What would do, Benis?

Wow, lots of reported stuff.

Posted by zorzii on 2/2/2018 11:56:00 AM (view original):
Wow, lots of reported stuff.

So weird, I wonder why?

We love polls! Amirite?

I love the in season recruiting...gives me something to do during the season, I just wish there were improvements to it.

Posted by crabman26 on 2/2/2018 1:00:00 PM (view original):
I love the in season recruiting...gives me something to do during the season, I just wish there were improvements to it.

I think that was the biggest appeal.

I also like being able to stretch out scouting throughout the season. Scouting was tougher to do in the old version especially if you were out of town - having to do scouting in a 2 hour window on your phone sucked.

I love how most people don't think it's a bad idea even though lots of people say "we all think..."

Posted by Trentonjoe on 2/2/2018 2:50:00 PM (view original):
I love how most people don't think it's a bad idea even though lots of people say "we all think..."

+1

HD’s very own Aaron Rodgers, ladies and gentlemen.

Sorry was confused by the original poll, so ignore my previous message.

I don't see a reason for a second/off season recruiting session. It's not like a new coach is going to be able to recruit anyway. Even then, they aren't paying for that season, they are paying for the next season.

A)Have players declare early.
B)Keep D-1 recruits to D-1, D-2 to D-2

This also eliminates D-2 and D-3 recruiting being so dull. It's simple and solves just about every issue.

The results are really close.

20 people like it. 20 people don't like it. And then 15 don't give a ****.

1200 don't give a ****.

Your design was poor, so you are predictably drawing poor conclusions. You biased the poll through the choices you presented. Instead of the standard 5 - very strong, strong, neutral, weak, very weak - you gave people 4, and skewed negative. So you are missing the people that don’t “love” the change, but enjoy it, and would prefer not messing with it. Maybe that group draws from neutral, maybe from very strong. You don’t know, because you didn’t stratify properly.

You’re presenting the results so far as though they are basically neutral, which is ridiculous. Based on the results you actually have, the coefficient result is +.31. The most accurate generalization you could make is that most people show ambivalence and a willingness to adapt, and among the people who feel strongly about it, far more people find it positive than negative.

Shoe is geting reported often. I Wonder what has gotten into him.

Wow, he can't say anything anymore. I Wonder why.