars to pick up pennies" as you say, couldn't that $10 billion help a whole lot of veterans?
Plus, to call $10 billion chump change is a bit of a stretch.

Lol.... Listen to you... You're offended!!!! You're offended to be called BL, you're offended by the wall, you're offended Trump is not spending this small amount of money on veterans. Do you need a safe space? Cause i know a few liberal colleges where you can find one.

U.S. intelligence officials heard Russian officials discussing associates of President Donald Trump in early 2015, the Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday.

The report comes one day after the president’s son Donald Trump Jr. released screenshots of emails showing he was contacted in June 2016 about a meeting with a Kremlin-linked attorney promising damaging information about Hillary Clinton. Trump Jr. has defended his decision to take the meeting, describing it as routine gathering of opposition research. Paul Manafort, then Trump’s campaign manager, as well as Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law and senior adviser, also attended the meeting.

According to the Wall Street Journal report, the conversations were picked up by intelligence officials who routinely monitor communications (including phone calls and emails) between people believed to be involved in Russian spying on the U.S. While WSJ’s sources did not say which associates were mentioned, they noted that the conversations included references to meetings between Trump’s allies and Russian officials held outside the U.S.

Officials are now reportedly revisiting those conversations in the wake of the Trump Jr. email revelations.