Posted by MikeT23 on 11/14/2017 2:14:00 PM (view original):
Posted by cubcub113 on 11/14/2017 1:59:00 PM (view original):
What buddha did was legal. Jeez. He had to sign him...
What's crazy was the team who had a guy transfer the signed him again.
That's kind of what I'm thinking. Anyone else could have scouted/signed the guy. BUT what if the other user said "I'm gonna cut this guy to see what happens" thus giving another user a heads up on where to look? It's a really gray area where collusion could take place. Should be fixed. Immediately.
And I still don't understand the reason for cutting him unless the hope was to re-sign him. That's sketchy as hell.
I have to agree with Mike here (feels strange saying that) it needs to be addressed as it can lead to some type of collusive behavior in the existing setup where a team which has an EE and feels they might not be competitive decides to cut an EE to help a conference mate and secretly informing them (although he has no control over where said cut EE ends up relocating to, although it would likely be local?).
For example, if UCLA cuts my EEs, I doubt it would hurt my prestige much (how much higher does it really need to be?) so if I ended up getting decimated and no hope to be competitive, I could do it technically.
11/14/2017 2:49 PM (edited)